you should see the shilkaRaklodder wrote:I think this needs to be acknowledge sooner than later, because honestly, it looks bloody awful, unless those bots are simply tanked on jet fuel or something, in which case a quick server restart would suffice - you be the judge.
it used to be feared by pilots -- now can barely hit the osprey hovering over it ^_^_^_^I'm glad I don't play coop that often, but maybe I should, considering there's no immediate need to wait for others to join, simply hop in and get into a big fight - let's cross our fingers that this will be addressed in the next hotfix.Scubbo wrote:you should see the shilka
When the inertia is repaired we will have a much more realistic system , with the possibility of increasing further the diversity and depth of combat between vehicles , each having a tower that move following the limits of its real counterpart .himond wrote:Change is good despite the unwanted inertia.
Most complains are really bad argumented and lame such as "devs are not in touch with community" wich is plainly bitching.
True.. very easy to kill APCs on Karbala, Fallujah!Chefmoto1 wrote:SPGs are more effective at killing tanks than other tanks are now. lol
As far as I know it's impossible.By_Zaca wrote:Its very SIMPLE to solve this problem with inertia.
Just configure the turret like the SPG-9. You have a small angle to use a "free mouse" and need to use A or D to move. I think it would be more exciting and real!
Double that.himond wrote:Change is good despite the unwanted inertia.
Most complains are really bad argumented and lame such as "devs are not in touch with community" wich is plainly bitching.
+1 horrible movement especially for APC !3ti65 wrote:Just reverse the change.
End of discussion.
sure, just remove armor and lets play a big skirmish game. its a lame excuse for a broken system like that, i would only support if we can have it working right.IlluminatorConfirmed wrote:As far as I know it's impossible.
And, damn, I don't think they need to change anything. I enjoy new system a lot. Because now you MUST to think about your actions you can't just rely on your ability to turn your turret quick. You can't just ram into the city without any consequences, since you're not going to be able to react on threats as quickly as it was before the patch.
Double that.
Infantry > Armor.
This is how it should be.
It's not broken at all, it's NEW. It's you who can't understand how to deal with that.Roque_THE_GAMER wrote:sure, just remove armor and lets play a big skirmish game. its a lame excuse for a broken system like that, i would only support if we can have it working right.
even the devs already admit its broken system, why defending this?IlluminatorConfirmed wrote:It's not broken at all, it's NEW. It's you who can't understand how to deal with that.
Me and my pal did 22 to 1 yesterday on Burning Sands riding around of the town on a... SCIMITAR, supporting infantry. And it's not even a lot. I've seen dudes who did more. Me personally did 16 to 0 on Kashan in a tank. Destroyed 3 BMPs and two tanks. One of BMPs I've hit while we was on the move(that was a luck shot but still). It's just you people who can't be a part of a new system.
Change is always FUN(except that RPG nerf in 0.9ish).
Because I liked it.Roque_THE_GAMER wrote:even the devs already admit its broken system, why defending this?
Erhm. COOP = Target practicing. No fun playing it at all, all fun is in confronting real people, who can come up with original solutions for problems their enemies create.Scubbo wrote:it is broken for the AI in COOP - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNQ8aznadZA
its 20-30% of the stable PR-player base brother.IlluminatorConfirmed wrote:Erhm. COOP = Target practicing. No fun playing it at all, all fun is in confronting real people, who can came up with original solution for problems you create them.
I was trying to find right words which are not going to hurt them... but I can't. I just think they don't get the idea of game, or, maybe, they are afraid to lose?Scubbo wrote:its 20-30% of the stable PR-player base brother.