V0.6 Patch/Hotfix

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
agentscar
Posts: 1266
Joined: 2007-06-25 04:26

V0.6 Patch/Hotfix

Post by agentscar »

Due to some small bugs in v0.6,like the apache bug,which is a new key asset for v0.6,will there be a patch/hotfix for v0.6?If there is a planned patch,can you gies at PR give an estimated release date for patch/hotfix,and what it'll fix?
Image
Image
Image
IronTaxi
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4925
Joined: 2006-05-31 12:56

Post by IronTaxi »

likely, no estimate yet...people taking a bit of a break im sure...
StalkerZERO
Posts: 36
Joined: 2005-03-20 09:01

Post by StalkerZERO »

Somebody correct me please.......

Was the super zoom on the standard riflemen weapon's ironsight supposed to be like that? If not, then that should certainly be considered to be a fix for the next patch or hotfix...right?
youm0nt
Posts: 4642
Joined: 2007-03-16 15:13

Post by youm0nt »

StalkerZERO wrote:Somebody correct me please.......

Was the super zoom on the standard riflemen weapon's ironsight supposed to be like that? If not, then that should certainly be considered to be a fix for the next patch or hotfix...right?
Yes, it's supposed to be like that.
([COLOR="Yellow"]o,o)
|)__)[/COLOR]
-"-"-
O RLY?
Long Bow
Posts: 1100
Joined: 2007-03-21 14:41

Post by Long Bow »

StalkerZERO wrote:Somebody correct me please.......

Was the super zoom on the standard riflemen weapon's ironsight supposed to be like that? If not, then that should certainly be considered to be a fix for the next patch or hotfix...right?
It is a temporary addition to the game while the new model with the ACOG scope is being completed. It will remain until replaced.
=Romagnolo=
Posts: 4765
Joined: 2006-12-29 14:52

Post by =Romagnolo= »

StalkerZERO wrote:Somebody correct me please.......

Was the super zoom on the standard riflemen weapon's ironsight supposed to be like that? If not, then that should certainly be considered to be a fix for the next patch or hotfix...right?
As in reality, the soldiers are using more scopes on theyer rilfes. The G3 has, the typeXX (from PLA) has, the L8xxx (from British forces, I dont know the name) has. The ameircans have also, but the scope model could'nt be done in time for the 0.6. So the added a zoom to be a balanced gameplay.
[R-DEV]OkitaMakoto:"Cheers, you're the man, Okita"
[R-DEV]Rhino:"I in fact got kicked from a server for tking."
Hitperson:"well done, treasure it forever."
[R-DEV]Adriaan:"Damned classy Roma, if I may say so."
[R-DEV]Chuc:"Pro man, pro."
(yes, it was about me)
[R-MOD]BloodBane611:"Romagnolo, you definitely deserve a LOL award for that."
$kelet0r
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04

Post by $kelet0r »

*crosses fingers that devs will finally change M4a1 to an M4 semi-3 burst selection
Expendable Grunt
Posts: 4730
Joined: 2007-03-09 01:54

Post by Expendable Grunt »

$kelet0r wrote:*crosses fingers that devs will finally change M4a1 to an M4 semi-3 burst selection

That will be the weapon for the Army, when they add them in .8/.9 .
Image


Former [DM] captain.

The fact that people are poor or discriminated against doesn't necessarily endow them with any special qualities of justice, nobility, charity or compassion. - Saul Alinsky
$kelet0r
Posts: 1418
Joined: 2006-11-15 20:04

Post by $kelet0r »

you know very well what I mean
[DVB] TRIggS
Posts: 397
Joined: 2006-10-15 01:51

Post by [DVB] TRIggS »

Supposedly, the US Army will come in .7, but I havent seen a dev say anything on them for a long time. I thought there was a problem with incremental patches, unless the bugs are on the server side.
Image
StalkerZERO
Posts: 36
Joined: 2005-03-20 09:01

Post by StalkerZERO »

=Romagnolo= wrote:As in reality, the soldiers are using more scopes on theyer rilfes. The G3 has, the typeXX (from PLA) has, the L8xxx (from British forces, I dont know the name) has. The ameircans have also, but the scope model could'nt be done in time for the 0.6. So the added a zoom to be a balanced gameplay.
Ok, thats cool then. Its just that it seemed kinda odd being that the pr team is very competent. It had seemed out of place for them to make such an obvious mistake like that.
Was the no scope thing acknowledged in the public wiki or something?
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Post by Jaymz »

$kelet0r wrote:*crosses fingers that devs will finally change M4a1 to an M4 semi-3 burst selection
M4A1 is semi/auto only. The M4 is semi/burst. That's what the US army will be getting.
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
TristanYockell
Posts: 340
Joined: 2007-01-21 05:03

Post by TristanYockell »

I just want my damn T62 back and I'll be happy :-P .
A-10Warthog
Posts: 1911
Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28

Post by A-10Warthog »

$kelet0r wrote:*crosses fingers that devs will finally change M4a1 to an M4 semi-3 burst selection
;)
A-10, EX PR Tester, Moderator, Public Relations.

.

Image

from [R-DEV]CodeRedFox: "Fixing bugs creates more bugs"
ArmedDrunk&Angry
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2006-07-14 07:10

Post by ArmedDrunk&Angry »

and I have a bridge for sale.
great location
recently painted
And as the windshield melts
My tears evaporate
Leaving only charcoal to defend.
Finally I understand the feelings of the few.
Spaz
Posts: 3957
Joined: 2006-06-01 15:57

Post by Spaz »

'[R-DEV wrote:xW0LFx']we've also found a away to stick a grappling hook on helicopters.... yes fast roping!
:26_suicid
Image
Jaymz
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 9138
Joined: 2006-04-29 10:03

Post by Jaymz »

ArmedDrunk&Angry wrote:and I have a bridge for sale.
great location
recently painted
loool
"Clear the battlefield and let me see, All the profit from our victory." - Greg Lake
henno13
Posts: 71
Joined: 2007-03-04 09:17

Post by henno13 »

'[R-DEV wrote:xW0LFx']we've also found a away to stick a grappling hook on helicopters.... yes fast roping!
OMFG
FASTR0P1NG!!!!!!!!!
:D :D :D
YAY
Image
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”