To much focus on USMC, suggestions for MEC and china
-
worst 3
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 2005-08-13 07:19
To much focus on USMC, suggestions for MEC and china
As you may have notice all the things that I have heard and seen are focused on the US side and no other and that is going to make the game very unfair for the other sides. This will make the game not much fun, so I think we should come up with some idea for the other side like veclies and more.
Hear are a quick few more are to come with internet links to later.
First the type 95 rifle for the chin it is under powered for a gun with a shit larger then a 5.62 (it is 5.8 )
and possibly the chin’s 1. Type 63A Amphibious Tank
a side note head shots should kill a person so a medic cant heal them.
I hope some of the idea I will give and other people will balance the game with various things that don’t just match the othere teams exactaly.
keep on topic plezz you can argue an idea a little no trashing the other guy.
ill post more soon for mec..
Hear are a quick few more are to come with internet links to later.
First the type 95 rifle for the chin it is under powered for a gun with a shit larger then a 5.62 (it is 5.8 )
and possibly the chin’s 1. Type 63A Amphibious Tank
a side note head shots should kill a person so a medic cant heal them.
I hope some of the idea I will give and other people will balance the game with various things that don’t just match the othere teams exactaly.
keep on topic plezz you can argue an idea a little no trashing the other guy.
ill post more soon for mec..
Last edited by worst 3 on 2005-09-20 01:36, edited 1 time in total.
-
Omniassiah
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 2005-09-18 21:56
-
worst 3
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 2005-08-13 07:19
KA-50 BLACK SHARK ATTACK HELICOPTER don’t know to much about it but it looks very maneuverable and is good at not just ground but AA too. it also has decent armor. The prop design could give it superior handling and more.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/ka50/
now I don’t know for sure if the MEC use it but they use mostly Russian gear. Don’t think the Russians only use it they would not have the money.
Also this HTURM SELF PROPELLED ANTI-TANK GUIDED MISSILE SYSTEM agin Russian but it could be used in maps to take out the American tanks with out giving then an effective AP vacuole and if you want there gear cheaper.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/shturm/
I like this web sight but ill look in more to
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/ka50/
now I don’t know for sure if the MEC use it but they use mostly Russian gear. Don’t think the Russians only use it they would not have the money.
Also this HTURM SELF PROPELLED ANTI-TANK GUIDED MISSILE SYSTEM agin Russian but it could be used in maps to take out the American tanks with out giving then an effective AP vacuole and if you want there gear cheaper.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/shturm/
I like this web sight but ill look in more to
-
worst 3
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 2005-08-13 07:19
quote:
Yes, most people on the forums are suggesting a lot of things for US forces, but the developers are working on things for the other forces, including the addition of UK forces.
im just brain stormeing kind of the idea of the page to some ideas of thing that might be used i know people can tell me if it is used and more.
im talking more about the Opposing forces to them MEC and China particularly, and a new foce ex: Korea
(i dont know alot about the MEC but they use alot of russian stuff. So im going to use russian things most of the time for mec if they dont use it tell me i dont know)
Yes, most people on the forums are suggesting a lot of things for US forces, but the developers are working on things for the other forces, including the addition of UK forces.
im just brain stormeing kind of the idea of the page to some ideas of thing that might be used i know people can tell me if it is used and more.
im talking more about the Opposing forces to them MEC and China particularly, and a new foce ex: Korea
(i dont know alot about the MEC but they use alot of russian stuff. So im going to use russian things most of the time for mec if they dont use it tell me i dont know)
Last edited by worst 3 on 2005-09-20 01:42, edited 1 time in total.
-
Super62
- Posts: 92
- Joined: 2004-12-20 06:57
Too much US stuff? LOL LOL LOL
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=13
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=13
-
Beckwith
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00
anyone who has played POE would know that that thing sux and its impossible to make that design fly properly in the BF engineworst 3 wrote:KA-50 BLACK SHARK ATTACK HELICOPTER don’t know to much about it but it looks very maneuverable and is good at not just ground but AA too. it also has decent armor. The prop design could give it superior handling and more.
http://www.army-technology.com/projects/ka50/

-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
The Type 95 is pretty much already in-game; the Type 97 used in the Chinese special operations class is just a 5.56mm version of the Type 95.worst 3 wrote:First the type 95 rifle for the chin it is under powered for a gun with a shit larger then a 5.62 (it is 5.![]()
That is a possibility. The Hind may be the most widely used attack helicopter in the world. It is supposed to be included in the Battlefield 2: Special Forces expansion (whether it will actually be is always uncertain with EA), but I'm not sure if we will be modeling one or not. The most widely used model seems to be the Hind-D, but if we can find other variants in service in possible threat states, we will try to include those as well.Omniassiah wrote:Any chance of getting a Hind in the game? Know the iraqis had a few of them.
Yes, most people on the forums are suggesting a lot of things for US forces, but the developers are working on things for the other forces, including the addition of UK forces.Scribble wrote:Though it cant be helped guven the nationality of the mod-base, the focus of the mod is rather too overwhealmingly on the US forces.
No, the MEC do not use it. The Russians barely even use it. As with the Mi-28, there are only a few prototypes that have allegedly been pressed into service in Chechnya at some point, but I have not seen a source that confirms this. It will not be included in the mod.worst 3 wrote:KA-50 BLACK SHARK ATTACK HELICOPTER don’t know to much about it but it looks very maneuverable and is good at not just ground but AA too. it also has decent armor. The prop design could give it superior handling and more.
now I don’t know for sure if the MEC use it but they use mostly Russian gear. Don’t think the Russians only use it they would not have the money.
Just so you know, the BF2 timeline may not be kept, so you may not see some of the things (on all the teams) that are in the game now in later versions of PR.
-
Beckwith
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 2005-03-25 17:00
-
BrokenArrow
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 2005-06-07 18:54
-
worst 3
- Posts: 253
- Joined: 2005-08-13 07:19
who is part of the mec, i wish knew more about them.
any way i was thinking if there any thing like iraq some soldires did drugs and used adrenaline so they can take more hits or they can be shot by bulets run out of hp but fight for a 2 seconds more befor dieing to give them a advantage. some times the US troops could unload multiple rounds in to a guy he keep runing shoot back and then climb a wall and get way. untill i know more about the mec i dont think ill put to many new ideas about them in. looked around to find out more but did not see any thing.
any way i was thinking if there any thing like iraq some soldires did drugs and used adrenaline so they can take more hits or they can be shot by bulets run out of hp but fight for a 2 seconds more befor dieing to give them a advantage. some times the US troops could unload multiple rounds in to a guy he keep runing shoot back and then climb a wall and get way. untill i know more about the mec i dont think ill put to many new ideas about them in. looked around to find out more but did not see any thing.
-
BrokenArrow
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 3071
- Joined: 2005-06-07 18:54
-
{GD}Snake13
- Posts: 142
- Joined: 2005-09-09 13:52
-
Eddie Baker
- Posts: 6945
- Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00
The Type 81 family (7.62 x 39mm) is the primary weapon in service with most of the PLA at this time.


Type 95 is in limited issue to elements within the PLA special operations, airborne and marine units, but sources indicate that it has been a disappointment and will not enter full rate production until the "bugs" are worked out.
As for the Type 91 35mm underslung grenade launcher, I have not seen much information on it. The information I have seen only lists riot-control ammunition types. Aside from that model, I know of no other underslung, spin-stabilized grenade launchers in service with the PLA; they may rely on rifle grenades and their squad Type 69 (RPG-7) gunners for close-support.


Type 95 is in limited issue to elements within the PLA special operations, airborne and marine units, but sources indicate that it has been a disappointment and will not enter full rate production until the "bugs" are worked out.
As for the Type 91 35mm underslung grenade launcher, I have not seen much information on it. The information I have seen only lists riot-control ammunition types. Aside from that model, I know of no other underslung, spin-stabilized grenade launchers in service with the PLA; they may rely on rifle grenades and their squad Type 69 (RPG-7) gunners for close-support.


