Horse in P.R.?

BlackwaterEddie · Post by **BlackwaterEddie** » 2007-02-21 22:10

Guerra wrote:Horses for insurgents? Thats just insulting. Camels too.

You know these countries are developed right? Even poor countries have an abundance of cars, motorcycles, etc.

Maybe if it was a WWI game, then horses would be interesting, but for modern combat horses would be silly and way too hard to design and script for.

Why do the maps all make Iraq and Afghanistan look like a shithole?

As for the horse, jesus christ, probably the funniest thing ive heard and the thing id most like to see.....Passenger on the back?, oh please, let me at it

Wattershed · Post by **Wattershed** » 2007-02-21 22:24

LOL! Ehh.. Why not have the horse strapped in C4 and "allah akbar" as a honk?

Post by **Dunehunter** » 2007-02-21 22:34

Didn't US spec ops in Afghanistan use horses?

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2007-02-21 22:41

dunehunter wrote:Didn't US spec ops in Afghanistan use horses?

Yes, they did, and still do. Many also receive training in handling pack animals.

foodmaniac2003 · Post by **foodmaniac2003** » 2007-02-21 22:52

IIRC complex animal animations are impossible to do in BF2 and previous BF versions. It is however, possible in BF2142 due to the fact that the mechs use these kind of animations.

Horses move really strange.... you people ever play that BF1942 Civil War Mod with the horses O.o?

00SoldierofFortune00 · Post by **00SoldierofFortune00** » 2007-02-21 22:56

SGT.Collado wrote:Call me crazy, but wouldn't it be cool to have horses for the insurgents. It seems like they need some other type of transportation. Can you guys think the physics engine can do that?

-indiana jones, here I come!

Yea, now I can hide my IED's in roadkill if you know what I mean...

BRedG · Post by **BRedG** » 2007-02-21 22:58

Instead of planes we could also have the insurgents grab hold of large birds!

foodmaniac2003 · Post by **foodmaniac2003** » 2007-02-21 23:17

FH Dev did this for a little joke

No, it's not an ingame

Wipeout · Post by **Wipeout** » 2007-02-22 00:15

OMFG.. Ya'll are stupider then I thought.. And obviously don't read..

One there are rarely any horses in the middle east because they need alot of water, that water would be used by the insurgents themselves not for the animals.

Second, they would use camels, camels don't move to quickly.

Third, lmaolmalfjdoiewfjaljdsvjwoifjalmao

Fourth, wow stupify

DISCLAIMER.. I'm harsh, I'm an ***; get over it or become an emo, have fun and reply to this thread at your accord..

V3N0N_br · Post by **V3N0N_br** » 2007-02-22 00:29

At horse will definitely be my favorite

Post by **GeZe** » 2007-02-22 00:30

SGT.Collado wrote:Call me crazy, but wouldn't it be cool to have horses for the insurgents.

No.

SGT.Collado · Post by **SGT.Collado** » 2007-02-22 00:31

GeZe wrote:No.

yes it would, don't deny it

BetterDeadThanRed · Post by **BetterDeadThanRed** » 2007-02-22 00:32

Short version: No

Long version: Hell no.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2007-02-22 00:33

Sorry, Collado, this thread is just getting ridiculous.