M1A1/USI/PR/BlackSand questions
-
ReadMenace
- Posts: 2567
- Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05
M1A1/USI/PR/BlackSand questions
What is the nature of the relationship between BlackSand Studio, US Intervention and Project Reality? How much content sharing is going on between PR & USI? Would it be possible for PR to use USI's M1? I really think the Abrams needs another MG. 
-
eddie
- Posts: 5495
- Joined: 2005-05-09 20:42
We're currently using the F-16C, A-10, BRDM-2, support jeep, TOW jeep, SU-25, UAZ, Avenger (AA "Humvee"). These are all from USI.
Edit: Yes, the real life M1A2 SEP has 3 MG's:
1 for the loader: A 7.62mm M240C on a skate mount.
1 for the gunner: A co-axial 7.62mm M240C.
1 for the commander: A .50 cal M2 MG on a flex mount.
Edit: Yes, the real life M1A2 SEP has 3 MG's:
1 for the loader: A 7.62mm M240C on a skate mount.
1 for the gunner: A co-axial 7.62mm M240C.
1 for the commander: A .50 cal M2 MG on a flex mount.
Last edited by eddie on 2007-03-15 16:26, edited 1 time in total.

-
El_Vikingo
- Posts: 4877
- Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50
-
Jedimushroom
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: 2006-07-18 19:03
-
$kelet0r
- Posts: 1418
- Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04
it's not worth the effort.ReadMenace wrote:What is the nature of the relationship between BlackSand Studio, US Intervention and Project Reality? How much content sharing is going on between PR & USI? Would it be possible for PR to use USI's M1? I really think the Abrams needs another MG.![]()
Who is loading the main gun if the loader is arsing about with the M240? It's not realistic to allow that option without creating a loader. And imo there are already too many positions in the tank - a commander giving orders to the 'driver' and a gunner giving orders to the 'loader' would have been sufficient.
-
77SiCaRiO77
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 4982
- Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44
-
Top_Cat_AxJnAt
- Posts: 3215
- Joined: 2006-02-02 17:13



