The rifleman kit...

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Corrient
Posts: 13
Joined: 2007-03-15 18:19

The rifleman kit...

Post by Corrient »

Is it just me, or now that every rifleman kit has a scope (or in the case of the Marines, a high zoom) does it seem like firefights are less intense?

I mean, you can SNIPE with these things. It's like having a semi/fully automatic sniper rifle which almost completely negates the usefulness of kits like the support kit on anything but urban maps. The second the support kit opens up, people see tracers, and headshot the poor sod before he knows what's going on.
$kelet0r
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04

Post by $kelet0r »

it's a limitation of the engine
the problem is that the weapons can and are that accurate but the timing and patience needed to achieve that cannot be represented in game without making the weapons horribly inaccurate because weapon sway and breathing cannot be implemented at all.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Theres still enough recoil to go with.
Image
Cheeseman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1291
Joined: 2006-11-12 06:23

Post by Cheeseman »

That’s the point. PR is trying to back away from Rambo style game play. People will think twice before running in the open and risk of getting shot by someone 100 meters away. People are encouraged to find appropriate cover and work together to scan the area for enemy threats before engaging towards their objectives.
wazza_ni
Posts: 105
Joined: 2007-03-29 21:29

Post by wazza_ni »

Corrient wrote:
I mean, you can SNIPE with these things. It's like having a semi/fully automatic sniper rifle which almost completely negates the usefulness of kits like the support kit on anything but urban maps. The second the support kit opens up, people see tracers, and headshot the poor sod before he knows what's going on.
I think thats going a bit over the top...

What the devs are going for is more long range combat which is why theyve increased the view distance. Not that ive been in too many combat situations (actually none - im basing my point on alot of war footage ive seen) but alot of it is taking well placed shots at enemy that are several hundred metres away. And from the few games I got to play on the last Beta (namely Kashan Desert) i was well chuffed with the results.

Yea, if your lying in an exposed position and you start spraying an enemy position with the SAW your gonne be vulnerable to fire. But like cheeseman said, its about finding the right cover first before you open up on your opponent.
You can turn your back on a person, but never turn your back on a drug, especially when its waving a razor sharp hunting knife in your eye.
Hunter S. Thompson
Corrient
Posts: 13
Joined: 2007-03-15 18:19

Post by Corrient »

Even behind cover (logs, wedged between rocks, etc) somebody can still zoom in, duck behind a hill/cover a sec, pop up to see where you are, duck, adjust where they are aiming accordingly, and then let go of duck and pop you right in the noggin.

When I mean firefight, I don't mean spray and pray idiocy either, but the way the current rifleman kit works (automatic marksman kit...) minimizes such things as cover fire and well... machine guns in general since their accuracy is so piss poor over any sort of range.

I much preferred the .5 version of the rifleman kit. Still very useful, but without being scoped, it didn't have the amazing advantage over other kits in combat situations that it does now.
Xmaster
Posts: 242
Joined: 2007-05-18 12:44

Post by Xmaster »

Corrient wrote:Is it just me, or now that every rifleman kit has a scope (or in the case of the Marines, a high zoom) does it seem like firefights are less intense?

I mean, you can SNIPE with these things. It's like having a semi/fully automatic sniper rifle which almost completely negates the usefulness of kits like the support kit on anything but urban maps. The second the support kit opens up, people see tracers, and headshot the poor sod before he knows what's going on.
It makes you think twice before giving away your position.
Image
TacicalGamer Armed Assault Admin
Ingame Name: |TG-1st|Xmaster
Image Image
VipersGhost
Posts: 1171
Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34

Post by VipersGhost »

I thought these same things until I got some good time in on Seven Gates with a decent squad. The support gun owned and functioned very well. The engagement distances and number of scoped weapons is fairly accurate. We got into plenty of firefights and the use of smoke is now a REQUIREMENT instead of a suggestion. I loved the game machanics of the rifleman kit and thought things were well balanced. Yeah you can't stand or sit out in the open any more which is nice. Everyone has to have some cover or move well...position matters now not who can run and gun the best. Firefights are real now...when you here a bullet hit near you...get your head down or the next will put you down and by all means you better stick with your squad...there is no more of this darting all over the place until you find some guys and then dodge out with the fast-unrealistic movements. Now you have to man up and cover your buddies and make it work.
{GD}Ghost
Posts: 210
Joined: 2005-09-22 06:08

Post by {GD}Ghost »

Are you telling me that none of the basic rifleman kits are iron sites only?!

I am a hardcore believer in iron sites and have learned to use them well even at longer distances. Yes, it takes a bit more skill than relying on a scope. If this is true, is this not a step away from realism? From what I know, a normal rifleman squad is not issued scopes unless one or two of them are designated marksmen.
Image

Image
Ecko
Posts: 925
Joined: 2006-11-28 22:49

Post by Ecko »

I find the longer range better tbh.

I've had some 5 min fire fights without either parties dieing.
Image
AKA Ecko1987
Beep-Beep-Beep.
Masaq
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 10043
Joined: 2006-09-23 16:29

Post by Masaq »

The British army issues a 4x scope as standard with the SA80, I believe.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

{GD}Ghost wrote:Are you telling me that none of the basic rifleman kits are iron sites only?!

I am a hardcore believer in iron sites and have learned to use them well even at longer distances. Yes, it takes a bit more skill than relying on a scope. If this is true, is this not a step away from realism? From what I know, a normal rifleman squad is not issued scopes unless one or two of them are designated marksmen.
Use the Medic. Has no optics, but still useful - a lot ;)
Image
VipersGhost
Posts: 1171
Joined: 2007-03-27 18:34

Post by VipersGhost »

Hey Ghost, yeah I thought it was kind of strange than most soliders are now going to have pretty decent scopes. I didn't think this was realistic but from what I've been told the Dev's got it right...they said that most rifleman, which make up the core of your squad, have access to scopes. You really should just get on and play it with the improvements and changes...not everyone has a scope in a squad and its not like you are extremly extra effective with one too. Once you play it you will see.
Outlawz7
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 17261
Joined: 2007-02-17 14:59

Post by Outlawz7 »

Yeah, and everyone, that comes from vBF2, wants the sniper kits. You got the rifleman with better optics than the vBF2 scopes, ffs :lol: :lol: :p
Image
Lampshade111
Posts: 401
Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37

Post by Lampshade111 »

I find long range firefights rather boring so I use cover and flank the enemy to get close whenever possible. Most firefights take place at rather short ranges in real life anyway.
Rick_the_new_guy
Posts: 291
Joined: 2006-12-01 17:01

awsome quote

Post by Rick_the_new_guy »

VipersGhost wrote: The engagement distances and number of scoped weapons is fairly accurate. We got into plenty of firefights and the use of smoke is now a REQUIREMENT instead of a suggestion. I loved the game machanics of the rifleman kit and thought things were well balanced. Yeah you can't stand or sit out in the open any more which is nice. Everyone has to have some cover or move well...position matters now not who can run and gun the best. Firefights are real now...when you here a bullet hit near you...get your head down or the next will put you down and by all means you better stick with your squad...there is no more of this darting all over the place until you find some guys and then dodge out with the fast-unrealistic movements. Now you have to man up and cover your buddies and make it work.
@ the Public Realtions community for PR.

Check out that quote, feel free to use parts of it to promote .6. This is the kind of player base we need for the mod. :p
(PO3) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .609) Squad Member
(CPO) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .609) Squad Leader
(LCDR) Marcinko_R. (BF2 PR .609) Commander


Squad Member pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...ad-leader.html
Squad Leader pledge to their team:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...r-platoon.html
Commander pledge to their SL:http://www.tacticalgamer.com/battlef...d-leaders.htm
Alex6714
Posts: 3900
Joined: 2007-06-15 22:47

Post by Alex6714 »

The scope is nice, but try using it in reasonably close quarters on automatic, its harder then, or at least for me it is. You need some one to assault those bunkers!
Dunehunter
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 12110
Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42

Post by Dunehunter »

At really close ranges, just fire without zooming in. It usually works for me.
AOD_Morph
Posts: 248
Joined: 2007-03-03 04:28

Post by AOD_Morph »

Lampshade111 wrote:I find long range firefights rather boring so I use cover and flank the enemy to get close whenever possible. Most firefights take place at rather short ranges in real life anyway.
Average distance for a firefight IRL is about 200 meters.
In urban combat its about 60 meters.
Forgot where i got these numbers, but try to take my word it was a good source :p
Ingame: =TCC= Morph265
{GD}Ghost
Posts: 210
Joined: 2005-09-22 06:08

Post by {GD}Ghost »

I have found both in vBF2 and PR that it is always better to engage at range. When you do, it is truely the person with superior marksmanship skills that win those firefights.

While I don't agree that people should have to be lured into longer range fire fights by handing out scopes to most, I guess if it works, it works.

I can't wait to try it.
Image

Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”