What would you like to see be done with the Special Forces kit?

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Locked

What should be done with SF kit

Get rid of it
58
17%
Make it a limited kit
69
20%
Make it a paratrooper kit
91
26%
Make it a CQB rifleman kit
72
21%
Leave it alone
55
16%
 
Total votes: 345

ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

I want more explosives on the "spec-op" kit but any change that is made to the class that will lower the leetsmacktard usage would be great.
Whenever I make an easy kill it's always a guy carrying the spec-ops weapon.
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

To be honest, I don't know what to choose for the poll... The results are very close... We'll just have to see what the devs do with the kit for .6....
Longbow*
Posts: 496
Joined: 2007-03-10 03:00

Post by Longbow* »

Seriosly, make it Recon class , maybe with some abilities like UAV ( not exactly in the way it is represented in vanilla , just something new .. ) or other , calling airstrikes etc etc . Remove scope from M4A1 & L119A1
BlackwaterEddie
Posts: 752
Joined: 2007-02-01 13:26

Post by BlackwaterEddie »

Its not a scope, its a red dot sight, and its catered towards use in a CQB situation, i dont see why it should be removed, you should be glad it isnt an ACOG.
Biggaayal
Posts: 140
Joined: 2006-11-14 15:35

Post by Biggaayal »

Found the best thread to post this I believe.

Plz bring back parachutes!. I really miss parachuting in with a whole squad. It is something that was so well done in the bf2 engine.

I would really love to see the chute again (especially with the great transport choppers we have now) either in the spec ops kit, a special airborne class, or as a request-able kit. Any info on this ever happening?

ps airborne is in the lead in the poll!
ghost_dog
Posts: 80
Joined: 2007-05-14 13:42

Post by ghost_dog »

OK Special Forces are just that Elite. So they have abit of everything cause they need it all.
KEEP>>>>>>>>>>>>
1.> Binoculars
2.> C4
3.> Smoke Grenades
4.> SOFLAM ( just make the look look cooler hate the look )

And maybe the whole look like a small backpark, maybe a pirate head band look. I really like the way the marines look with all that webbing in IRAQ.... that be cool. Like a Pirate head band under the helmets hang out the back of the helmet over the back of the neck if you know what I mean.
Also the helmets with that PARA look like the sniper bits that come out of the helmet.
What do you think guys?????????????????????
( I WISH I WAS A FAST DESIGNER ) hehehehehehehe
Taffy
Posts: 179
Joined: 2005-09-12 16:13

Post by Taffy »

Smitty4212 wrote:I'm not too concerned right now, jack of all trades master of none type deal sounds ideal.
But surely that's the exact opposite of a special forces soldier?

Make it a limited kit, with knife, carbine, nades, SOFLAM, SLAM, C4, no body armour, field dressing. SLAM and C4 could be used for different roles: SLAM for destroying targets, C4 for destroying/seriously damaging armoured convoys and the such. That's my 2 pence.
Myself wrote:It'd be more popular than PR, cuz itd appeal to the noob-spraying, team-killing, bunny-hopping, jet-crashing, team-swapping retards that belong in vanilla BF2.

Neutraliser of 1 spam bot.
AnRK
Posts: 2136
Joined: 2007-03-27 14:17

Post by AnRK »

If it's been kept in the longterm I'd like to see it as a recon kit. What kind of equipment they would use or whether it's realistic is beyond me though.
MichSt-Spartan
Posts: 180
Joined: 2007-05-13 16:02

Post by MichSt-Spartan »

We need a paratrooper class badly..
eggman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 11721
Joined: 2005-12-27 04:52

Post by eggman »

MichSt-Spartan wrote:We need a paratrooper class badly..
All base kits in the v0.6 build have an _para variant. These can be used situationally for insertions.

We have no intent to add back in a class that jumps from helicopters ad hoc.
[COLOR=#007700][COLOR=DarkGreen]C[COLOR=Olive]heers!
egg[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Image
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

We have no intent to add back in a class that jumps from helicopters ad hoc.
I am very glad to hear that.
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
daranz
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53

Post by daranz »

There's no paratrooper planes in PR, so giving people parachutes in pointless.

As to specops, give them the dual uzis, so that they're even easier to kill when they run around like headless chickens.

Seriously, though, thinking of the class as "spec ops" isn't going to work to well. Real life special forces teams don't consist of people with the exact same equipment, and because of that, any squad in PR containing riflemen, medics and engineers can be considered specops, and can perform special operations. What the specop would really be good at is a spotter for the sniper or a recon guy. Perhaps his kit should be more similar to the officer's kit, with a SOFLAM, and signal grenades for marking enemy positions. The specop shouldn't be any better at any sort of combat than the rifleman, as this attracts tons of smacktards to the class, and forces SLs to yell at them to grab something else.

Another interesting thing to do with the specop would be giving him some sort of a bonus to intelligence gathering in the insurgency mode. After all, special forces in real life often handle capturing of high profile individuals and recovery of intel from behind enemy lines.
Image
eggman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 11721
Joined: 2005-12-27 04:52

Post by eggman »

nice idea wrt intel bonus for spec ops.
[COLOR=#007700][COLOR=DarkGreen]C[COLOR=Olive]heers!
egg[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Image
MichSt-Spartan
Posts: 180
Joined: 2007-05-13 16:02

Post by MichSt-Spartan »

daranz wrote:There's no paratrooper planes in PR, so giving people parachutes in pointless.

As to specops, give them the dual uzis, so that they're even easier to kill when they run around like headless chickens.

Seriously, though, thinking of the class as "spec ops" isn't going to work to well. Real life special forces teams don't consist of people with the exact same equipment, and because of that, any squad in PR containing riflemen, medics and engineers can be considered specops, and can perform special operations. What the specop would really be good at is a spotter for the sniper or a recon guy. Perhaps his kit should be more similar to the officer's kit, with a SOFLAM, and signal grenades for marking enemy positions. The specop shouldn't be any better at any sort of combat than the rifleman, as this attracts tons of smacktards to the class, and forces SLs to yell at them to grab something else.

Another interesting thing to do with the specop would be giving him some sort of a bonus to intelligence gathering in the insurgency mode. After all, special forces in real life often handle capturing of high profile individuals and recovery of intel from behind enemy lines.
HALOs can be done out of BHs and Merlins.
daranz
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53

Post by daranz »

MichSt-Spartan wrote:HALOs can be done out of BHs and Merlins.
Neither Blackhawks nor Merlins fly at 30000ft. Besides, they're damn choppers, and not intended for HALO deployments of troops.

Unless you mean in game, but then, that's kinda my point.
Image
M.J.Patterson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 648
Joined: 2006-09-20 16:04

Post by M.J.Patterson »

I would have to vote for make it a CQB rifleman and SF should be limited...
Image
Wasteland
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2006-11-07 04:44

Post by Wasteland »

One thing I definitely wasn't hoping to see with spec ops was a boost to their RoF.
Originally Posted by: ArmedDrunk&Angry
we don't live in your fantastical world where you are the super hero sent to release us all from the bondage of ignorance
Originally Posted by: [R-MOD]dunehunter
don't mess with wasteland, a scary guy will drag you into an alleyway and rape you with a baseballbat
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Post by ReadMenace »

Cerberus wrote:In a realism mod it's a bad idea. The whole concept of a "CQB Rifleman" just isn't realistic. It's not like in a marine rifle squad you're going to find a few guys carrying M4's for the purpose of clearing rooms. You're making the M16A4 sound like a bolt action Mosin-Nagant that weighs twenty pounds.

Perhaps we should replace the spec ops class with a radioman or fire support guy, either being capable of calling in airstrikes.

No, but the Marines do have M16A4's with EOTech reflex sights. Make the M16 a little more functional in CQB.
eggman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 11721
Joined: 2005-12-27 04:52

Post by eggman »

RoF on SF carbines is unchanged, just the sound is now matched to the M4 RoF whereas previously it was off.

v0.6 SF is the only class without body armour. Not a very attractive class if used as a direct combatant class. But a great class to work with a sniper team or as a saboteur.

HALO from a helicopter ???? High Altitude Low Opening .. from a real life perspective, we're talking about jumping from several miles high with oxygen masks here..... not jumping out of a Blackhawk and popping the chute 10m above ground. Please don't confuse vBF2 with reality.

We already have _para variants, just nobody has [yet] made a really good map that has a plausible para insertion scenario. We tried it with Airport, but it didn't work out too well, tho I still think Para Insertion is a viable aspect of modern combat that we should try and get into PR. But as already stated, we don't have any interest in enabling HALO from Blackhawks within the game... that would be one of those vBF2 artifacts we're progressively getting rid of.
[COLOR=#007700][COLOR=DarkGreen]C[COLOR=Olive]heers!
egg[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Image
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”