PLA and MEC using SA-7??

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
midnightcowboy
Posts: 54
Joined: 2007-02-22 04:38

PLA and MEC using SA-7??

Post by midnightcowboy »

The Strela-2 (SA-7) is over 30 years old, the Russians have developed and exported much better MANPADS since then! I propose giving the MEC SA-18 or at least SA-16 MANPADS and China their indigenous QW-3.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ ... /sa-18.htm
http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surface ... le/qw3.asp
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

i suggest that before , nobody answer :(

http://realitymod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15607
Mekstizzle
Posts: 882
Joined: 2006-10-30 17:15

Post by Mekstizzle »

I think it's because it'll hardly make a difference, they don't look that different either. The SA-7 is already effective enough and will be even more in the upcoming server patch, so there really isn't a need to replace it. Although i do agree that the Chinese should get their own MANPAD. These are just cosmetic things though really, if the grail sucked ingame then i'd agree though.

Gameplay > Content - once the gameplay is sorted. Content ftw. :razz:
Aljen
Posts: 399
Joined: 2006-11-14 14:48

Post by Aljen »

"The laser guidance enables the QW-3 missile to be immune to the heat flares"
pilots would hate that ;)

I think SA7 is ok for now (although it is IR and not radar guided in RL so I dont think enemy pilot would know that he is being targeted)
Truth needs no law to enforce it
Evolution: The realization by the organism that those things inside the white lab coats are pretty damned tasty!
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”