X-95 Micro

Post your feedback on the current Project Reality release (including SinglePlayer).
Post Reply
GAJAN
Posts: 110
Joined: 2017-09-09 10:39

X-95 Micro

Post by GAJAN »

I think that this weapon at least without scope (4x or something else) killed the 4km maps like bijar where idf fights with mec. Litteraly you wont shoot whole game cause enemies are too far and it is impossible to be accurate with iron sights on long range. Conclusiin: put back ctar21 or add scope to this x95
VTRaptor
Posts: 330
Joined: 2015-06-25 14:49

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by VTRaptor »

Disagree. Scopeless variants are the best thing in this game, where infantry squads aren't sniper squads, AR isn't a sniper rifle and DMR is actually useful. Current meta where everyone is a sniper and is capable of killing anyone at the range of view distance is awful and makes many weapons being used in wrong(unrealistic) way. AR/MG is supposed to be support weapon mainly for suppresing and covering fire, not a sniper rifle. Standard rifle should be effective on short range. With scopes you don't need to suppres enemies, you can just outgun them.

However, Bijar is an asset map and infantry plays only a tiny role there.
GAJAN
Posts: 110
Joined: 2017-09-09 10:39

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by GAJAN »

Mainly thing is G3s recoil for close combat which you must say is a lot bad. Only what saves it is its damage
VTRaptor
Posts: 330
Joined: 2015-06-25 14:49

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by VTRaptor »

Nope, I have no problems in cqb when using G3. The problem is on your side.

@edit, the topic is about scopes, stay on it.
User avatar
Mats391
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 7643
Joined: 2010-08-06 18:06

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by Mats391 »

G3 gets bayonet for CQB.
Image

Mineral: TIL that Wire-guided missiles actually use wire
GAJAN
Posts: 110
Joined: 2017-09-09 10:39

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by GAJAN »

Mats391 wrote:G3 gets bayonet for CQB.
I didnt meat cqb, I was thinking about close combat with guns not bayonets because g3s recoil and fire rate compared to x95 and there is a bit of balance in those optics. Someone said abou scopless weapons are better. Yes but not for long range fights which they are (bijar for example) fighting one side of valley to another one.
solidfire93
Posts: 491
Joined: 2015-06-26 14:21

Re: X-95 Micro

Post by solidfire93 »

GAJAN wrote:I didnt meat cqb, I was thinking about close combat with guns not bayonets because g3s recoil and fire rate compared to x95 and there is a bit of balance in those optics. Someone said abou scopless weapons are better. Yes but not for long range fights which they are (bijar for example) fighting one side of valley to another one.
as an INFY squad(if you're the SL) you should always build ATGM,AA,and HMG emplacements on key locations so that the enemy wont expect you or maybe defensive areas for a flag, specially in a map like Bijar when combat happen from hill to hill, also combine arms are more in favor in this map.

A scope on a standard rifle wont do any good alone.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Feedback”