Yes, I know it is not accurate, but visually there is nothing we can do about it unless we make our own model. And even if we were to code it as having an authentic loadout (which I suspect is what EA thought they were doing since the few photos I've seen of the Q-5 only seem to have those 4 racks loaded), you just said you don't want it anyway. Guess we just won't bother including anything more for the PLAAF.Griffon2-6 wrote:Well, the armament for the Q-5 is not accurate at the moment, and I'm pretty sure the PLAAF would use the Su-30 or J-11 to fulfill the Q-5's role. So can we just not have the Q-5, period? I mean, I might not put it in my map, but someone will, and it'll suck.
Q-5 Fantan
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
-
-=ToD=-KNIFE
- Posts: 268
- Joined: 2006-12-04 22:41
Just give the PLAAF what they use today as what they use today is still advanced stuff, the Su-30MK111 and J11 and both still excellent in thier roles, though the J11 is showing age but there has been sparks going round saying China i think is interested in the Marvelous Su-37, mind you then the Americans will want a F/A-22 T-Rex, wait Raptor, oh and have you seen what the Real Life Su-30 can carry???
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
And today for close-air support they have 200+ Q-5s. And in-game, nobody is getting the Su-37 or the F-22A, so they can suck it up.-=ToD=-KNIFE wrote:Just give the PLAAF what they use today as what they use today is still advanced stuff, the Su-30MK111 and J11 and both still excellent in thier roles, though the J11 is showing age but there has been sparks going round saying China i think is interested in the Marvelous Su-37, mind you then the Americans will want a F/A-22 T-Rex, wait Raptor, oh and have you seen what the Real Life Su-30 can carry???

