AT4 Indoors

Jimmy_Smack · Post by **Jimmy_Smack** » 2007-04-07 21:47

Ok, so I was watching Futureweapons on Discovery channel today and it was on the new AT4 that can be fired indoors. With the old AT4 if fired indoors, the blast pressure from the rear would reflect off the walls inside and kill the person shooting. I dont know if this is possible with the BF2 engine but I think it would add a nice touch of realism if an AT4, fired indoors, would kill the person firing and people around him. The only problem I could see you guys coming across is distinguishing when a person is indoors or not. Just a thought!
Of course, this would apply to the other light AT weapons also

Good Luck on 0.6!

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2007-04-07 21:53

Jimmy_Smack wrote:Ok, so I was watching Futureweapons on Discovery channel today and it was on the new AT4 that can be fired indoors. With the old AT4 if fired indoors, the blast pressure from the rear would reflect off the walls inside and kill the person shooting. I dont know if this is possible with the BF2 engine but I think it would add a nice touch of realism if an AT4, fired indoors, would kill the person firing and people around him. The only problem I could see you guys coming across is distinguishing when a person is indoors or not. Just a thought!
Of course, this would apply to the other light AT weapons also

Good Luck on 0.6!

I had to stop reading after I read the bold :/ Everyone watches futureweapons then comes on here about how PR should add the corner shot.

DirtyHarry88 · Post by **DirtyHarry88** » 2007-04-07 21:56

Desertfox wrote:I had to stop reading after I read the bold :/ Everyone watches futureweapons then comes on here about how PR should add the corner shot.

Well maybe if you read the whole thing you'd realise what he was actually saying.

G.Drew · Post by **G.Drew** » 2007-04-07 21:56

i need teh Discovery channel if tht stuff is on

Semi · Post by **Semi** » 2007-04-07 22:23

This isn't only an AT4 problem, but a problem with all anti-tank systems without a "soft-launch" feature.

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2007-04-07 22:25

lol ok, I read it and this actually is a good idea

Sorry =(

[uBp]Irish · Post by **[uBp]Irish** » 2007-04-07 23:07

always so quick to jump to conclusions desert... tsk tsk tsk

DirtyHarry88 · Post by **DirtyHarry88** » 2007-04-07 23:08

Desertfox wrote:lol ok, I read it and this actually is a good idea

Sorry =(

Naughty naughty.

How is your server without my master-class?

My 9800pro jacked it in so haven't played PR in ages, and won't be able to for another month or so.

youm0nt · Post by **youm0nt** » 2007-04-07 23:12

Hahaha, I was watching that that episode on Future Weapons too! I was going to suggest it after watching the episode, but I was like, "Nah, they'll just say it's impossible/hardcoded"

PlayPR! · Post by **PlayPR!** » 2007-04-08 02:31

youm0nt wrote:Hahaha, I was watching that that episode on Future Weapons too! I was going to suggest it after watching the episode, but I was like, "Nah, they'll just say it's impossible/hardcoded"

Damn you hardcodiness!