Can we get this sniper?

Golden7B · Post by **Golden7B** » 2007-05-05 21:50

specs: http://www.cheytac.com/M-200.html

This is my kind of night: I watch Future Weapons on Discovery channel and then play PR all night.....

this gun is crazy: 3 rounds on target at 2530 yards!!!

Blackhawk 5 · Post by **Blackhawk 5** » 2007-05-05 21:55

not everything on future weapons is good

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-05-05 21:56

is that a cannon? O_o

LiquidSnake · Post by **LiquidSnake** » 2007-05-05 22:14

Its the cannon of the LAV 25!

*joking*

=Romagnolo= · Post by **=Romagnolo=** » 2007-05-05 22:20

OMG, just a bullet is enough to kill a person, why do they develop stronger weapons ? But it's look nice

Teek · Post by **Teek** » 2007-05-05 22:24

=Romagnolo= wrote:OMG, just a bullet is enough to kill a person, why do they develop stronger weapons ? But it's look nice

because they need eather, more bullets, bullets with more power, or bullets exactly where you want them, or shoot bullets from were ever you want to be....

jerkzilla · Post by **jerkzilla** » 2007-05-05 22:25

OMG, just a bullet is enough to kill a person, why do they develop stronger weapons ? But it's look nice

To blow a wider variety of shit up.

Cherni · Post by **Cherni** » 2007-05-05 22:40

'[R-PUB wrote:Garabaldi']I hate Future Weapons, because people want everything they see on it implemented into PR .

It's used by Special Forces unit, not conventional forces, so it's unlikely to be implemented any time soon.

future=2142=sucks

Raniak · Post by **Raniak** » 2007-05-05 22:42

'[R-PUB wrote:Garabaldi']I hate Future Weapons, because people want everything they see on it implemented into PR .

It's used by Special Forces unit, not conventional forces, so it's unlikely to be implemented any time soon.

GIEV IT 2 TEH SEPC OPS !!111!1!!!!1!!111!111 OMG WTF

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2007-05-05 23:26

Heh, that gun was in the movie "Shooter"

Mcadwell · Post by **Mcadwell** » 2007-05-05 23:36

that was a pretty bad a$$ gun! It uses a computer to put the sights right on the target and actually takes into consideration the rotation of the earth for long distances!

PlayPR! · Post by **PlayPR!** » 2007-05-05 23:48

Golden7B wrote:[IMG]
This is my kind of night: I watch Future Weapons on Discovery channel

You do realize that by uttering those two words you have henceforth destroyed you're credibility towards suggesting weapons?

eddie · Post by **eddie** » 2007-05-06 00:17

Or anything at all.

Golden7B · Post by **Golden7B** » 2007-05-06 16:03

hmmm, maybe i should of just said, "hey i find this gun nice" instead of "can we get this..." and/or i saw it on "wiki" instead of future weapons.....

What do you know, i prefer watching this before playing than "whos the next pusscat doll..."

Basically, i just found it nice it could be that precise from such a long range...thats it....dont get stuck on two words....

next time, ill choose all words, title, sources with EXTREME caution

BlackwaterEddie · Post by **BlackwaterEddie** » 2007-05-06 18:33

Golden, until you can get a picture of either the Brits, the Yanks, the Chinese or the Arabs using it, dont bother posting it.

That gun is what i like to refer to as "overkill". Its only been made to test technological advances in weapons and is about as practical as driving a tank to work.