M-4 full auto

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
::Major_Baker::
Posts: 406
Joined: 2006-11-22 01:06

M-4 full auto

Post by ::Major_Baker:: »

Look, I know there ahve been posts about this in the past, but it is amazing how many people still use the M4 when playing as USMC.

Full auto spray and pray.

I can't find the change log, but what has been changed for this in .6?
I certainly hope it's not the same.

thoughts?
BlackwaterEddie
Posts: 752
Joined: 2007-02-01 13:26

Post by BlackwaterEddie »

The ROF seems to have been increased
Teek
Posts: 3162
Joined: 2006-12-23 02:45

Post by Teek »

BlackwaterEddie wrote:The ROF seems to have been increased
The SOUND ROF is increaced.
Specops has no Body armour, no nades, no SOFLAM, and Slams are useless.
Image
SiN|ScarFace
Posts: 5818
Joined: 2005-09-08 19:59

Post by SiN|ScarFace »

M-4 is weak sauce in .5 and .6, no worries.
Image
danthemanbuddy
Posts: 842
Joined: 2006-11-12 19:07

Post by danthemanbuddy »

Only worry about the spec ops in CQB, but with the way the v.6 beta is playing, you won't have to worry about anything, riflemen and snipers are the scary ones now.
eddie
Posts: 5495
Joined: 2005-05-09 20:42

Post by eddie »

Look at it my way: If they spray and pray, I win.
Image
OiSkout
Posts: 1294
Joined: 2006-05-14 02:39

Post by OiSkout »

Well, the gun is very useful. Especially in jungle maps.

I think the M4 is still necessary in game. Whenever I feel like ya know, assaulting stuff, moving around quickly, etc., I use the M4. Maybe it's just the feeling, but it's necessary.
Maverick--113
Posts: 125
Joined: 2007-02-09 02:02

Post by Maverick--113 »

I like it, spray and pray is useless though. The lack of body armor and frags is a real drawback though. I prefer it to the riflemen kit because the damn zoom on that m16 makes it impossible to do anything in cqb.
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch, liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
Falkun
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1207
Joined: 2007-04-02 03:52

Post by Falkun »

The m4 might be a bit overpowered in CQB, but then it is a CQB weapon. Totally sucks at range though...very amusing when a spec ops whore is trying to snipe me with a m4 from long-range...
Blackhawk 5
Posts: 1607
Joined: 2006-08-25 02:23

Post by Blackhawk 5 »

The M4 in .4 dominated
Viper5
Posts: 3240
Joined: 2005-11-18 14:18

Post by Viper5 »

Well a full auto Carbine should rule in CQB... its what its made for. And once the US Army comes everyone gets M4s, albeit no full auto.
Falkun
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1207
Joined: 2007-04-02 03:52

Post by Falkun »

'[R-PUB wrote:Viper5']Well a full auto Carbine should rule in CQB... its what its made for. And once the US Army comes everyone gets M4s, albeit no full auto.
The same spec ops m4, just with no full-auto? Wouldn't that make the US Army faction the worst in ranged-fighting in-game?
ZanderArch
Posts: 216
Joined: 2007-03-07 21:40

Post by ZanderArch »

Falkun wrote:The same spec ops m4, just with no full-auto? Wouldn't that make the US Army faction the worst in ranged-fighting in-game?
Currently, the Spec Ops has the M4A1, the Army will get the M4. It will hopefully be unrealistically actualized to balance them out, or else, well, lets just hope the American version of the AH-64 Apache is good.
[url=realitymod.com]Image[/url]
[url=realitymod.com]Image[/url]
"If you want realism, go outside."
-Krenzo
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Post by Jaymz »

ZanderArch wrote:the Army will get the M4. It will hopefully be unrealistically actualized to balance them out.
What the hell does that mean? It will be zeroed to 300m and will be just as effective as an M16 at that range.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
swiftdraw
Posts: 173
Joined: 2007-03-14 14:32

Post by swiftdraw »

'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz']What the hell does that mean? It will be zeroed to 300m and will be just as effective as an M16 at that range.
Errrm, I'm no expert at firearms but I remember people bitching that the M4's accuracy dropped dramatically around 150 yards (about 137m.) Is that right?
CAS_117
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2007-03-26 18:01

Post by CAS_117 »

The M-4 is the best rifle in the USMC as of now. I'll take the red dot over the iron sight any day, even with the 0.6 zoom, the rabbit ears are really hit and miss. Usually the latter...
Filamu
Posts: 318
Joined: 2006-12-15 14:20

Post by Filamu »

It is not the accuracy that drop at 150m it is the damage, it just dont kill as good. And since there is little recoil the accuracy is ok at long distances too
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

Since the M-4 and the M-16 fire the same round, wouldn't the M-4 have HIGHER muzzle climb, since there is less rifle to absorb recoil?
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
Hitperson
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6733
Joined: 2005-11-08 08:09

Post by Hitperson »

well seeing as it has a shorter barrel i would have thought so also the round would travel slower and the gun would be louder as well as having a brighter muzzle flash at night.
Image
Harrod200:"Fire.exe has committed an illegal operation and has been shut down"
Raniak : "Warning: May crash if fired upon."
M4sherman: "like peter pan but with tanks"
[R-MOD]Eddiereyes909 (on sim tower) "It truly was the game of my childhood and has led to me getting my degree in industrial engineering."
<SS&D>Bys0n
Posts: 70
Joined: 2007-06-04 18:38

Post by <SS&D>Bys0n »

I dont see the problem with having a fully automatic weapon, I always use the Spec Ops kit when in close combat, doesnt make me a noob does it, its common sense, there are plenty of other fully automatic weapons in the game so i dont understand what the problem is tbh?
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”