AT Rocket use.

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Post Reply
tekkyy
Posts: 111
Joined: 2007-06-26 14:53

Post by tekkyy »

I have nothing against L-AT on infantry.
No good for stealth but great for decoy.

Actually I feel H-AT kit limit is a problem.
You get less kits when server is empty, but you don't get less tanks when the server is empty.
Don't know if thats realistic.

You could stand off attack a tank with H-AT in 0.5. But now with the sniping from tanks in 0.6 it could be a problem again.
Darkpowder
Posts: 1527
Joined: 2006-08-30 22:00

Post by Darkpowder »

Simple Solution:

Some or all of these will make people use H-AT against Tanks (why people don't amazes me).

You get no points at all for killing infantry with Heavy-AT. (of course people might still do so "to get the job done" i.e. kill sniper with heavy AT who is in a house pinning down a whole infantry section.
You get no points at all for the infantry you kill in a APC.
You get more points for killing a tank than an APC.
You get points for destroying commander deployed resources with heavy AT.

Alas, people are still motivated by points rather than the success of the team.
bigbossmatt
Posts: 290
Joined: 2006-05-21 12:05

Post by bigbossmatt »

I have found the only workable mindset about ethics for the battlefield is this:

"If it can be done in the game, its fair"
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”