Project Reality on Wikipedia

Post by **GeZe** » 2007-02-28 05:34

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Reality

I had created an article long ago, but it was deleted becuase they considered PR not notable, but now with the awards, and coverage from major gaming websites, I think PR is notable, and I don't think we have to worry about getting the article deleted.

I spent some time creating the article today, but it still needs a lot more, please add images, text etc.

But! Don't add stuff like "this is the best mod ever" or shit like that, keep it neutral and informative please.

lonelyjew · Post by **lonelyjew** » 2007-02-28 05:41

Nice job. One thing I would add asap is credit to the devs.

Post by **GeZe** » 2007-02-28 05:44

lonelyjew wrote:Nice job. One thing I would add asap is credit to the devs.

in the box section Developer(s) I put "Project Reality Devs", I didn't want to list them all becuase it would take up to much space

Post by **fuzzhead** » 2007-02-28 05:46

make sure to link the the PR Guide Wiki

Top_Cat_AxJnAt · Post by **Top_Cat_AxJnAt** » 2007-02-28 05:54

wuhoo, my ONly point of access for PR information and possibly delayed news at my College (damn RM safety and all those who employ it for their twisted, sick reasons!).

Looks good but "Project Reality focuses on changing that unrealistic gameplay into realistic gameplay.",i dont think it shoudl be "that "because you have nto already stated that BF2 has unrealistic gameplay. Therefore i think the would be more appropriate.

Post by **eggman** » 2007-02-28 06:28

tyvm

Dylan · Post by **Dylan** » 2007-02-28 06:51

Top _Cat the great wrote:wuhoo, my ONly point of access for PR information and possibly delayed news at my College (damn RM safety and all those who employ it for their twisted, sick reasons!).

Looks good but "Project Reality focuses on changing that unrealistic gameplay into realistic gameplay.",i dont think it shoudl be "that "because you have nto already stated that BF2 has unrealistic gameplay. Therefore i think the would be more appropriate.

Topcat actually correcting someones grammar. Now that is a first for me.

Good job on the wiki.

Post by **Fullforce** » 2007-02-28 10:48

I find it funny that one man can do a better job than an entire R-PUB team at making a wiki page for PR.

@GeZe: http://prguide.realitymod.com/index.php ... ia_Article
This is what we've been working on, but you've done a better job anyway. heh. We were just about to roll it onto wikipedia like today

EDIT: Edited some stuff in the article so it better conforms to wiki standards

masterofflama · Post by **masterofflama** » 2007-02-28 11:15

wow nice job,

-=TB=-liebgott · Post by **-=TB=-liebgott** » 2007-02-28 11:36

good job

little fault:

USMC vs MEC
Airport

i think it is GB vs MEC

Leo · Post by **Leo** » 2007-02-28 11:51

Make GeZe an R-Pub!

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-02-28 15:05

Once again, I have to say...

GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB!

Wasteland · Post by **Wasteland** » 2007-02-28 15:52

Nice work. I cleaned up the first section a bit for clarity, and to reduce a couple redundancies. I changed the meaning in one part, which I believe was originally inaccurate. If I'm wrong please go ahead and change it.

You had originally said that the devs aimed to change the original game engine to make gameply more realistic.

I said they used the original game engine. I don't think they changed the core of the game.

And uh, oh yeah. GEZE FOR R-PUB!

Mekstizzle · Post by **Mekstizzle** » 2007-02-28 16:45

Awesome stuff Geez. I say make him an R-Pub-server-noob aswell. And clean that clique up aswell, there's some wastemans in there that don't do shit!

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-02-28 16:52

bosco wrote:
GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB! GeZe for R-PUB!

onetwotree

Clypp · Post by **Clypp** » 2007-02-28 17:11

Agreed. Making the wikiarticle should be an entrance requirement for all R-PUBs.

MMad · Post by **MMad** » 2007-02-28 20:33

Nice job in the article so far, but I don't think there's much point in listing all maps for the game, and there's definately no reason to make new page links for each of the maps - this is the kind of thing that gets articles deleted for non-notability. I think it'd be better to describe the different kinds of enviroments the mod takes place in, how they're different from the vanilla game and how it goes toward making the mod notable.

Remember, Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia and articles should be encyclopedic. The PR WP entry should not a PR manual, nor an advertisement - it should be a factual, dispassionate account of the mod.

I might take some time later to put together a suggestion for an alternate layout, will post it on the Talk page if so. Still though, good job on putting it up there.

Post by **GeZe** » 2007-02-28 23:24

Yay, thanks guys. I agree about the maps. (I did not put them there, someone else did) I think it would be more appropriate to show the general environments and such, and general gameplay features. On other game pages on wikipedia, there is a separate page with all the maps, but I don't think PR is that notable yet to have multiple pages about it.

SteelRainFilms · Post by **SteelRainFilms** » 2007-02-28 23:28

I noticed a particular sentence or 2 sentences actually, that may have some small grammar mistakes. I'll highlight them in DARK BLACK

"Most aspects of Battlefield 2 that has the capacity to be modified (such as physical properties of weapons and vehicles) has been tweaked to reflect its real life counterpart. From armored vehicles to jeeps, to small arms, to aircraft."

Change those 2 "Has" to "Have". I might be wrong though, idk.

eddie · Post by **eddie** » 2007-02-28 23:35

No, you're right. I'm also editing the a/c side of Wiki, so if anyone spots anything wrong please tell me. Note, I haven't done much yet.