PR v0.6 Final Class & Kit Loadouts

Long Bow · Post by **Long Bow** » 2007-05-08 13:45

Longbow* wrote:Very very strange solutions with Militia . They definitely need more AKM's and AK-74 \ AK-74S if they are Chechen based . PPsh & Scorpion are just a joke , on my opinion . Even if they have them , they are very rare and uncommon . They'd better suit as pickup kit firearms , not regular ones ...

First off nice name

Second EggMan stated that the Militia is not Chechen. They are a more evolved insurgency of no exact nation. The PPsh was made in huge #'s and I believe is still used by a european country currently (just read it in another thread, surprised me). Im not sure about the scorpion though, it could just be a place holder until they get something more suitable?

robbo · Post by **robbo** » 2007-05-08 14:04

Leader-AK74 Optics 6+1,
an AK74 with optics

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-05-08 14:05

Spoiler: It's the Ak74u from vanilla.

robbo · Post by **robbo** » 2007-05-08 14:13

Gutted: F*ck sake

PlayPR! · Post by **PlayPR!** » 2007-05-08 14:33

G3A3 Optics 8+1 in .6!

*Proceeds to run around house like a schoolgirl*

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-05-08 15:11

bosco wrote:G3 with optics and still the ordinary M16 for USMC?
YEEEEEEAAAAAH!
Big YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAH!

Fixed.

The US get all thier fancy high tech toys and you're complaining about an itty bitty thing like an optical scope?

Bob_Marley - Member of the society for making the MEC imba. (or atleast ba)

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-05-08 15:26

Bob_Marley wrote: The US get all thier fancy high tech toys

And what would that be in 0.6?

VipersGhost · Post by **VipersGhost** » 2007-05-08 16:09

I'm sure they at least fixed the recoil with both the G3 and M16, that will even things out initially...ESPECIALLY if they added in an addition "You got hit with a bullet in the chest" effect. No more super soldiers absorbing bullets without a flintch...but who knows, maybe its still present.

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-05-08 16:38

bosco wrote:And what would that be in 0.6?

Very few. But in the past releases they've very much recived more attention than the MEC or PLA. Its about time they got some attention of thier own.

Jedimushroom · Post by **Jedimushroom** » 2007-05-08 16:42

bosco wrote:Spoiler: It's the Ak74u from vanilla.

What?

OH! You mean 'ROBOGUN' T3h gun ov teh futzors!!111

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-05-08 16:48

Bob_Marley wrote:Very few..

So they could at least get their little ACOGs to keep the game balanced...

Flanker15 · Post by **Flanker15** » 2007-05-08 16:56

Remember this is the weapon list for the open beta, the final .6 release may have the M16A4 optics.

SiN|ScarFace · Post by **SiN|ScarFace** » 2007-05-08 17:14

Good stuff but seriously how do you give MEC a G3 with optics and you still neglect USMC? Is that actually an M16A4, but no optics?

Cheesygoodness · Post by **Cheesygoodness** » 2007-05-08 17:16

Flanker15 wrote:Looks like all the engineers lost their slug shot except the insurgent one. I hope it returns. Why is the UK and USMC UGL marked as needs changing?

Perhaps the less lethal ammo for 'killing civilians?' I hope so! That would be amazing.

Top_Cat_AxJnAt · Post by **Top_Cat_AxJnAt** » 2007-05-08 17:16

and who may i ask are you when it comes to insider knowelge?

Not beings rude, just need to clear up fact from rumour or even fiction.

Cheesygoodness · Post by **Cheesygoodness** » 2007-05-08 17:19

Top _Cat the great wrote:and who may i ask are you when it comes to insider knowelge?

Not beings rude, just need to clear up fact from rumour or even fiction.

Uh if you mean me? O.o Just a suggestion perhaps maybe?

paco · Post by **paco** » 2007-05-08 17:21

Maybe the USMC could get the T-39 Bogatyr or L-5 Riesig to compensate for the G3-optics?

Seriously, looks like it's going to be really fun. All of the factions need weaknesses, the weak parts make the game play more dynamic.

SiN|ScarFace · Post by **SiN|ScarFace** » 2007-05-08 17:24

paco wrote:Maybe the USMC could get the T-39 Bogatyr or L-5 Riesig to compensate for the G3-optics?

Seriously, looks like it's going to be really fun. All of the factions need weaknesses, the weak parts make the game play more dynamic.

Weakness sure, but REALITY means USMC should have optics.

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-05-08 17:43

SiN|ScarFace wrote:Weakness sure, but REALITY means USMC should have optics.

+1

DirtyHarry88 · Post by **DirtyHarry88** » 2007-05-08 17:45

US have it hard enough against the G3, never mind a bloody G3 with optics. M4 all the way.