SMAW

WallEYE-(PR) · Post by **WallEYE-(PR)** » 2006-11-19 03:57

Is it me, or the USMC lit AT still off-set, I try to shot a humvee earlier today and it shot to the top left, is anyelse having this problem

Wasteland · Post by **Wasteland** » 2006-11-19 04:12

All the time. I hate it. The other teams get very accurate light AT. Why not for the Americans? Well, I guess the Americans do get kickass spec ops. But it makes the SMAW useless except at ridiculously short range. At such close range I'd rather be spec ops anyways, and run out of an alley with those SLAMs.

Speaking of which, those SLAMs should be strong enough to take out a tank or APC with both, and a hummer/vodnik with one. But I don't think they are.

Post by **BrokenArrow** » 2006-11-19 04:48

The SMAW inaccuracy is a known issue.

dunkellic · Post by **dunkellic** » 2006-11-19 13:06

yeah, it´s actually a problem that still exists in usi, which were so nice and "donated" their smaw

(blacksunstudio thingy)

WallEYE-(PR) · Post by **WallEYE-(PR)** » 2006-11-19 17:47

Wasnt sure, so i thought i would bring it up..

THANKS GUYS

Mekstizzle · Post by **Mekstizzle** » 2006-11-21 17:55

The sights could be improved too. The RPG gets a nice detailed "rim" thing whilst the SMAW gets an ugly black thing that looks like it was made in paint.

No offence, but cmon guys compaired to the RPG scope... it's pretty awful. If you can make a nice scope for that why not a nice one for the SMAW?

Post by **GeZe** » 2006-11-22 02:41

the sights aren't centred, press Q when in the sights, Q is always in the middle, you can see how off centre the sights are.

Post by **RikiRude** » 2006-12-01 07:24

^geze that's genious!

(3FJ)Armin · Post by **(3FJ)Armin** » 2006-12-01 14:37

But if the sights are off by the same amount every time, you compensate, just like with the SVD.
It also give that little real world feel where things don't always work properly
Remember: Murphy lives and he's in your squad.

G.Drew · Post by **G.Drew** » 2006-12-01 17:38

'[R-DEV wrote:Riki_Rude_BTYC']^geze that's genious!

man u havent worked that out? geez...

but seriously the RPG has a much easier time than the SMAW when it hould be the other way round, it usually take me 4 secs to fire a SMAW, while with the with the RPG its around about 2 secs

btw since they 'donated' there SMAW, y dont u get them to 'donate' there RPG aswell, cos its really nic!

Post by **RikiRude** » 2006-12-01 19:47

yeah i tend to stick with the heavy AT kit if im going to use any kind of AT kit at all. Those one shot heavy AT hits are murder =)