MG's for APC's

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
jerkzilla
Posts: 1615
Joined: 2007-03-07 12:04

Post by jerkzilla »

Super dj, that would very likely take the remodeling of the whole vehicle.
This signature is here due to lack of imagination.
Lampshade111
Posts: 401
Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37

Post by Lampshade111 »

I believe the Bradley still has firing ports but they are typically covered up by the additional side armor. They could cut out a section in that additional armor so the side firing ports could be used but they are pretty useless so nobody bothers.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

youm0nt wrote:Ehh? One of the vBF2 expansions already has the P90 as an unlock, which we can take and use for PR... There's no need to make a new whole model or changing the sights...
P90 is the Anti-Tank kit unlock in vBF2...
Image
ZanderArch
Posts: 216
Joined: 2007-03-07 21:40

Post by ZanderArch »

youm0nt wrote:Ehh? One of the vBF2 expansions already has the P90 as an unlock, which we can take and use for PR... There's no need to make a new whole model or changing the sights...
Outlawz wrote:P90 is the Anti-Tank kit unlock in vBF2...
It's both. Standard Issue for Euro Force's AT and Unlock Level 2 for Vanilla BF2.

The sights need to be changed since the ones in Vanilla use the "Red Dot" that the M4A1 and SCAR-L use, which isn't what the real P90 uses.
And what's the second part of the title of this mod?
[url=realitymod.com]Image[/url]
[url=realitymod.com]Image[/url]
"If you want realism, go outside."
-Krenzo
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

We could use the F2000 sights, those are good (no 1337 red dots)
Image
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

Bob_Marley wrote:For a viechle that no longer has firing ports. The M231 is also an army exclusive, so using it as an excuse for firing out of the side of the LAV-25 makes no sense. Also, the firing ports for that weapon face rearward.

Though I suppose it could be a contender for the US Army crewman weapon when they are introduced.
The M231, as said earlier, would not be a choice for a US crewman weapon. It is just designed to be used from firing ports, and it is aimed with tracers. We have stated before that the LAV-25 in use by the US Marines does not even have firing ports in real life. This is an issue that has yet to be fixed, and I don't know why.
superdj wrote:Don't LAVs have a mounted mg as well?
Yes, they often have an M240 mounted on the commander's hatch. It would require a remodel, though.
Lampshade111 wrote:I believe the Bradley still has firing ports but they are typically covered up by the additional side armor. They could cut out a section in that additional armor so the side firing ports could be used but they are pretty useless so nobody bothers.
The M2 Bradley IFVs firing ports (both of them) are now only on the rear ramp. The M3 Bradley CFV has no firing ports at all.
Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Post by Teek »

The M3 CFV (cavalry fighting vehicle) has 2 dismount scouts, and m240 for them to share, I think there is a AT rockets too.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”