1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Project Reality announcements and development highlights.
Locked
Pvt.LHeureux
Posts: 4796
Joined: 2009-04-03 15:45

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Pvt.LHeureux »

^Nice first post hahaha
Image

Chuva_RD : You want to remove bugged thing but dont tell how to fill formed void.
tatne
Posts: 100
Joined: 2008-12-06 23:37

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by tatne »

Caan't wait
Delta1292
Posts: 63
Joined: 2010-07-19 11:16

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Delta1292 »

What are all the long range US rifles for?

I guess USMC and US Army have different layouts but as far as I can see there is:

M4 DMR
M14 EBR
M14 Scope/unscope
SPR silenced/unsilenced

are these replacing the current sniper rifles as well as DMR's, either way that is 6 different variants to fit 4 slots?
Image
Image
Cpt.Future
Posts: 192
Joined: 2008-09-16 16:52

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Cpt.Future »

Amazing.

dat HK417
Image
camo
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 3165
Joined: 2013-01-26 09:00

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by camo »

i am simply speechless. Will the fn mag have a scope for all of the factions or just the us army?
Frontliner
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 1884
Joined: 2012-10-29 09:33

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Frontliner »

Cpt.Future wrote:Amazing.

dat HK417
I'm hoping they don't forgot to add the BUIS :/
VTRaptor: but i only stopped for less than 10 secs and that fucking awesome dude put 2 of them

]CIA[ SwampFox: well my definition of glitching is using an enemy kit to kill the enemy

Just_Dave: i have a list about PR players, and they r categorized by their skill

Para: You sir are an arse and not what the game or our community needs.

AlonTavor: Is that a German trying to make me concentrate?

Heavy Death: join PRTA instead - Teamwork is a must there.
Airsoft
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4713
Joined: 2007-09-20 00:53

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Airsoft »

zurich wrote:Image
:mrgreen:
Image

Image
SShadowFox
Posts: 1123
Joined: 2012-01-25 21:35

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by SShadowFox »

Delta1292 wrote: M4 DMR -> USMC Alt Marksman maybe
M14 EBR -> US Army Marksman
M14 Scope/unscope -> PR:V probably
SPR silenced/unsilenced -> [place answer here]
1234567890
Image
[R-DEV]Spec:The suggestion is not accepted, I merely wanted to comment.

Shame doesn't work on me, Nor on men of my caliber.
camo
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 3165
Joined: 2013-01-26 09:00

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by camo »

Delta1292 wrote:What are all the long range US rifles for?

I guess USMC and US Army have different layouts but as far as I can see there is:

M4 DMR
M14 EBR
M14 Scope/unscope
SPR silenced/unsilenced?
Im pretty sure the M4 DMR is the alt US army marksman, the M14 EBR is the US army standard marksman, the M14 scoped is for vietnam, SPR is the standard marksman for the USMC and the silenced version being the alt kit.
hiberNative
Posts: 7305
Joined: 2008-08-08 19:36

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by hiberNative »

the release of bf4 is like an annoying little sister on her way home compared to this lush mod. my socks are jetting up through the stratosphere as we speak.
-Image
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Nate. »

Frontliner wrote:I'm hoping they don't forgot to add the BUIS :/
before asking for even more, appreciate how much work and dedication is behind all this.

I am thoroughly amazed by all this, thank you.
Image
Priby
Posts: 2379
Joined: 2008-06-21 18:41

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Priby »

Just my thoughts:
US Army: M14 EBR (with M4 DMR as alternate)
USMC: SPR
Vietnam: M14

I guess the G36 will have scope and red dot now?
Maybe even get the Zeiss red dot in future time?

Will there be a version of the Famas grenade launcher with the M203 or just the grenades shown on the picutre?

So much awesome stuff happening recently!
Cant wait for the Mosin, looks sexy!
Last edited by Priby on 2013-06-28 20:30, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Insanitypays
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 753
Joined: 2009-06-13 09:23

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Insanitypays »

So what about an M27 IAR for US Marines? My dads done live fire with them, and according to him, the weapon is already widely in use with Marines in combat, and they're already phasing out M16A4s(*EDIT-this was an error- I meant to say M249s) to replace them with IARs.

+US Army. Still using ACU in PR. Will they be updated to multicam?

The time range is becoming increasingly confusing*
Last edited by Insanitypays on 2013-07-19 09:13, edited 1 time in total.
Adriaan
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 5150
Joined: 2008-10-22 21:47

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Adriaan »

hiberNative wrote:the release of bf4 is like an annoying little sister on her way home compared to this lush mod. my socks are jetting up through the stratosphere as we speak.
I really enjoyed this analogy.
Image
Bluedrake42
Posts: 1933
Joined: 2009-07-23 17:52

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Bluedrake42 »

what about balance issues? from the looks of it not all factions get rifles with back up sights
is there going to be a "look over scope" option instead of iron sights for non backup weapons?
for say... the M4 etc.?
simeon5541
Posts: 507
Joined: 2011-01-11 22:33
Location: Serbia

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by simeon5541 »

I was scrolling through this endless,amazing list . . .
Just to realize that this is not all !

Great work guys,wish you best.

M16A1 DMR is my favorite.
Wheres_my_chili
Posts: 240
Joined: 2011-07-31 23:35

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Wheres_my_chili »

I was thinking the exact same thing as bluedrake. The brits use the same scope as the americans on their rifles and yet from what i can tell the americans dont get a dot sight, even though soldiers in afghanista use them. Is it a possibilty or are the americans getting shafted?
Spush
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4359
Joined: 2007-02-19 02:08

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Spush »

Different military, different gear and standard operating procedures. Not every military runs BUIS.
Priby
Posts: 2379
Joined: 2008-06-21 18:41

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by Priby »

While not exactly BUIS, doesnt the red line on the ACOGs serve as a cqc help.

Nvm: Apparently i mixed that up with the both eyes open aiming technique.
Image
speedazz
Posts: 108
Joined: 2011-01-13 05:21

Re: 1.0 - Weapon Feature (Not 56k friendly)

Post by speedazz »

Will PR 1.0 have a option to marry it?
Locked

Return to “Announcements & Highlights”