[F|H] Project Reality server

Player feedback for all Project Reality: Battlefield 2 servers.
Locked
RaNa-Rocxs
Posts: 533
Joined: 2016-06-12 09:51

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by RaNa-Rocxs »

[R-CON]AlonTavor wrote:Today: Khami, followed by Kashan, and then Black gold.

There are plenty of new players in the PR community, in these maps they are just pure cannon fodder. Stop marathoning them.
mate that all map's set with map vote's
we ask to all any map suggest so everyone suggest map's after that we did map vote

mapvote like this
Mapvote: 1: Sbeneh Outskirts 2: Khamisiyah Alt 3: Iron Ridge
Mapvote: 1: Sbeneh Outskirts 2: Kashan Desert 3: Assault On Grozny
Mapvote: 1: battle of iadrang 2: Beirut 3: Black Gold
so what's wrong we are not set any map with over self
Image
gwa1hir
Posts: 227
Joined: 2015-04-17 20:12

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by gwa1hir »

i reported 2 times that you can actually set black gold infantry layout which is a nice city map in a sand storm basically. but i guess you kinda just ignored that
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MAG8dcg.jpg[/img]
RaNa-Rocxs
Posts: 533
Joined: 2016-06-12 09:51

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by RaNa-Rocxs »

gwa1hir wrote:i reported 2 times that you can actually set black gold infantry layout which is a nice city map in a sand storm basically. but i guess you kinda just ignored that
just you ask me so i set infantry layout ?? :D so mate what's about 28 other players vote for standard layout come on dude next time I will try only for you be happy :)
Image
UTurista
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 985
Joined: 2011-06-14 14:13

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by UTurista »

RaNa-xXx1 wrote:mapvote like this
Mapvote: 1: Sbeneh Outskirts 2: Khamisiyah Alt 3: Iron Ridge
Mapvote: 1: Sbeneh Outskirts 2: Kashan Desert 3: Assault On Grozny
Mapvote: 1: battle of iadrang 2: Beirut 3: Black Gold
so what's wrong we are not set any map with over self
Yes you are, you're putting 1 map for asset whores against 2 normal maps, which means that althout a majority of votes wanted non asset map, the asset map still "wins" with the most votes.

You have 47 maps to choose from, just make:
Mapvote 1: <2km Map> <2km Map> <2km Map>
Mapvote 2: <4km Map> <4km Map> <4km Map>
Mapvote 3: <Asset Map> <Asset Map> <Asset Map>
repeat
Image


Dont question the wikipedia! Just because it reports different things on different languages does not make it unreliable source!
RaNa-Rocxs
Posts: 533
Joined: 2016-06-12 09:51

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by RaNa-Rocxs »

[R-CON]UTurista wrote:
You have 47 maps to choose from, just make:
Mapvote 1: <2km Map> <2km Map> <2km Map>
Mapvote 2: <4km Map> <4km Map> <4km Map>
Mapvote 3: <Asset Map> <Asset Map> <Asset Map>
repeat
yes that's a good idea okay we will try in future same like this
Image
fecht_niko
Posts: 347
Joined: 2013-06-29 13:42

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by fecht_niko »

If you guys work on the map votes like turista suggested and get some more experienced admins or train the new admins better the gameplay will increase a lot!
The only conflict I had with an admin was sorted out by Dutch immediately.
gwa1hir
Posts: 227
Joined: 2015-04-17 20:12

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by gwa1hir »

RaNa-xXx1 wrote:just you ask me so i set infantry layout ?? :D so mate what's about 28 other players vote for standard layout come on dude next time I will try only for you be happy :)
wtf is wrong with you man, they voted for the map not the layout. i just suggest a solution so you "competent" admins would avoid complains about 3 fucking 4km asset maps in a row. BUT YEAH I ONLY SUGGESTED IT TO MAKE MYSELF HAPPY....are you fucking serious?!?!?!
.....jesus christ this guy is triggering me so hard
right now i cant decide if he is stupid or just incompetent or both. sorry for that language but this guy is just insane

really dutch i try to understand your decision but i cant find a reason why you would keep this guy.its just mind-boggling
Last edited by gwa1hir on 2016-11-16 21:14, edited 6 times in total.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MAG8dcg.jpg[/img]
mrjoe(ita)
Posts: 80
Joined: 2008-10-21 01:07

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by mrjoe(ita) »

gwa1hir wrote:wtf is wrong with you man, they voted for the map not the layout. i just suggest a solution so you "competent" admins would avoid complains about 3 fucking 4km asset maps in a row. BUT YEAH I ONLY SUGGESTED IT TO MAKE MYSELF HAPPY....are you fucking serious?!?!?!
.....jesus christ this guy is triggering me so hard
right now i cant decide if he is stupid or just incompetent or both. sorry for that language but this guy is just insane

really dutch i try to understand your decision but i cant find a reason why you would keep this guy.its just mind-boggling
What is mind-boggling is you insulting someone who is trying to help solve your concerns, have some fucking respect please.
gwa1hir
Posts: 227
Joined: 2015-04-17 20:12

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by gwa1hir »

what?!?!?!? he was mocking ME for trying to help HIM....I MMADE A SUGGESSTION INGAME because i KNEW there would be complaints afterwards. and now HE says i did it just to make myself happy because i wanted to do black gold inf I GAVE HIM A SOLUTION TO THE 3 4KM MAPS ISSUE BY SETTING BLACK GOLD. and now look how he responded here to me!u
and what happened afterwards after he ignored my suggestion that tried TO HELP HIM DO HIS ADMIN JOB PROPERLY?? hm? hm? what happened? RIGHT people started complaining here about the maps again. YEAH SORRY FOR HELPING. like rana said i just did it out of selfish reason just so i could be happy. thats a fucking joke
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MAG8dcg.jpg[/img]
PricelineNegotiator
Posts: 1382
Joined: 2009-08-30 04:32

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by PricelineNegotiator »

At first glance, it seems like Gwaihir is freaking out, but as you go further back in the discussion about this server, it becomes evident that he (along with others) is becoming frustrated over time due to consistently poor decisions by the management of this server.

I think the server management should take heed of the reviews in this thread and attempt a massive overhaul in their admin and mapvote structure.
YAK-R
Posts: 335
Joined: 2012-07-07 15:04

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by YAK-R »

[R-CON]UTurista wrote:Yes you are, you're putting 1 map for asset whores against 2 normal maps, which means that althout a majority of votes wanted non asset map, the asset map still "wins" with the most votes.

You have 47 maps to choose from, just make:
Mapvote 1: <2km Map> <2km Map> <2km Map>
Mapvote 2: <4km Map> <4km Map> <4km Map>
Mapvote 3: <Asset Map> <Asset Map> <Asset Map>
repeat
To add to this, try and put maps in the vote of equal popularity, and of different factions than the ones currently being played.

Like if the map is grozny, try avoiding maps like saaremaa etc otherwise one team will be russia twice etc
RaNa-Rocxs
Posts: 533
Joined: 2016-06-12 09:51

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by RaNa-Rocxs »

gwa1hir wrote:wtf is wrong with you man, they voted for the map not the layout. i just suggest a solution so you "competent" admins would avoid complains about 3 fucking 4km asset maps in a row. BUT YEAH I ONLY SUGGESTED IT TO MAKE MYSELF HAPPY....are you fucking serious?!?!?!
.....jesus christ this guy is triggering me so hard
right now i cant decide if he is stupid or just incompetent or both. sorry for that language but this guy is just insane

really dutch i try to understand your decision but i cant find a reason why you would keep this guy.its just mind-boggling
i replay you with respect but i don't think so you deserve this are you fucking stupid or some time is special
if you want to make feedback do with respect if you do this next time we will request to PR admins do something abut you and we banned you form our server to pls do respect if you need respect.
we have full server 100 players all other 98 players want to play big map but Mr gwa1hir with one friend want to play INF map :D wow. he suggest me for infantry layout
gwa1hir wrote:i reported 2 times that you can actually set black gold infantry layout which is a nice city map in a sand storm basically. but i guess you kinda just ignored that
you show how much stupid you are, are you fucking serious? All professional big players playing on that time mate all want to play big map, sorry for that language but this guy deserve this,

we will try do in future same like this.
[R-CON]UTurista wrote: You have 47 maps to choose from, just make:
Mapvote 1: <2km Map> <2km Map> <2km Map>
Mapvote 2: <4km Map> <4km Map> <4km Map>
Mapvote 3: <Asset Map> <Asset Map> <Asset Map>
repeat
User infracted. - Mod // read: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html
Last edited by Nate. on 2016-11-20 12:20, edited 1 time in total.
Image
gwa1hir
Posts: 227
Joined: 2015-04-17 20:12

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by gwa1hir »

thx rana that you show everybody again that not only you write in bad english you are also horrible at understanding english.. you basically didnt understand a single thing i said. dutch just look at this....how can u have an admin that cant even understand what people are trying to tell him.....this is ridiculous. a key skill of an admin is communication. of course it can not work if the admin isnt even capable of speaking nor understanding english. he still thinks i suggest black gold inf because i wanted to actually play it. ye sorry for trying to help this imbecile, wont happen again.
maybe someone is capable of speaking pakistani so you could translate to him what i actually wrote.

User infracted. - Mod // read: https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html
Last edited by Nate. on 2016-11-20 12:19, edited 2 times in total.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MAG8dcg.jpg[/img]
Cossack
Posts: 1689
Joined: 2009-06-17 09:25

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by Cossack »

Kinda avoiding FH now, because asset maps are in effect most of the time, so not much to do for infantry. Also, really bad calls from admins for map choices. One evening it was Kashan, then Khami, then Bijar... Come on...
RaNa-xXx1 wrote:
we have full server 100 players all other 98 players want to play big map but Mr gwa1hir with one friend want to play INF map :D wow. he suggest me for infantry layout



you show how much stupid you are, are you fucking serious? All professional big players playing on that time mate all want to play big map, sorry for that language but this guy deserve this
Please provide names of these "big professional players". Want to know, who are these people that like 4 km maps with full assets. And please no names of those who are asset whores, that cant do inf for shit.

Also, there is nothing wrong running full server on 4km Inf layer.

Only player that I can be called professional from FH is dutch, because he knows what he is talking about and when he is on server, good things happen.
Image
User avatar
Mineral
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 8534
Joined: 2012-01-02 12:37
Location: Belgium

Post by Mineral »

Lots of reports from this thread. Locked until moderators can take a look.
Image
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by Nate. »

Cleaned up a bit, guys, seriously. Read this https://www.realitymod.com/forum/f29-pr ... -read.html

I will not say it again, the next one flamebaiting, derailing and even slightly insulting, no matter what side, will get a massive infraction.
Image
sunshine2241991
Posts: 220
Joined: 2013-05-12 16:04

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by sunshine2241991 »

i like the way it is .
INS vs AAS .

then admins ask for maps suggestions .
than 3 maps get a vote .

it very democratic . majority decide what to play .

some servers dont run votes at all . and no one complain
-----------Ghost-------------

My sh1t Channel : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJyLk5Ybj_a12QV_qaarCcQ
My Sh1tty Mixtapes : https://soundcloud.com/ghostidd
dutch
Posts: 333
Joined: 2008-07-15 22:32

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by dutch »

Just publicly for the F|H admins replying in here, keep the discussion pure about the server and without insults. Also do not add useless things to the discussion. Keep this thread professional.
Kinda avoiding FH now, because asset maps are in effect most of the time, so not much to do for infantry. Also, really bad calls from admins for map choices. One evening it was Kashan, then Khami, then Bijar... Come on...
I agree, and the only way to avoid it, is to stop with the voting. When I am on the server I mostly decide the map by asking in allchat to give a few recommendations, and I see who answers and then base it on that. But 100% agree that there must be more infantry maps in the night.
[img]http://i.imgur.com/Jcuzeia.png?1[/img]
http://www.forgottenhonor.com
gwa1hir
Posts: 227
Joined: 2015-04-17 20:12

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by gwa1hir »

so we play muttrah then gaza gets said next. it didnt say a word nor did i say a word the last days on the server. then for once i open my mouth and just said exactly this
"running a city map into a city map is maybe not the best choice"
again trying to help and make admins aware of that..
dutchy replied by threatening me with a ban. again i only said this one single sentence the last week on the server
"running a city map into a city map is maybe not the best choice"
but thats now ban worthy.
then i asked if im forbidden to express criticism, and dutchy replied with a simple "yes you are"

so basically after the server being criticized for weeks,they decided to just ban criticism. which is pretty effective when you want to avoid it
[img]http://i.imgur.com/MAG8dcg.jpg[/img]
IronMAN771
Posts: 15
Joined: 2016-10-09 07:01

Re: [F|H] Project Reality server

Post by IronMAN771 »

I think good choice to make your own server i am with you :D we play alone in your server
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Server Feedback”