Wouldn't it be more realistic if it was possible to climbe trees? You could include them like a vehicle where u can use your own weapon and just enter/exit them like a vehicle.
I really dont know what to say to this. First off, there would probably be a good amount of lag due to the fact of having all these "vehicles" placed all over the map.
My only consern about trees is, as of now, branches can stop tank shells..
Cool idea but tbh you wouldent find soldiers climbing trees as a firing point. You are seen easyer and when you are spotted your in trouble becaause you have no immediate escape or cover.
What if you fall and break an arm? Imagine trying to get health care in the middle of a desert or jungle surrounded by enemies? It'd be fun sniping though.
yeah the japanese did alot of that in WWII, till the marines decided step 1 of the amphibious landing was to shoot the hell out of any trees lining the beach, even if the sniper survived that, he was toast after 1 shot.
maby, for climbilg/sniping, you could make the tree climb able like the ladders. Then youd need a small space to stand/ lie on at the top of the "ladder"
BrokenArrow wrote:the climbing trees thing has alreadt been shot down.
why i know if i was a fighter not in the military that i would use a tree to hide or fight sure you would die fast but hey nobody trained you not to get ina tree.... see my point!!
kitomer wrote:why i know if i was a fighter not in the military that i would use a tree to hide or fight sure you would die fast but hey nobody trained you not to get ina tree.... see my point!!
IMO I think being in a tree would make you more of a target than conseal you, for Bf2 anyways...
IRL it also does. Infact climbing a tree during war time when engaed in active combat would be the dumbest thing other then swapping your gun for a broomstick to prod them with.
EDIT: please dont now start a list of things dumber then the above