Intel HD 4000 vs GeForce 9400 GT

[the_12_gauge]

I was thinking maybe i could use my second pc for gaming too.Which one would show more fps in gaming, the integrated Intel HD 4000 or the old 9400 GT ?


The Cpu is the G3220 @ 3.00 Ghz with 4gb RAM at 1600 Mhz

[LITOralis.nMd]

The G3220 does not have the Intel HD 4000.
It has this:

Graphics Specifications
Processor Graphics ‡ Intel? HD Graphics
Graphics Base Frequency 350 MHz
Graphics Max Dynamic Frequency 1.1 GHz
Intel? Quick Sync Video No
Intel? Clear Video HD Technology Yes
# of Displays Supported ‡ 3

ARK | Intel? Pentium? Processor G3220 (3M Cache, 3.00 GHz)

I really doubt it will run vanilla BF2, let alone PR.

[Daniel]

You can try overclocking the 9400 GT though (slowly), but at your own risk! Use MSI Afterburner (best program) and watch the temperature in Overlay.

9400 gt overclocking - Graphics Cards - Overclocking

But you will get ~ 5 fps more only (according to a forum)...

So you better buy a GTS 450, GTX 460, GTX 560 Ti or GTX 650 Ti (Boost) (Not thaaat expensive)

[matty1053]

Honestly, the Geforce would get barely ~5 FPS more then the INTEL HD.

You would be better off getting a Gfx card that is decent and can run PR.

I would recommend the GTS 450, my bro's PC has one, iit's very nice IMO.

[Daniel]

But isn't GTX 460, GTX 560 Ti and GTX 650 Ti (Boost) all same price range and more powerful than GTS 450 ??

[Daniel]

Guys???

[Careless]

Yes it it.

For future reference; PassMark Software - Video Card Benchmarks - High End Video Cards

And how did you get an Intel HD 4000 with an AMD processor lol?



I'm running 30 to 70 fps with a i7 4770 on all high (no AA) on all maps.

Integrated graphics are fine for PR.