are twin-rotor helos possible in bf2?

gazzthompson · Post by **gazzthompson** » 2007-06-16 12:59

f1 and f2 ?

Jedimushroom · Post by **Jedimushroom** » 2007-06-16 14:01

Post by **Rhino** » 2007-06-16 14:03

more like weapon 1, 2, 3 etc

daranz · Post by **daranz** » 2007-06-16 15:09

If you look closely at his gun when viewing it in external view, it doesn't really move to smoothly... It moves as if it had 4 directional keys assigned to it, which is even more puzzling. Perhaps he found a way to retain cyclic control while using the collective and pedals (in other words, movement keys for non-joystick users) to control the gun.

-=ToD=-KNIFE · Post by **-=ToD=-KNIFE** » 2007-06-16 19:14

Choppers Nice i want it but i also want that Tu-160

wojing_rotorhead · Post by **wojing_rotorhead** » 2007-06-16 20:47

I would really like to see a ch-47 in PR because they are used quite regularly in operations!! only problems is they are so damn big!! and more then likely they would create even more LAG then there is already!!

charliegrs · Post by **charliegrs** » 2007-06-17 02:32

yes a ch 47 chinook is quite a big chopper, however i dont think it would be too big for a map like kashan. but the thing is, and correct me if im wrong people, but the marine corps doesnt use chinooks. they use the little brother of the chinook, the ch 46 sea knight. well until its replaced by the osprey. the sea knight is quite a bit smaller, if i had to take a guess id say its probly about the size of the british merlin in PR. so it would definitly fit, but it would have to be flown carefully because it would be an enticing target all full of marines.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-06-17 03:16

devs already said that the current force in PR is the US force , not only marines .

and BTW i really dont care , the PLA dont use the z8 as a primary trasnport chooper , they use mi17s , but i dont complain about that (actualy , nobody complain about that :mrgreen

Maxfragg · Post by **Maxfragg** » 2007-06-17 11:25

guys could you stop this US forces, ARMY, USMC wyning ?
current we have US forces with priority and a split in ARMY and USMC will come in a future version, when the M4A1 and the M16A4 are in game

Lampshade111 · Post by **Lampshade111** » 2007-06-17 18:55

Well the EA M4A1 is already in the game but that model is not the best (still better than their awful M16A2 however.)

Yes, I agree that we should worry about Army and Marine differences once we get all of their right gear in the game.

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-06-17 19:20

Maxfragg wrote:guys could you stop this US forces, ARMY, USMC wyning ?
current we have US forces with priority and a split in ARMY and USMC will come in a future version, when the M4A1 and the M16A4 are in game

Just M4, actually. Regular US grunts arnt allowed unrestricted full auto on thier rifles.

Lampshade111 · Post by **Lampshade111** » 2007-06-17 19:35

Now I now Wikipedia says that but I don't think that is true. While I know many units have the standard M4 I think all production is focusing on the M4A1 now and I know some guys in regular units who have M4A1s and don't get yelled at.

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-06-17 19:39

Well the M4 is standard issue. And its confirmed that its what the US army will be carrying in PR.

Lampshade111 · Post by **Lampshade111** » 2007-06-17 19:51

Standard issue for some units. Certain units have M16A4s and many National Guard units have older M16A2s. Hell I read about one squad where three men were using M16A1s for some reason. In a combat zone nobody really cares if your using a modernized M14 or a variant of the M16 or M4 that is not standard to your unit. Your regular rifleman is not supposed to have a pistol either but just like in World War II many men end up getting their own somehow.

Anyway I disagree with making the M4 standard for the US Army but I can only yell at the devs, not mind control them and change it.

Post by **Fullforce** » 2007-06-17 19:52

Its not the rotors in BF2 that define lift and such. Its the coding.