BMP 2 and Bradley?

vikke-viking · Post by **vikke-viking** » 2007-07-06 17:49

Yes I am making another topic today...
Its about APC's. Now that we have the warrior wich is a belt APC, shouldent we then add the Bradley to the US and maybe the BMP2 to MEC. As for china..... I really dont know....

Just a idea....

hall0 · Post by **hall0** » 2007-07-06 17:58

Yes i aslo waiting for the bradley. Especially because we have now the Warrier already in.

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-07-06 18:34

The USMC does not use the bradley so you wont be seeing it anytime soon. But afaik the US Army is being added some time in the future and they will have the bradley as well as some other new toys.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-07-06 18:47

why a bmp2 if we alredy have the bmp3 in the pr0.6 files ?

youm0nt · Post by **youm0nt** » 2007-07-06 18:58

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:why a bmp2 if we alredy have the bmp3 in the pr0.6 files ?

ya srly. To vikke-viking, load up the Proving Grounds map and try out the BMP-3. Though, I doubt we'll actually be seeing this APC any time soon.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-07-06 19:00

yea, ubersuperpwnage vehicles will never be in PR .

Longbow* · Post by Longbow* » 2007-07-06 19:31

P90 and BMP-3 for teh MEC !

Viper5 · Post by **Viper5** » 2007-07-06 20:00

Bradley is a possibility once the US Army is introduced

vikke-viking · Post by **vikke-viking** » 2007-07-06 20:06

youm0nt wrote:ya srly. To vikke-viking, load up the Proving Grounds map and try out the BMP-3. Though, I doubt we'll actually be seeing this APC any time soon.

So thats BMP 3.... Aha... Another vehicle idea is for the USMC is the
"Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle" (EFV)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFV

Swe_Olsson · Post by **Swe_Olsson** » 2007-07-06 20:19

BMP 3 has been sudjested many times before, The EFV isnt really needed as we already have amphibious APC's for all factions but Militia & Insurgents

Post by **Dunehunter** » 2007-07-06 20:21

The Warrior isn't amphibious, is it? I've had it blow up in the water before, but that was in a previous beta.

Fracsid · Post by **Fracsid** » 2007-07-06 20:22

vikke-viking wrote:"Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle" (EFV)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EFV

Didn't that program fail miserably not too long ago? And PR takes place around 2010 or so supposedly, so it'd still be in development.

Swe_Olsson · Post by **Swe_Olsson** » 2007-07-06 20:24

oh **** sorry, but the warrior is not an APC, its a Infantry Fighting Vehicle IFV

vikke-viking · Post by **vikke-viking** » 2007-07-06 20:34

Fracsid wrote:Didn't that program fail miserably not too long ago? And PR takes place around 2010 or so supposedly, so it'd still be in development.

I think they are still testing it... But not 100% sure...

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-07-07 00:30

Longbow* wrote:P90 and BMP-3 for teh MEC !

Damn right man!

The Warrior isn't amphibious, is it? I've had it blow up in the water before, but that was in a previous beta

No, it isn't.

I think they are still testing it... But not 100% sure...

In testing, but at the current time its still fairly horrifically broken.

Teek · Post by **Teek** » 2007-07-07 00:48

I think the US Army should have Strykers and Maybe M3 CFV (with TOW and no spawning).

Post by **Bob_Marley** » 2007-07-07 00:56

Well you'd better start working on them, hadn't you?

Otherwise I suspect you'll just have to wait and see.

If the US army get the Bradley with TOWs (and it will have TOWs, you can't have a Bradley without TOWs [unless its an M6]) the MEC should get the BMP-3 (complete with 100mm gun, missiles for said gun, 30mm autocannon and PKT on the turret. Along with the 2 bow PKTs

Lampshade111 · Post by **Lampshade111** » 2007-07-07 01:01

I still don't get the point of having a 100mm gun, 30mm cannon, and a 7.62mm coaxial machine gun in the same vehicle but it would be a nice addition.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-07-07 01:06

maybe for land superiority ?

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2007-07-07 01:25

These have been suggested before. Please do a search next time.