More servers would have be around if he had max 90 players?

[Brotherscompany]

So like for 2 years now its been the norm to have only 1 server up since no one wants to be bothered by seeding and by the time the round ends there is a high likelyhood of getting a slot


So do you think if the max players for a server would have been 90 people would have been more keen in seeding and perhaps it could have resulted in servers lasting longer?

Honestly l guess 45 vs 45 wouldn't have affected the gameplay that much in a negative way

[Coalz101]

So like for 2 years now its been the norm to have only 1 server up since no one wants to be bothered by seeding and by the time the round ends there is a high likelyhood of getting a slot


So do you think if the max players for a server would have been 90 people would have been more keen in seeding and perhaps it could have resulted in servers lasting longer?

Honestly l guess 45 vs 45 wouldn't have affected the gameplay that much in a negative way

As long as the total pop does not go below 80 and you won't get a bad game it will be fine in my opinion. Just remember there is less people to carry/fuck up a team now but it theres a strong majority of bad players there will always be a gameplay issue. Rules will need to be more strict as to get as good of a game as possible.

[AlonTavor]

I also think the game just works better with slightly less players regardless, but I don't people will like that.

[Outlawz7]

I think 90 would be same as 100. Might as well go back to BF2's 64 then or go the other way and add player count to fit everyone onto one server.

[dcm]

I thought about reopening a server, but I'd rather not deal with all the petty bullshit.

And I like to run my servers like a biker bar. Do what you want but dont fuck with the house.