Su-25 Frogfoot Vs. A-10 Warthog

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Post Reply
Brummy
Posts: 7479
Joined: 2007-06-03 18:54

Post by Brummy »

Petey wrote:ok another question...
whats the difference between the a-10 thunderbolt II, the a-10 tankbuster, and the a-10 warthog??
They're all the same :D
Liquid_Cow
Posts: 1241
Joined: 2007-02-02 22:01

Post by Liquid_Cow »

The official name for the A10 is Thunderbolt II, named after the P-47D Thunderbolt, one of the most successful CAS aircraft of WWII (it too was a flying tank).

Pilots quickly named the A-10 the Warhog because it just looks nasty and ugly.

It's primary role is anti-tank, making it a "tank buster."
Golden Camel Alliance
Fear the Moo!!!
<MFF>
Bob_Marley
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7745
Joined: 2006-05-22 21:39

Post by Bob_Marley »

Liquid_Cow wrote:The official name for the A10 is Thunderbolt II, named after the P-47D Thunderbolt, one of the most successful CAS aircraft of WWII (it too was a flying tank).

Pilots quickly named the A-10 the Warhog because it just looks nasty and ugly.

It's primary role is anti-tank, making it a "tank buster."
Rocket Firing Typhoon!

Or, with a less national pride clouded response, Il-2.
The key to modernising any weapon is covering them in glue and tossing them in a barrel of M1913 rails until they look "Modern" enough.
Image
Many thanks to [R-DEV]Adriaan for the sig!
Liquid_Cow
Posts: 1241
Joined: 2007-02-02 22:01

Post by Liquid_Cow »

You forgot the Stuka, all good planes.

I also should not have said CAS, as that was not very common in WWII, it was more of interdiction aircraft.
Golden Camel Alliance
Fear the Moo!!!
<MFF>
snafu
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-08-09 02:37

Post by snafu »

IMO the A-10 kicks @ss
Ironcomatose
Posts: 3471
Joined: 2007-02-21 06:07

Post by Ironcomatose »

snafu wrote:IMO the A-10 kicks @ss
IMO your opinion is invalid. :-P

[R-DEV]DuneHunter - No offense to any female gamers, but never, ever underestimate the amount of havoc a woman can unleash upon innocent unsuspecting electronics.
Dunehunter
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 12110
Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42

Post by Dunehunter »

IMO I suggest we tie you ontop of a T-90, park it somewhere in the dessert, then let some A-10s attack you. Ofcourse, you would by tied down face downwards,so they could really kick your a$$. ;)
snafu
Posts: 10
Joined: 2007-08-09 02:37

Post by snafu »

dunehunter wrote:IMO I suggest we tie you ontop of a T-90, park it somewhere in the dessert, then let some A-10s attack you. Ofcourse, you would by tied down face downwards,so they could really kick your a$$. ;)
LOL - I just love the cannons on that plane
Z-trooper
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4166
Joined: 2007-05-08 14:18

Post by Z-trooper »

A10 has GAU-8, SU-25 has better engines + airframe?
Image
"Without geometry, life is pointless"
Petey
Posts: 253
Joined: 2007-08-21 22:02

Post by Petey »

another another question...
in project reality, is the GAUS-8 on the a-10 the same as the ones on a real a-10???
cause i heard that one bullet from the GAUS-8 can take out a tank if its lucky....and i know for damn sure u cant do that in PR
Image
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

gau-8 cant penetrate the front of modern armors .
Liquid_Cow
Posts: 1241
Joined: 2007-02-02 22:01

Post by Liquid_Cow »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:gau-8 cant penetrate the front of modern armors .
While true, you're not shooting at frontal armor, you're hitting the roof which is much thinner.

As for # of hits, I've been told that IRL 3 rounds is considered a lethal hit every time.
Golden Camel Alliance
Fear the Moo!!!
<MFF>
CAS_117
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2007-03-26 18:01

Post by CAS_117 »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:gau-8 cant penetrate the front of modern armors .
Ummmm...
Petey
Posts: 253
Joined: 2007-08-21 22:02

Post by Petey »

Liquid_Cow wrote:While true, you're not shooting at frontal armor, you're hitting the roof which is much thinner.

As for # of hits, I've been told that IRL 3 rounds is considered a lethal hit every time.
so can 3 shots disable a tank in PR?
Image
Leo
Posts: 2082
Joined: 2006-11-29 00:40

Post by Leo »

No, but you gotta remember, in RL they're shooting from much farther away, and its harder to get three shots on top of the turret than in game.
Liquid_Cow
Posts: 1241
Joined: 2007-02-02 22:01

Post by Liquid_Cow »

I don't know exactly how many rounds to kill a PRM tank, but its not much. I'm very good with the A-10 and a single well aimed burst will smoke just about anything at any angle.

IRL the GAU-8 shoots 3900rpm, which is exactly 3000rpm faster than is possible with the game engine, so RL compairisons are not possible. To compensate it should be a 1 round kill everytime.

BTW, here's a great pic showing exactly how big the gun is
Image
Golden Camel Alliance
Fear the Moo!!!
<MFF>
G.Drew
Posts: 4417
Joined: 2006-04-30 23:02

Post by G.Drew »

they annihilate armour as they should do already, then again i havent been in a plane in PR since closed testing
Image
Image

[R-COM]BloodBane611: I do like the old school rape...However, it's a bit awkward to be a white boy blasting the old school in public....
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

Liquid_Cow wrote:I don't know exactly how many rounds to kill a PRM tank, but its not much. I'm very good with the A-10 and a single well aimed burst will smoke just about anything at any angle.

IRL the GAU-8 shoots 3900rpm, which is exactly 3000rpm faster than is possible with the game engine, so RL compairisons are not possible. To compensate it should be a 1 round kill everytime.

BTW, here's a great pic showing exactly how big the gun is
Image


ermm....no , max rof ingame is 1800
Leo
Posts: 2082
Joined: 2006-11-29 00:40

Post by Leo »

It's 900, I'm pretty sure.

1800 sounds a bit high for the BF2 engine, you never know though.
WNxLT7
Posts: 351
Joined: 2007-03-27 13:59

Post by WNxLT7 »

The max rof for the bf2 engine is infact 900 rpm.
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”