Bob_Marley wrote:They're not. Regular units in the US military don't get full auto weapons. Only SF.
Alright, I guess what I'm getting at is to put a kit that represents the Army Rangers. Would they not be used for securing urban environments and buildings? Green Berets would be represented by the limited kit. I guess for the Marines it would be the Recon Battalion and Force Recon?
Why? The M16 has the highest ROF in the game for an assault rifle. Body armor and burst is perfectly acceptable for the vast majority of situations.
The reflex sight affords me a full field of view which allows me to see people coming in from side rooms while I'm covering the stairs. I also do not need to waste any time pulling iron sights up when I see an enemy. Again, the recoil is also easier to control.
1. Yes, it is rather. It would require a complete turn around in US doctrine reguarding fully automatic weapons and regular units.
Hmm, I dunno. I provide this quote from an article on the Force Recon website:
The M4A1 Carbine Close Quarter Battle Weapon (CQBW) is the standard weapon for those in the reconnaissance platoons. The current Marine Corps wisdom is that the M4A1 Carbine is to supplement, rather than replace the M16A2 (just as the MP5N sub-caliber machine gun did) in the Force Reconnaissance Companies. This may soon change as the Marine Corps is considering replacing all M16A2’s in the Marine Corps with the M4/M4A1 Carbine or the M16A4. The impetus for this move is the growing trend of MOUT (Military Operations in Urban Terrain) worldwide.
2. Learn. Adapt. Survive. Its a limitation, deal with it.
I will, by picking the M4A1 for CQBs.