The BMP
-
Flanker15
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 2007-02-23 09:37
The BMP
Was just wondering if there was any plans to drop the BMP from SF into PR somewhere since it was quite nice. Maybe the militia or insurgents could have it? I was going to say the same thing about the HindD from SF but it's probably already been suggested.
Also in the Suggested Ideas sticky, what is a "spider tank"? It better not be what I think it is.
Also in the Suggested Ideas sticky, what is a "spider tank"? It better not be what I think it is.
Help Project Reality in Australia, join the bigD community!
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
-
Longbow*
- Posts: 496
- Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00
Flanker15 wrote:Was just wondering if there was any plans to drop the BMP from SF into PR somewhere since it was quite nice. Maybe the militia or insurgents could have it?
BMP-3 - are you kidding ? Give modern ( one of the best btw ) IFV for militia & insurgents ? The only IFV that insrg\militia may recieve is BMP-1 .
Hind from SF is an agliest model I ever seen .Flanker15 wrote:I was going to say the same thing about the HindD from SF but it's probably already been suggested.
Also in the Suggested Ideas sticky, what is a "spider tank"? It better not be what I think it is.
-
Flanker15
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 2007-02-23 09:37
Was it a BMP-3? I can't remember but yeah that's too modern for insurgents/militia but it's still a nice model just waiting to be used.
Help Project Reality in Australia, join the bigD community!
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
-
Ironcomatose
- Posts: 3471
- Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07
-
Flanker15
- Posts: 266
- Joined: 2007-02-23 09:37
It's not in the already suggested sticky and BMP won't register in a search so I don't know, maybe?
Help Project Reality in Australia, join the bigD community!
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
http://www.bigdgaming.net/
-
Longbow*
- Posts: 496
- Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/showth ... ight=BMP-3Flanker15 wrote:It's not in the already suggested sticky and BMP won't register in a search so I don't know, maybe?
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/showth ... ight=BMP-3
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/showth ... ight=BMP-3
https://www.realitymod.com/forum/showth ... ight=BMP-3
-
El_Vikingo
- Posts: 4877
- Joined: 2006-11-27 01:50
-
BetterDeadThanRed
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30
-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
-
BetterDeadThanRed
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30
-
Bob_Marley
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 7745
- Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39
I'd love to see the MEC get a properly implimented BMP3 (with smoothbore [with ATGMs], 30mm autocannon and PKT) if only I didnt know that there would be cries of "imba!" from a vocal minority within the PR community.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
-
GeZe
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: 2006-02-09 22:09
Me too, I would also like to have the BMP-2 or BMP-3 replace the BTR-90 for the MEC, as the BTR-90 is very unrealistic. Only limited amounts have been produced for the Russian (possibly Ukriane as well) Army only, unlike the BMP-2 which there are numerous amounts in the Middle East (there are BMP-3s as well, but they are mostly in the UAE).Bob_Marley wrote:I'd love to see the MEC get a properly implimented BMP3 (with smoothbore [with ATGMs], 30mm autocannon and PKT) if only I didnt know that there would be cries of "imba!" from a vocal minority within the PR community.
-
daranz
- Posts: 1622
- Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53
Well, the lack of AT missiles is easier to explain on the BTR-90...
It would be nice to see some actual IFVs in PR, as that part of modern warfare is somewhat underrepresented at the moment (Warrior is practically the only one). However, it seems to me like even if BMP were to be implemented, it would be stripped of its missiles, and would serve in a role similar to that of current APCs. I guess I just want some Bradleys, riding out with M1A1s in recon role, scouting ahead and engaging targets with their TOWs.
It would be nice to see some actual IFVs in PR, as that part of modern warfare is somewhat underrepresented at the moment (Warrior is practically the only one). However, it seems to me like even if BMP were to be implemented, it would be stripped of its missiles, and would serve in a role similar to that of current APCs. I guess I just want some Bradleys, riding out with M1A1s in recon role, scouting ahead and engaging targets with their TOWs.

-
BetterDeadThanRed
- Posts: 1728
- Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30
I agree with you daranz, there is no distinction between APC and IFV, although I believe that there is room enough in this mod for both. The US Army definatly needs bradley fighting vehicals when it is introduced and the BMP-2/3 to go along with it as its counter balance.
I'll have to check globalsecurity.org to see if there are any tracked chinese IFVs.
I'll have to check globalsecurity.org to see if there are any tracked chinese IFVs.
-
GeZe
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: 2006-02-09 22:09
I think that the BMP-2 without ATGM would be the best option, as the BMP-3s cannon would be to unbalancing and there is the fact there are many more BMP-2s in the Middle East then there are BMP-3s.
Also, you asked for a Chinese IFV: http://www.sinodefence.com/army/armour/zlc2000.asp
Also, you asked for a Chinese IFV: http://www.sinodefence.com/army/armour/zlc2000.asp
-
blackeagle1992
- Posts: 119
- Joined: 2007-05-18 17:25






