Yeah, there PLA had tanks, APCs, while US had 2 MH-6 + AH-6, TOW Hummwvs, etc.Conman51 wrote:This map was great back in .75....i just want that back.
Qwai Feedback/Suggestion
-
K4on
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 5055
- Joined: 2009-05-08 19:48
Re: Qwai Feedback/Suggestion
-
Rudd
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 21225
- Joined: 2007-08-15 14:32
Re: Qwai Feedback/Suggestion
.75 was unmitigated vehicle spam for the Chinese sideThis map was great back in .75....i just want that back.
-
Nitneuc
- Posts: 490
- Joined: 2007-09-16 08:39
Re: Qwai Feedback/Suggestion
I think this map could really improve with 2 flags attackable at once, at least for the 100p layer.
With the current set-up, the fightings seem too concentrated and attacking is almost always a losing move. By having two flags to defend at once, you could stack your attacking squads on the weaker enemy point, favoring the positions turn-over.
Nowadays most games feel like WWI, a mortars duel, each side sitting on their defending flag without any capture occurring.
With the current set-up, the fightings seem too concentrated and attacking is almost always a losing move. By having two flags to defend at once, you could stack your attacking squads on the weaker enemy point, favoring the positions turn-over.
Nowadays most games feel like WWI, a mortars duel, each side sitting on their defending flag without any capture occurring.
Many thanks to everyone involved in the making of the best videogaming experience ever !


