=HOG= (North America)
-
Spook
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: 2011-07-12 14:08
-
brezmans
- Posts: 661
- Joined: 2011-07-20 10:08
Re: =HOG= (North America)
To be extremely honest, no we are not. It's not really our intention to have 2 full servers. The problem stems from the fact that we have a few servers as redundancy to cover ddos attacks, server crashes and all that. Sometimes, although rarely, people join our second server if they don't see the other one in the list. Tonight was an example of that. Like I said, we don't want to expand, one server is enough of a headache, besides our bandwidth won't support two fulltime servers.
So, honest mistake
So, honest mistake
=HOG= Teamspeak
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
-
dumbcawk
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 2009-03-17 00:14
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Okay, so what's the matter? I got banned tonight for expressing my personal opinion (that Muttrah is a serverkiller). An admin replied that "I don't have the right to express an opinion if it's a shit one". Yes, I called him a fucking americunt afterwards and I firmly believe that it is much less of an insult than any kind of censorship is.
-
York
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2011-05-22 16:09
Re: =HOG= (North America)
And oh by the way, you come on our TS and make a real life threat? You're not too smart are you? Your temp ban has been extended to full ban on both our servers and TS. By all means come by and see me. Look forward to it.dumbcawk wrote:Okay, so what's the matter? I got banned tonight for expressing my personal opinion (that Muttrah is a serverkiller). An admin replied that "I don't have the right to express an opinion if it's a shit one". Yes, I called him a fucking americunt afterwards and I firmly believe that it is much less of an insult than any kind of censorship is.
Last edited by York on 2014-02-10 01:36, edited 3 times in total.
-
dumbcawk
- Posts: 15
- Joined: 2009-03-17 00:14
Re: =HOG= (North America)
What? I've never been to your TS server, I think you're mistaking me for someone else. My ingame nick: PanalfikYork wrote:And oh by the way, you come on our TS and make a real life threat? You're not too smart are you? Your temp ban has been extended to full ban on both our servers and TS. By all means come by and see me. Look forward to it.
-
__Super_6__5__
- Posts: 697
- Joined: 2008-08-15 14:09
Re: =HOG= (North America)
you werent banned for that man, you should go to our forums, this is not the place. and york thought you were someone else on the other post.
[18:57 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: nobody likes muttrah
[18:57 SQUAD 1 ] [AEgr] Cuz_Im_Batman: !shownext
[18:57 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: best map known to man
[18:57 GLOBAL ] IWI-GALIL.556FA: ok
[18:57 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !w panal shut up
[18:57 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= Sgt.Strudel: !w
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= sgt.nass: its only u
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: Well looks like you were told lo
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: shut up? am i not allowed to express my opinion? lol
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: you can go somewhere else
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: warn the others too
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: Adjust mortars adjust!
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: no
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Pipocouac: J6 Jabal
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =HOG= Haley11ACR: not if its stupid
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: now cut the all chat
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: A little to the west
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: fuk you
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: thank you haley
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: americunt fag
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: On that road on the map
[18:58 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !b panal asshat
[18:57 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: nobody likes muttrah
[18:57 SQUAD 1 ] [AEgr] Cuz_Im_Batman: !shownext
[18:57 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: best map known to man
[18:57 GLOBAL ] IWI-GALIL.556FA: ok
[18:57 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !w panal shut up
[18:57 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= Sgt.Strudel: !w
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= sgt.nass: its only u
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: Well looks like you were told lo
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: shut up? am i not allowed to express my opinion? lol
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: you can go somewhere else
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: warn the others too
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: Adjust mortars adjust!
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: no
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Pipocouac: J6 Jabal
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =HOG= Haley11ACR: not if its stupid
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: now cut the all chat
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: A little to the west
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: fuk you
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =BW= AnimalMother9335: thank you haley
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: americunt fag
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] USMC_Toney: On that road on the map
[18:58 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !b panal asshat
-
York
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2011-05-22 16:09
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Ah, yes indeed I have you confused with another one. Sorry about that. Actually, we don't allow incessant whining. Especially on all chat. The map was voted on and won. If you don't like the map, you could just move on. Not whine about it on all chat over and over disturbing others. You want to trash, and ***** about a map, do it here in the PR forums. Not on our server. That is what you were originally told to stop for. But you didn't like being told to stop. So you came back with a not so smart name calling. And yes, we can, do, and will not allow useless all chat spamming. Don't care if its your opinion or a holy mantra. Call it whatever you want. Read our rules.
Edit: And the above log only shows the one time you were whining about the map, after the vote was finished and the map determined. There was at least one other, maybe two entries, before that. All on all chat.
Edit: And the above log only shows the one time you were whining about the map, after the vote was finished and the map determined. There was at least one other, maybe two entries, before that. All on all chat.
Last edited by York on 2014-02-10 02:35, edited 1 time in total.
-
bren
- Posts: 735
- Joined: 2013-08-01 05:46
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Wondering why I'm banned *curious*
-
IINoddyII
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2268
- Joined: 2008-02-06 03:12
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Please don't discuss bans on these forums.
If you are honestly curious you could take it up on the =HOG= forums...
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html
If you are honestly curious you could take it up on the =HOG= forums...
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html
-
bren
- Posts: 735
- Joined: 2013-08-01 05:46
Re: =HOG= (North America)
I've tried to.'[R-MOD wrote:IINoddyII;1983043']Please don't discuss bans on these forums.
If you are honestly curious you could take it up on the =HOG= forums...
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html
Not once, not twice, but three times with my account being denied and/or being kicked from teamspeak without a detailed conversation.
And I didn't even do anything.
-
IINoddyII
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2268
- Joined: 2008-02-06 03:12
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Send a PM to brezmans - I'm sure he'll be able to clear things up.
-
__Super_6__5__
- Posts: 697
- Joined: 2008-08-15 14:09
Re: =HOG= (North America)
funny, i dont even see that you have applied on our forums, are you telling an untruth or are you using a different name?
-
__Super_6__5__
- Posts: 697
- Joined: 2008-08-15 14:09
Re: =HOG= (North America)
and your not in our ts ban list......
-
brezmans
- Posts: 661
- Joined: 2011-07-20 10:08
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Please guys, everyone should know by now that bans can't be discussed here. PM Super__6_5 or me about bans or forum activation. Feedback good and bad is welcome here, ban discussions unfortunately aren't.
=HOG= Teamspeak
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
-
KEIOS
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 2008-09-08 12:43
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Since negative feedback might often be about your admins behaviour resulting in bans for others, you can't blame people for coming here to express their thoughts. And telling someone to 'shut up', because his opinion is 'stupid' is the way to provoke him, just to give you guys a reason to ban him.
-
Bluedrake42
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: 2009-07-23 17:52
Re: =HOG= (North America)
You're not the only one who feels this way Keios.KEIOS wrote:Since negative feedback might often be about your admins behaviour resulting in bans for others, you can't blame people for coming here to express their thoughts. And telling someone to 'shut up', because his opinion is 'stupid' is the way to provoke him, just to give you guys a reason to ban him.
Edit: I will also point out that this is an open forum, and players may post here whatever they want.
-
Nate.
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 3018
- Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Might wanna read this then Bluedrake: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... ost1627341
However, @ HOG, I would suggest (I have also experienced similar stuff on your server) to develop some kind of standard procedure when it comes to kicking and warning people. !k name asshat is not really an appropriate way of showing a player they misbehaved. We used to have shortcuts for different kick reasons and many other servers do - I don't know if you have that aswell. !k name afk would for example give a message "You were afk. Thank you for joining HOG."
So instead of
[18:57 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !w panal shut up
maybe use !w panal allchat or if you have the time !w panal no discussion on mapvote
[18:58 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !b panal asshat
maybe use !b panal language
This way you increase the legitimacy and confirmability of actions taken against rule offenders. This way, panalfiks reaction would propably been a different one:
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: shut up? am i not allowed to express my opinion? lol
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: you can go somewhere else
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =HOG= Haley11ACR: not if its stupid
Of course, admins want to play aswell, but their primary concern should be towards the server and then themselves.
However, @ HOG, I would suggest (I have also experienced similar stuff on your server) to develop some kind of standard procedure when it comes to kicking and warning people. !k name asshat is not really an appropriate way of showing a player they misbehaved. We used to have shortcuts for different kick reasons and many other servers do - I don't know if you have that aswell. !k name afk would for example give a message "You were afk. Thank you for joining HOG."
So instead of
[18:57 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !w panal shut up
maybe use !w panal allchat or if you have the time !w panal no discussion on mapvote
[18:58 SQUAD 4 ] =HOG= York_54: !b panal asshat
maybe use !b panal language
This way you increase the legitimacy and confirmability of actions taken against rule offenders. This way, panalfiks reaction would propably been a different one:
[18:58 GLOBAL ] Panalfik: shut up? am i not allowed to express my opinion? lol
[18:58 TEAM 1 ] =HOG= York_54: you can go somewhere else
[18:58 GLOBAL ] =HOG= Haley11ACR: not if its stupid
Of course, admins want to play aswell, but their primary concern should be towards the server and then themselves.

-
brezmans
- Posts: 661
- Joined: 2011-07-20 10:08
Re: =HOG= (North America)
You are absolutely right, Keios. The warn reason should not have been 'shut up', I wholeheartedly agree with you there. We have set up rules within our clan to make warn/kick reasons more elaborate so people know exactly what they are doing wrong and nobody gets provoked unnecessarily. I'm assuming this was a heat-of-the-moment situation, but that's no excuse. We will follow up on this.KEIOS wrote:Since negative feedback might often be about your admins behaviour resulting in bans for others, you can't blame people for coming here to express their thoughts. And telling someone to 'shut up', because his opinion is 'stupid' is the way to provoke him, just to give you guys a reason to ban him.
Thanks for your input.
Edit: Nate, only now saw your post. I agree with your points, you make a similar point to Keios. Thanks both for the input.
=HOG= Teamspeak
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
On indefinite LOA from April 2014.
-
Brainlaag
- Posts: 3923
- Joined: 2009-09-20 12:36
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Nothing to add myself but I would wholeheartedly recommend you to setup macros for the ! commands. PRTA and other servers with a very committed staff had that and it somehow gave you a feel of organization and unity when dealing with disruptive people, while also keeping it objective and less prone to bias. Furthermore the issue with "oh that admin is a major *******" nearly vanished and HOG definitely suffers from, uhm, people with temperbrezmans wrote:You are absolutely right, Keios. The warn reason should not have been 'shut up', I wholeheartedly agree with you there. We have set up rules within our clan to make warn/kick reasons more elaborate so people know exactly what they are doing wrong and nobody gets provoked unnecessarily. I'm assuming this was a heat-of-the-moment situation, but that's no excuse. We will follow up on this.
Thanks for your input.
Edit: Nate, only now saw your post. I agree with your points, you make a similar point to Keios. Thanks both for the input.
Just underlining an important point IMO, keep up the good work Brez. I don't think I have said this yet but you were and still are a major asset that made HOG improve a lot since the 24/7 days, wish more people were committed and honest like you. Peace.
Last edited by Brainlaag on 2014-02-10 18:18, edited 1 time in total.
-
KEIOS
- Posts: 522
- Joined: 2008-09-08 12:43
Re: =HOG= (North America)
Since i've got kicked and then banned from your servers by York, because one guy in my squad was accused of baserape, i wouldn't say it was in the heat of the moment. I understand that administration ingame can be hard, since people expect a fair judgement by someone who can not have his eyes and ears everywhere and who still wants to enjoy the game - but that is, why you need admins who are in control of their temper and not someone who enjoys the admin power too much. The decay of former popular servers always started with few guys who abused their admin privileges, believing that it wouldn't affect the popularity.brezmans wrote:You are absolutely right, Keios. The warn reason should not have been 'shut up', I wholeheartedly agree with you there. We have set up rules within our clan to make warn/kick reasons more elaborate so people know exactly what they are doing wrong and nobody gets provoked unnecessarily. I'm assuming this was a heat-of-the-moment situation, but that's no excuse. We will follow up on this.
Thanks for your input.

