SLAM vs Tank
-
Lowe
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2007-03-09 12:03
-
Superior Mind
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 2007-02-15 01:55
-
Lothrian
- Posts: 795
- Joined: 2006-10-02 12:46
-
Semi
- Posts: 103
- Joined: 2007-03-31 15:07
Pretty much.Lothrian wrote:Yeah, I never much understood the use of the SLAMs. They are timed so the only uses I can think of are against
... ok thats actually quite a lot ... I shall shhhh
- Parked Light Vehicle
- Parked APC
- Enemy Rally Point
- Enemy AA Placements
- Destructable terrain (Fencing)
Keep in mind that they also stick to the target. Throwing some on a passing APC will damage it badly.
-
Count Zero
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 2007-04-10 04:50
-
DirtyHarry88
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 2006-12-24 18:41
Is a SLAM not an EFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosivel ... penetrator
So would it not be more likely to take out the people in a vehicle than the vehicle itself?
So would it not be more likely to take out the people in a vehicle than the vehicle itself?
The IED Master 
-
JDFryer
- Posts: 47
- Joined: 2007-03-21 22:00
It certainly looks like one and they are primarily designed to blast through armour. Same principle behing AT missiles such as the Milan. Charge creates a slug of molten copper which will blast through a good bit of armourDirtyHarry88 wrote:Is a SLAM not an EFP? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosivel ... penetrator
So would it not be more likely to take out the people in a vehicle than the vehicle itself?
-
DirtyHarry88
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: 2006-12-24 18:41
http://tech.military.com/equipment/view ... -slam.htmlJDFryer wrote:It certainly looks like one and they are primarily designed to blast through armour. Same principle behing AT missiles such as the Milan. Charge creates a slug of molten copper which will blast through a good bit of armour
The IED Master 
-
Jimmy_Smack
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 2007-02-07 16:11
-
El_Vikingo
- Posts: 4877
- Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50
-
Lowe
- Posts: 17
- Joined: 2007-03-09 12:03
Fair enough, I guess in that respect I was being a touch Vanilla.
The situation was that the tank was a target of opportunity that was in between my spec ops squad and their main base on EJOD. It was causing no end of trouble for our side by staying out the way and using its optics to pick people off trying to make it to north desert. Several AT guys had tried unsuccessfully to take it out. We managed to sneak up to tank and thought whilst we were so close it would be rude not to, no?
3 of us planted SLAMs and did one, expecting to at least disable the tank but like I say it drove off. In the end I called an artillery strike on it and that did the job
The situation was that the tank was a target of opportunity that was in between my spec ops squad and their main base on EJOD. It was causing no end of trouble for our side by staying out the way and using its optics to pick people off trying to make it to north desert. Several AT guys had tried unsuccessfully to take it out. We managed to sneak up to tank and thought whilst we were so close it would be rude not to, no?
3 of us planted SLAMs and did one, expecting to at least disable the tank but like I say it drove off. In the end I called an artillery strike on it and that did the job
-
El_Vikingo
- Posts: 4877
- Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50






