PRTA Feedback thread

Player feedback for all Project Reality: Battlefield 2 servers.
Post Reply
Wicca
Posts: 7336
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Wicca »

We can always improve balancing, it's difficult to nail down to an exact science, despite people claiming it to be easy.

We hope to do better.
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
pwner_pt
Posts: 59
Joined: 2016-11-24 13:32

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by pwner_pt »

PRTA please stop supporting and interacting with hackers. You are destroying the PR community. Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!


regards
Wicca
Posts: 7336
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Wicca »

pwner_pt wrote:PRTA please stop supporting and interacting with hackers. You are destroying the PR community. Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!


regards
Which 3 players are hacking, and show me their proof. Also, did other servers ban these hackers?
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
User avatar
Suchar
PR:BF2 Lead Developer
Posts: 2208
Joined: 2016-10-12 13:25
Location: Poland

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Suchar »

pwner_pt wrote:PRTA please stop supporting and interacting with hackers. You are destroying the PR community. Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!
Hi,

Let's have a look. The number of reported cheaters/griefers per community (or person) in the last year (on the forum):
PRTA: 71
Danesh: 2
FFG: 2
HOG: 1 (Daniel)

Yeah, why are we supporting hackers? :confused: Please don't generalize based on 1 (or, as you claim, 3?) cases.

Now, what other 2 cases are you talking about?

Regarding daniel: that's right, the admin team voted not to ban him (by a majority of the votes), which I am personally strongly against. Just, please, don't blame the whole of PRTA, just those who voted not to ban him. This is really demotivating to hear stuff like that while fighting cheaters.

Regards
Image
Inspect
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-07-28 18:33

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Inspect »

pwner_pt wrote:Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!
Very sad that PRTA doesn't ban hackers. But seriously though, if you've seen hackers on your server or on PRTA, make a report. If enough proof is provided, they'll be banned.

But I guess you're really talking about this:
pwner_pt wrote:to fight cheaters/hackers/banevaders/hashchangers instead of defending them over personal reasons.
New hash on a player does not automatically mean that a player is a hacker, and I'm pretty sure you know this too. What comes to griefing and ban evading, that's obviously not fit for an admin of any PR community. But I guess you agree that sharing all personal drama bans between PR servers would not be a good thing because there are different rulesets on different servers.

Your feedback would be greatly improved if there were something new you could provide and something new to discuss. Like additional evidence of some of the "harbored" hackers.
AlonTavor
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 2991
Joined: 2009-08-10 18:58

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by AlonTavor »

pwner_pt wrote:PRTA please stop supporting and interacting with hackers. You are destroying the PR community. Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!


regards
Can you explain what exactly are you referring to?
DogACTUAL
Posts: 879
Joined: 2016-05-21 01:13

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by DogACTUAL »

Not only did the DEVs totally throw off the CAS/AA balance and make TOWs useless against tanks, no that was not enough. They also had to introduce their most controversial change yet, a 16 character limit on player names.
------------------
''Mats literally does not give a single fuck what you, me or everybody else thinks the game should be like. He doesn't care if you, me or everybody else plays the game even.'' - Frontliner
CAS_ual_TY
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 926
Joined: 2016-01-04 12:30

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by CAS_ual_TY »

gotta respek alwaysbased
Imma pull out the ol' bans from CIA
Image
Image Image
CAS_ual_TY
PR:BF2 Contributor
Posts: 926
Joined: 2016-01-04 12:30

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by CAS_ual_TY »

pwner_pt wrote:PRTA please stop supporting and interacting with hackers. You are destroying the PR community. Evidence has been showing to the whole PR community already especially in three cases and they are still allowed to be active in your PRTA community. Ban these people and don't allow them to play on your server. Why are you supporting hackers?!


regards
You promised proof ages ago. Of PRTA DDoSing servers, protecting hackers and crashing other servers (something about !datadump idk). You havent delivered anything and now you come back.

Why you eat banana man?
Image
Image Image
RaNa-Rocxs
Posts: 533
Joined: 2016-06-12 09:51

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by RaNa-Rocxs »

Suchar wrote:Hi,

Let's have a look. The number of reported cheaters/griefers per community (or person) in the last year (on the forum):
PRTA: 71
Danesh: 2
FFG: 2
HOG: 1 (Daniel)

Yeah, why are we supporting hackers? :confused: Please don't generalize based on 1 (or, as you claim, 3?) cases.

Now, what other 2 cases are you talking about?

Regarding daniel: that's right, the admin team voted not to ban him (by a majority of the votes), which I am personally strongly against. Just, please, don't blame the whole of PRTA, just those who voted not to ban him. This is really demotivating to hear stuff like that while fighting cheaters.

Regards
How nice to see prta voting for them own cheaters to ban them, so Mr.Suchar nobody cares you are against that or not what about PR rules when you guys are defending your own guys with that the, if prta can't manage the justice for there own then stop fingering to another server, + must share with us that CD Hash key changer which one his and other using.
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Nate. »

Okay people this is enough now.

Take your concerns to a PM exchange or the Admin forums, this thread here will go back to Server Feedback.
Image
DogACTUAL
Posts: 879
Joined: 2016-05-21 01:13

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by DogACTUAL »

Regarding daniel: that's right, the admin team voted not to ban him (by a majority of the votes), which I am personally strongly against. Just, please, don't blame the whole of PRTA, just those who voted not to ban him. This is really demotivating to hear stuff like that while fighting cheaters.
This is actually hilarious. Nice mental gymnastics.

User Infracted for useless/unhelpful post content further derailing the thread -Nate
Last edited by Nate. on 2020-04-22 12:55, edited 2 times in total.
Not only did the DEVs totally throw off the CAS/AA balance and make TOWs useless against tanks, no that was not enough. They also had to introduce their most controversial change yet, a 16 character limit on player names.
------------------
''Mats literally does not give a single fuck what you, me or everybody else thinks the game should be like. He doesn't care if you, me or everybody else plays the game even.'' - Frontliner
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Nate. »

Last warning to get back to topic. 3 posts removed. This is Server Feedback.

Bring valid points, arguments & proof, not simple community drama.
Last edited by Nate. on 2020-04-22 20:56, edited 1 time in total.
Image
pwner_pt
Posts: 59
Joined: 2016-11-24 13:32

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by pwner_pt »

This is not a community drama. I'm telling you nicely. Proof has been posted a lot of times. Videos, serverlogs, IPlogs, hashlogs. I can do it again and again if you want to. The problem is, smth gonna change? No.

I don't want to particular shine light on a single case, since the rules for that are to report it to server forums. But take the best example DanielJ15.

Here I'm not reporting the player. I'm reporting the real issue. A server problem how you handle these things. This is server feedback.

You put high standards on other servers and cry everytime when someone's reporting a problem on your side. Stop being double standard.

Start helping the game out and not to destroy it. Players like these destroy OUR community and even your prta community. Don't protect them because they are your friends

I'm not personal attacking you. I just tell you what I see. Realize that.


If you gonna delete this again, as you did in the past, you'll see that this is a major censorship you guys tryna set up.


regards
AlonTavor
PR:BF2 Developer
Posts: 2991
Joined: 2009-08-10 18:58

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by AlonTavor »

@PRTA

Even if your claim is that he did not disrupt gameplay more than once, your stance of "Ban evading on other servers is not bad" is disappointing.
Do something about it.
InfantryGamer42
Posts: 495
Joined: 2016-03-16 16:01

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by InfantryGamer42 »

Could DEVs maybe put in server licence agreement for 1.6 that servers are forced to ban hackers that are proven? That way this vote issue will not come back anymore.
Wicca
Posts: 7336
Joined: 2008-01-05 14:53

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Wicca »

AlonTavor wrote:@PRTA

Even if your claim is that he did not disrupt gameplay more than once, your stance of "Ban evading on other servers is not bad" is disappointing.
Do something about it.
Any player who ever griefed once will now be permabanned from PRTA.

This includes current PR developers, moderators, PRTA staff members, and any player.
Any proof presented to us, that they have griefed, will result in a permanent ban.
Xact Wicca is The Joker. That is all.
Inspect
Posts: 9
Joined: 2016-07-28 18:33

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Inspect »

pwner_pt wrote:If you gonna delete this again, as you did in the past, you'll see that this is a major censorship you guys tryna set up.
I'm fairly certain PRTA staff has no way of deleting posts on this feedback thread, but instead it's up to Realitymod moderators. And I think player reports done to PRTA forums are (nowadays) rarely deleted or edited unless they contain insults or IP addresses or similar. And when threads are locked, you can still PM moderators and they will add your post to the thread.
InfantryGamer42 wrote:Could DEVs maybe put in server licence agreement for 1.6 that servers are forced to ban hackers that are proven? That way this vote issue will not come back anymore.
Isn't this kinda already a thing though? When provided indisputable proof, I think all servers work fine in this sense. The problems arise with the edgecases where people have different interpretations about what is "clear hacking" and what is not. I know a handful of cases which have been discussed ad nauseum on PRTA at least and I guess it's similar on all servers.
pwner_pt
Posts: 59
Joined: 2016-11-24 13:32

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by pwner_pt »

Inspect wrote:The problems arise with the edgecases where people have different interpretations about what is "clear hacking" and what is not. I know a handful of cases which have been discussed ad nauseum on PRTA at least and I guess it's similar on all servers.
You would have known if a previous post of a user wouldn't have deleted by a DEV that attitude is double standard and favors your community because he belongs to it.

Here is one of the statement that got deleted from another user who critized your grievances.
How do you think a player that gets banned is able to get a new HASH in seconds without using any sort of hacking tools?

Stop cooperating with hackers.
Stop being double standard.
Don't point out your fingers on other communities if yourself is fucking up.

Get that shit together before v1.6 is comming out. That things must stop. But it won't stop if you don't go new ways and stop the **** you did before.


regards
Nate.
Forum Moderator
Posts: 3018
Joined: 2012-07-09 20:44

Re: PRTA Feedback thread

Post by Nate. »

pwner_pt wrote:You would have known if a previous post of a user wouldn't have deleted by a DEV that attitude is double standard and favors your community because he belongs to it.
As I explained to you before. Posts in this discussion are only moderated by me and Mineral. If this was another server's feedback thread, we'd have done the same.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Server Feedback”