AGM-114 vs AGM-65/ Kh-25: Damage is weird

CAS_117 · Post by **CAS_117** » 2007-09-09 06:50

Ok I just got off of 64 Kashan and I realized to my dismay that the AGM-65's need two hit to kill a tank. Which would be ok if the AGM-114 took at least that many. I just think its weird for a missile with a 8.2 kg warhead to be more powerful than a missile who's warhead is almost two times the total mass of the AGM-114. I just think that the damage of the Hellfire should be switched with the Maverick and AS-10. I'm pretty sure that a reactive armored tank would take about 2 hellfires to completely destroy anyways.

PlatinumA1 · Post by **PlatinumA1** » 2007-09-09 07:33

erm just spray wit gau-8 and fire one agm-114 , and the tank is dead

CAS_117 · Post by **CAS_117** » 2007-09-09 07:43

Ok obviously I need to simplify this.

ZaZZo · Post by **ZaZZo** » 2007-09-09 08:10

lmao @ picture

Hardtman · Post by **Hardtman** » 2007-09-09 08:54

I agree that the effectivity compared to the weight is kinda strange. I guess this will be one of the things the dev's will look into when they overhaul the airplane system.

But as far as I know, a Hellfire can kill a even a tank with reactive armor, since one of the possible warheads for a hellfire is a tandem-shaped charged, specifically designed to counter reactive armor.

Oh,and the picture is great

.

Brummy · Post by **Brummy** » 2007-09-09 11:44

BOOOOM! That picture rocks lol.

BobAndy · Post by **BobAndy** » 2007-09-12 00:03

that is quite possibly the best picture ever.

El_Vikingo · Post by **El_Vikingo** » 2007-09-12 00:12

Is the spark the explosion, or is the circle the explosion circumference?

Post by **Falkun** » 2007-09-12 01:22

El_Vikingo wrote:Is the spark the explosion, or is the circle the explosion circumference?

No, the circle is the bomb

CAS_117 · Post by **CAS_117** » 2007-09-12 05:27

Falkun wrote:No, the circle is the bomb

Don't make me break out photoshop!