Can I
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37
-
KingofCamelot
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: 2006-01-07 18:17
Our current policy is no public modded servers, period. If the server is passworded you can modify times, etc.Lampshade111 wrote:I have seen several passworded servers with different spawn times (not really mods) and one of the developers said they would be willing to allow a public server with different server settings if somebody mature asked. (might have been wrong, still trying to dig up the quote)
Ruthless Executioner of 280 SpamBots
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37
Again I can understand why the developers would want most servers running the standard mod but rules that would prevent a mature group from running a server with reduced spawn times simply sucks. Some people including myself (who are not noobs or anything like that) would enjoy those sort of servers
What about disabling the "bonus" spawn time for dying nonsense?
What about disabling the "bonus" spawn time for dying nonsense?
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37
-
KingofCamelot
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: 2006-01-07 18:17
Go any further off-topic and you'll earn yourself a ban. This thread is not about modded servers. Thats been discussed to death, and the Dev team's decision is not up for discussion.Lampshade111 wrote:Why can't you have them put MODDED in their server name or something. It just seems like the current solution is worse than the problem.
Ruthless Executioner of 280 SpamBots
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37
-
KingofCamelot
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: 2006-01-07 18:17
Why should I punish the OP just because you went off-topic?
People usually complain when we lock a ton of threads, its not a policy to close every thread that reaches a conclusion.
I threatened to ban you beacause the questions you keep asking don't belong in this thread, and as I said, have been discussed so much its no longer an issue. No one wants to hear the same discussion 1000x, and you've added nothing new.
People usually complain when we lock a ton of threads, its not a policy to close every thread that reaches a conclusion.
I threatened to ban you beacause the questions you keep asking don't belong in this thread, and as I said, have been discussed so much its no longer an issue. No one wants to hear the same discussion 1000x, and you've added nothing new.
Ruthless Executioner of 280 SpamBots
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37
Well if you guys are shutting out any opposition to this nonsense at the moment I won't continue. However I maintain my opinion and hope you change the system at some point for reasons I won't discuss further.
Last edited by Lampshade111 on 2007-08-13 02:59, edited 1 time in total.
-
KingofCamelot
- Retired PR Developer
- Posts: 2365
- Joined: 2006-01-07 18:17
Theres a difference between shutting out opposition and not wanting to hear about it in a totally unrelated thread.Lampshade111 wrote:Well if you guys are shutting out any opposition to this nonsense at the moment I won't continue. However I maintain my opinion and hope you change the system at some point for reasons I won't discuss further.
Ruthless Executioner of 280 SpamBots
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
Retired Lead Coder for Project Reality - 0.25 through 0.4
-
A-10Warthog
- Posts: 1911
- Joined: 2007-01-03 01:28
-
Lampshade111
- Posts: 401
- Joined: 2007-06-08 19:37



