CH-53 for USMC

Suggestions from our community members for PR:BF2. Read the stickies before posting.
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

[R-DEV]Katarn wrote:Let me just summarize the original suggestion.

The likelihood of the US getting the CH-53 is about as likely as the PLA getting this:
Well, I should hope not, as it wouldn't be authentic. Giant-scrotum tanuki are found only in Japan, though they are rare as seen in Miyazaki's documentary Pom-Poko. They would only be authentic for the Japanese GSDF. :mrgreen:
IAJTHOMAS
Posts: 1149
Joined: 2006-12-20 14:14

Post by IAJTHOMAS »

'[R-DEV wrote:Jaymz;497228']Image

0.7
I hope it'll be a limited kit, like 2 a map. Can you imagine the imbalance this kind of weapon could cause?
pasfreak
Posts: 645
Joined: 2007-07-13 01:50

Post by pasfreak »

can someone please end this thre... OMFG WHAT THE LOLOLOLOL
'[R-DEV wrote:Katarn;497146']Let me just summarize the original suggestion.

The likelihood of the US getting the CH-53 is about as likely as the PLA getting this:

Image
*PAS*
"You can't expect to have the DEVS make everything idiot proof....(though that is an arguable point due to the generous number of said idiots that do play the game)."

"next time I catch you in the bushes outside my place, I'm skipping the 911 call and going straight to 1911."
-unknown youtuber
BlakeJr
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 3400
Joined: 2004-09-12 12:04

Post by BlakeJr »

For once I agree with pasfreak... This has gone far too far.

Thread closed.
Image
{ pretty sig removed construction on new one has not begun }
... yet ...
Locked

Return to “PR:BF2 Suggestions”