A couple suggestions from me.

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Post Reply
Cherni
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2006-08-19 23:23

A couple suggestions from me.

Post by Cherni »

Well just wanted to congratulate the PR team on how great .5 is, but I just had some suggestions for this great mod.


1. Pilot kit should get MP5 or MP7 for Brits and the equivalent for PLA and MEC.

2. For the C4 detonator on the Insergents should have a wired cellphone.

3.For the Humvee transport should actually be able to carry troops in the back. Fine cat man

4. For insergents, mount AT rocket/gun on the back of a Technichal.


And thats all I have, but please consider :D


Thanks
Cherni
Last edited by Cherni on 2007-03-03 15:54, edited 1 time in total.
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
Posts: 3215
Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13

Post by Top_Cat_AxJnAt »

3) - Humvee, read and learn: http://realitymod.com/forum/t5588-jeeps-ideasrant.html, pages and pages of thought/blood, sweat and emotion for what.... (see post Date on link)!
Soulja
Posts: 611
Joined: 2006-10-09 20:50

Technical w/ Recoiless Rifle

Post by Soulja »

Is there any way that some point along the way you guys could remodel the technical to have a 106mm M40 Recoilless Rifle or some other model of a recoilless on the back instead of a .50? I've heard of insurgents in Iraq and especially Afghanistan having these things and shooting US light armor and vehicles. I think it would give the insurgents a bit better AT capability so you don't end up with the tank sitting half a mile away and is invincible due to the supply hummer sitting next to it.
In Game Name: Linelor
X-Fire User: ogikarma
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

agree
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

Like this?
Image
Image
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

thats not exactly a technical but something like that would be grat
El_Vikingo
Posts: 4877
Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50

Post by El_Vikingo »

1. The Pilots fly, they don't fight on foot. Hence "the pilot kit".

2.Please search before you suggest ANYTHING. This will be done for future releases.

3.I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. The Humvee does transport troops. 5 + driver.

4. This has already been suggested. It's even on the main page for christ sake.
[DVB] TRIggS
Posts: 397
Joined: 2006-10-15 01:51

Post by [DVB] TRIggS »

The insurgents do need more that wimpy RPG. A technical would be great but what about giving them a Heavy AT. Just a pick up kit of an RPG with a larger shell with 2 rounds. 4 hits to the back should take it out.
Image
Smitty4212
Posts: 322
Joined: 2006-07-24 02:15

Post by Smitty4212 »

If an Abrams is sitting far away with a supply truck next to it, there's a simple solution-- don't go near it.

The whole point of playing as insurgents is to make the USMC come to you.
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

yeash dont give more toy to the insurgents because they are crapy in RL and they dont use AT technicals :roll:
Soulja
Posts: 611
Joined: 2006-10-09 20:50

Post by Soulja »

Smitty4212 wrote:If an Abrams is sitting far away with a supply truck next to it, there's a simple solution-- don't go near it.

The whole point of playing as insurgents is to make the USMC come to you.

Why is there always someone who has to post something like this? I was just using an example. Damn.
In Game Name: Linelor
X-Fire User: ogikarma
Soulja
Posts: 611
Joined: 2006-10-09 20:50

Post by Soulja »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:yeash dont give more toy to the insurgents because they are crapy in RL and they dont use AT technicals :roll:
They use them, sure as hell. I'll get a picture if i must.....
In Game Name: Linelor
X-Fire User: ogikarma
smith
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-03-02 19:11

Post by smith »

bosco wrote:Like this?
Image
That is actually a russian made vehicle. Somalia FTW
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

Soulja wrote:They use them, sure as hell. I'll get a picture if i must.....
was sarcasm :-P , I m tired of coments like : "insurgents need to work together to take down a cobra with rpgs" of "rung away from m1a2 because insurgent do that .."
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

A technical AT vehicle would be great.
The insurge tank is only useful as an ambush tool but even getting it up to a point where it is useful is very hard due the air cover.
A technical would not be as powerful but it would be faster and therefore have a better chance of surviving long enough to hide in a good ambush position.
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
Soulja
Posts: 611
Joined: 2006-10-09 20:50

Post by Soulja »

Opps, didn't look at this post earlier and nothing came up on search, my bad.
In Game Name: Linelor
X-Fire User: ogikarma
TristanYockell
Posts: 340
Joined: 2007-01-21 05:03

Post by TristanYockell »

I would most deffinatly be all for this, I would rather there be other old 50's-60's russian made armoured vehicles available to the insurgents though. The BDRM-2 is a joke.
I really wish I was good at modeling and modding :( .

Perhaps one of these mounted on the back would work?.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-11_recoilless_rifle

Or even a B-10, both are soviet design and would be feasible.

Type 65 made by china maybe? -- http://www.sinodefence.com/army/crewser ... 20mm3a.jpg
Last edited by TristanYockell on 2007-03-03 21:51, edited 1 time in total.
Cherni
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2006-08-19 23:23

Post by Cherni »

But actually putting the BF2 at gun on the technichal..
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”