101st Clan = Epic amounts of Fail

Post by **PARAMEDIC.CA** » 2007-07-20 01:24

lol, much to do about nothing. There's lot's of servers to choose from and much more to loose by ranting about such a trivial occurance.

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2007-07-20 01:27

WNxKenwayy wrote:WnxJaymz (dev) and me, WNxKenwayy, join the 101st's clan server on seven gates. We both join chinese and play around in the woods a bit.

Bit to much information for me

Diesel0ne · Post by **Diesel0ne** » 2007-07-20 01:29

WNxKenwayy wrote:Jokingly, the first time, I said something to that effect Spearhead. How banning a dev would result in not getting the next server patch. Their response? .6 sucks and they don't care if they don't get the next server patch. yuuuuuuuuuup.

Those ungrateful ********. I have to say if they keep this up and don't get there license revoked, you guys are a lot more level-headed than i am.

ps. I'm not trying to tell the devs what to do. I just cannot think of another way to put it and it makes me angry that a group of people can be so self-centered and unthankful for something that was given to them free of charge to enjoy.

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-07-20 02:02

Desertfox wrote:Bit to much information for me

Now at first i was just browsing around in this topic but i just had to log in to say this.....LMAO GOOD ONE DESERTFOX!

PS yeah man if i were the DEVs i would show those guys some of the same kind of "by the book" "admining" if you know what i mean.And if you dont know what i mean i mean not letting them get any server updates and taking awaya their license.

Skullening.Chris · Post by **Skullening.Chris** » 2007-07-20 02:14

Hilariously pathetic story, thanks for sharing. Never heard of anyone getting banned for defending against spawn rapers before. F'ing insane.
I too shall be avoiding that server, unless maybe I'm on later when I'm drunk and feel the need to get permabanned...

Post by **Jaymz** » 2007-07-20 02:46

Desertfox wrote:Bit to much information for me

slick, very slick.

Tehv3r1z0nguy · Post by **Tehv3r1z0nguy** » 2007-07-20 02:53

I'm really sorry to hear about all the bans, it's kindof idiotic to bite the hand that feeds you though. Please, Devs, just revoke their license. ***-goblins like them don't deserve a server, let alone the right to be an admin on a server.

Post by **Jaymz** » 2007-07-20 04:15

Normally I wouldn't give a shit about being kicked by accident. All they had to do was say "sorry, we kicked the wrong people". Instead they just told us to shut up and take it up on their forums.

ArmedDrunk&Angry · Post by **ArmedDrunk&Angry** » 2007-07-20 04:27

'[R-CON wrote:DVB-PARAMEDIC.CA']lol, much to do about nothing. There's lot's of servers to choose from and much more to loose by ranting about such a trivial occurance.

Well just call me Don Quixote and consider them a windmill !

Strange, I played with popabear a few months ago and got invited to the clan but never followed up and at the time he seemed like a level headed guy.

I'm am very dubious about clans that have super strict adherence to the " book " ( UCMJ I think it is ? ) but it is their clan so ....

I was going to bed but now I think I might play just one game .....ya know to test out my lance and trusty steed .....

BTW : Punk music is ..... well it's just ... um nvm

Post by **Ghostrider** » 2007-07-20 04:58

ArmedDrunk&Angry wrote:Strange, I played with popabear a few months ago and got invited to the clan but never followed up and at the time he seemed like a level headed guy.

Well, you cant say that someone is 'good' (or level-headed in this case) if that someone never had the chance to do something 'evil' or wrong. There they got the chance and failed. They're not as level-headed as you thought they were :/

Something that caught my eye though was Kenway's link where they say that they wont be putting up a PRM v0.6 server. Made a search for their server's IP in the site and there were no matches for it, or the name.. will look into it.

-Ghost

ArmedDrunk&Angry · Post by **ArmedDrunk&Angry** » 2007-07-20 05:16

OK so i didn't put that the right way and probably shouldn't have said anything.
But the idea of not playing PR because the British are drawing down troops in real life ............that is just nuts.
I support the US effort over there but this is a game, albeit a very good game and making decisions like that sounds like some symptoms of meglomania to me.

causticbeat · Post by **causticbeat** » 2007-07-20 05:44

ArmedDrunk&Angry wrote:OK so i didn't put that the right way and probably shouldn't have said anything.
But the idea of not playing PR because the British are drawing down troops in real life ............that is just nuts.
I support the US effort over there but this is a game, albeit a very good game and making decisions like that sounds like some symptoms of meglomania to me.

What I dont understand is that theyre all up in a shit fit about the British withdrawing, but they forgot to mention the fact that all along theyve been fighting a fucking made up army in PR. Regardless of if there are more US or GB levels

Post by **eggman** » 2007-07-20 05:49

I dont see this going anywhere constructive from here.