LAW 80 and PF89 scopes

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Post Reply
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

LAW 80 and PF89 scopes

Post by youm0nt »

I have a question about these two light anti tank weapon scopes. Are the devs making better ones for the official release of 0.6? To me, they're kind of hard to find the middle of the scope, especially the LAW 80. The PF89 is easier but still hard to aim and target an enemy vehicle from far away. If these are placeholders or these are the actual real life reticule for these weapons, I wouldn't mind seeing the SRAW/Eryx scopes for these weapons. What these two scopes need is something to have a small circular reticule or something to make them easier to use.
Image
LAW 80

Image
PF89

Thoughts, opinions? Discuss.
Top
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

they are not ment to be used for long range....
Image
Top
robbo
Posts: 1159
Joined: 2006-10-25 15:14

Post by robbo »

Yeh but they still suck at short range. At least make it have a smaller circle.
Top
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

'[R-DEV wrote:Rhino']they are not ment to be used for long range....
they have unrealistic scoped sights....
Top
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:they have unrealistic scoped sights....
you find the realistic refrenaces then we may think about it.
Image
Top
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

Image


more : http://realitymod.com/forum/showthread.php?t=19229
Top
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Post by =Romagnolo= »

OWNED (sorry, I think it was one !)
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro." (yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
Top
eggman
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 11721
Joined: 2005-12-27 04:52

Post by eggman »

Yeah they are really bad. We'll take a look at them for v0.7, but too late for v0.6.
[COLOR=#007700][COLOR=DarkGreen]C[COLOR=Olive]heers!
egg[/COLOR][/COLOR][/COLOR]

Image
Top
Rhino
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 47909
Joined: 2005-12-13 20:00

Post by Rhino »

=Romagnolo= wrote:OWNED (sorry, I think it was one !)
hardly, i asked him to look.
Image
Top
RikiRude
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3819
Joined: 2006-02-12 08:57

Post by RikiRude »

even with better scopes, i still wont be able to hit **** with them because im still not used to the way they arch =( !
Proud n00b tub3r of 5 spam bots!

ImageImage

'[R-CON wrote:2Slick4U']That's like being the smartest kid with down syndrome.Image
Top
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

They don't arc, do they? I've never noticed it, and I'm a pretty good shot with those, able to take out light stuff from the side of a LB (and with heavy AT as well for APC's)
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
Top
knewman
Posts: 38
Joined: 2007-04-08 05:44

Post by knewman »

Yea both HAT and LAT arch, heavy just takes a little longer to do it.
Top
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

Yup, the light anti tank weapons' arc is very noticable.
Last edited by youm0nt on 2007-07-08 23:55, edited 1 time in total.
Top
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

thatas why the sigh has those litle dots .
Top
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”