With the US Army for PR 0.7

Post by **Katarn** » 2007-08-03 17:47

1. undecided as of yet, likely no
2. M4 + ACOG + m203
3. 4x ACOGS as of yet
4. Possibly
5. unplanned but possible
6. not planned and we don't really care

I hope that answers your questions.

Post by **bosco_** » 2007-08-03 17:48

1. Dunno, guess not.
2. M4/M203 with ACOG.
3. ACOGs
4. Dunno.
5. "
6. I dont think so, would require editing the soldier model which would be too much effort for little effect.

edit: Katarn! >:3

3===SPECTER===3 · Post by **3===SPECTER===3** » 2007-08-03 20:08

[R-DEV]Katarn wrote: .....2. M4 + ACOG + m203....

Im gonna like that gun

Expendable Grunt · Post by **Expendable Grunt** » 2007-08-03 21:07

Aw man I made a serious thread about the .7 US Army faction with some more interesting questions and most of what I got was spam :<

Viper5 · Post by **Viper5** » 2007-08-03 21:11

1. Prolly not
2. M4+M203+ACOG
3. Prolly the 4x ACOG
4. Possibly, or the Stryker would serve as the Wheeled APC (Like an AAV or Saxon) and the Bradley would serve as the IFV (LAV or Warrior)
5. Not a priority
6. ??

PlayPR! · Post by **PlayPR!** » 2007-08-03 21:48

[R-PUB]Viper5 wrote: 4. Possibly, or the Stryker would serve as the Wheeled APC (Like an AAV or Saxon) and the Bradley would serve as the IFV (LAV or Warrior)

This is a good idea, please PR team, let us have some Bradley IFV and Stryker goodness!

pasfreak · Post by **pasfreak** » 2007-08-03 22:08

booyah

Hey, I like british forces, but it seems a little off center when the entire game is based on one faction
same with BF2, usmc is on every map. it gets old.
I wanna see us army vs insurgents, pla vs. brits, pla vs. usmc
brits/usa vs mec, russia vs. CHECHEN forces, etc etc...

Eddiereyes909 · Post by **Eddiereyes909** » 2007-08-03 22:17

I would pay money to play a round of USMC VS Brits,

however i know it will never happen

ReaperMAC · Post by **ReaperMAC** » 2007-08-03 22:20

Eddiereyes909 wrote:I would pay money to play a round of USMC VS Brits,

however i know it will never happen

Oh gosh....

jayceon515 · Post by **jayceon515** » 2007-08-04 10:39

1 simple question
Is there going to be an insurgency map for US army?

Expendable Grunt · Post by **Expendable Grunt** » 2007-08-04 10:47

I had asked about maps earlier, but didn't get a streight answer.

My guess is yes, if you mean Insurgents vs US Army -- might even be AAS.

Longbow* · Post by Longbow* » 2007-08-04 12:55

afaik standart army scope is M68 aimpoint
So why are you guys planning to give US Army ACOG's ? It may be issued as a pick up\requestable kits ( i.e. - soldiers may by them for their own money , if the want - thats what I've heared various times ) , but not as standart ones .

And LAV-25 isn't an IFV . It is used by marines as an armored scout vehicle , something like that .

And I'd really like to see unlock sistem working to select between M4's ( zeroed at 100m - maybe 200?) and M16A2\A4 ( zeroed at 300-400m )

Post by **Deadfast** » 2007-08-04 13:05

Longbow* wrote:why are you guys planning to give US Army ACOG's ?

To balance out China's and MEC's scoped rifles I think

.

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2007-08-04 13:07

Longbow* wrote:afaik standart army scope is M68 aimpoint
So why are you guys planning to give US Army ACOG's ?

Longbow, the ACOG x4 is most definitely standard Army issue, it just depends on the soldiers preference, tasks and terrain.