"Stealing" other team's Limited Kits
-
Outlawz7
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59
-
Dunehunter
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 12110
- Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42
-
[:NET:]Boondock Saint
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 2007-03-06 22:52
Don't think it is a good idea. As far as realism goes, it is not uncommon for someone, whether it be friend or foe, to pick up a fallen soldiers weapon and use it. If nothing else pick it up so it can't be used against you. It does suck that it counts against your teams kit selections, but one might say you should be more careful with your teams limited kits. If my buddy with the SAW or M14 goes down, it would be a good idea that I pick it up so the enemy cannot use it.
-
Outlawz7
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 17261
- Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59
-
Gyberg
- Posts: 709
- Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36
wtf.... if you are giving your kits away to the enemies you and your team should be punished, it's fine the way it is now!
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
-
zeidmaan
- Posts: 228
- Joined: 2007-02-11 18:05
Yeah I hate that as well.
Ejod starts, 2 MEC guys take heavy AT grab a truck and go shoot rockets at gas station. This happens very often. They get few kills and than get killed and loose both HATs. Now the USMC team has 4 HATs and MECs armor is fooked.
Also it sucks when one team has 7-8 snipers. I don't have fun than

Ejod starts, 2 MEC guys take heavy AT grab a truck and go shoot rockets at gas station. This happens very often. They get few kills and than get killed and loose both HATs. Now the USMC team has 4 HATs and MECs armor is fooked.
Also it sucks when one team has 7-8 snipers. I don't have fun than
proud member of *=LP=* 
-
Army Musician
- Posts: 1040
- Joined: 2006-03-10 23:10
-
Expendable Grunt
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54
-
Gyberg
- Posts: 709
- Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36
NO! If you lose the weapon you and your team should be punished! Tough Luck! Remember its Project Reality, some weapons are limited in real life aswell there is not an endless supply of H-AT weapons just laying around, if you lost your sniper rifle or H-AT to an enemy you better go and get it back!
Edit: Typo
Edit: Typo
Last edited by Gyberg on 2007-05-12 18:11, edited 1 time in total.
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
-
MadTommy
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34
QFTGyberg wrote:NO! If you lose the weapon you and your team should be punished! Tough Luck! Remember its Project Reality, some weapons are limited in real life aswell there are not an endless supply of H-AT weapons just laying around, if you lost your sniper rifle or H-AT to an enemy you better go and get it back!
-
Gyberg
- Posts: 709
- Joined: 2006-08-04 23:36
I see your point and I thought of it myself before posting my last post.Jonny wrote:But there is an unlimited supply anyway!!
If you go and die with a 'limited' weapon in the middle of the battle field you just get another - they magically return to be issued again once they dissapear.
If you insist on using the reality excuse then all kits should remain on the field indefinately and once a weapon has been issued it cannot be re-isssued and will just sit on the ground so you have to go and hunt it down if you want it again.
What say you now, Gyberg?
The way I see it the most important thing is that you should be forced to fight for your weapons, ofcourse there are some issues with kits "respawning" and that is not realistic, but nor is players respawning realistic. I personaly think it's more realistic for a weapon to be unavailable regardless of which team who uses it.
Personally I would love to see limited kits to remain on the battlefield and not respawn so that one actually would have to be careful with the kits. I guess what it comes down to is me wanting a team to not be unaffected by an enemy who is smart and choses the targets, such as H-AT, sniper rifles, MG's etc and then turns the weapons against you and your own team.
Anthony Lloyd, himself a former soldier in the British army and a Northern Ireland and Gulf War veteran:
"The men inside (the APC) might have been UN but they were playing by a completely different set of rules. They were Swedes; in terms of individual intelligence, integrity and single-mindedness I was to find them among the most impressive soldiers I had ever encountered. In Vares their moment had come."
-
Deadmonkiefart
- Posts: 632
- Joined: 2007-02-06 04:33
Really bad idea. IRL ppl do it all the time.Fearosius wrote:It has come to my attention that after a person dies with his beloved M14/M249, it usually gets "stolen" away from him from the other team. To stop this, just code the game engine so limited kits can not be picked up by the opposite team. This would prevent one team having all 4 DMRs or 6 LMGs, therefore balancing out gameplay.
- Post your thoughts




