M1 Abrams

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
Post Reply
Thomas[13thMEU]
Posts: 2
Joined: 2007-10-02 01:54

M1 Abrams

Post by Thomas[13thMEU] »

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hk9BiypNxQM


hey im in the tank division MOS 1811

you guys think we can get multiple colors for the tanks, maybe infrared or nightvision ive seen in that video the color red seems cool, maybe u can make the tank driver position more realistic
ArmyTanker120
Posts: 26
Joined: 2007-06-15 14:03

???

Post by ArmyTanker120 »

tank division MOS 1811....what country are u in? what military if u don't mind me asking.....^_^
Image
[uBp]Irish
Posts: 1794
Joined: 2007-01-17 23:47

Post by [uBp]Irish »

13th MEU (PR Clan) uses actual ranks and MOS's as positions within the clan. (i.e. a helo pilot is xxxx mos, while a tanker is xxxx mos, and infantry is xxxx mos).

~Vanworth

back to the question though, no... dont think the Dev's have any plans for doing infared/temp/nightvision. Although i do believe i remember seeing them say something about trying to make the driver more interesting...
Image
ReadMenace
Posts: 2567
Joined: 2007-01-16 20:05

Post by ReadMenace »

'[uBp wrote:Irish;499507']

back to the question though, no... dont think the Dev's have any plans for doing infared/temp/nightvision. Although i do believe i remember seeing them say something about trying to make the driver more interesting...
Yeah I remember that too; I thought they meant adding the CROWS turret; the driver could man the .50cal, while the "Commander" position, would have a M240.

-REad
ryan d ale
Posts: 1632
Joined: 2007-02-02 15:04

Post by ryan d ale »

Are there any maps that require nightvision or infra red imaging?

Not to my knowledge.
Project Reality's Unofficial Self-Appointed Anti vehicle mufti
Over 8 years and still not banned ;)
Obligatory Epic Forum Quote (QFT + LOL)
saXoni: "According to ********'s title their server is for skilled people only, so this doesn't make any sense. Are you sure you were playing on ********?"
Image
Indy Media
bosco_
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 14620
Joined: 2006-12-17 19:04

Post by bosco_ »

ArmyTanker120 wrote:tank division MOS 1811....what country are u in? what military if u don't mind me asking.....^_^
Owned :D
Image
wrestler9191
Posts: 1
Joined: 2007-08-06 02:08

Post by wrestler9191 »

Hey buddy, if you had any sense on military, you would understand MOS (military Operational Speciality) those digits indicate your direct training and your ability in the profession in the military, The Marines use digits only, such as 0300 is Basic Infantry man, So on so forth, and 1800's is Tank and heavy armor~ 1811 is Crewmen. Now the US Army Uses Digits and letters to varify their MOS's. And Also It's the US Military, you should've seen that after the 13th MEU <Marine Expeditionary Unit> apart of the 3/1 or 3rd battalion 1st marines, which is under the SOC or Special Operations Capable. This is quite basic stuff, If you 'Actually' served in the military for any given time, since its been used and indoctrined in 1900's. Also to varify any of these comments such as "13th meu is a bunch of pussies" etc.. your going to have to stop whining here. Due to the fact that our server is only liscenced and used for our discression only, now heres the bigger stumper here, It's only used for our purpous's so that it will be open to the public but only run under the legal justification that the server provider and PR group discloses to us. So in all essential it is NOT a free country to use our server so stop sending threatening messages that I have recorded on a file that holds serval names and IP's that state messages that are illegal.

such as~
[14:29:57] stumbledwarf -> so then what they say on the forums is true then ....Thank you ..only had to wait 10 min to see that you are all they said
[14:30:04] stumbledwarf -> fuck you
Thats an example, so keep it up, I'll keep it in my little black book. Those is the only one that isn't too graphic or holds too much profanity.
USMC[KILLER]
Posts: 142
Joined: 2005-05-03 01:00

Post by USMC[KILLER] »

wrestler9191 wrote:Hey buddy, if you had any sense on military, you would understand MOS (military Operational Speciality) those digits indicate your direct training and your ability in the profession in the military, The Marines use digits only, such as 0300 is Basic Infantry man, So on so forth, and 1800's is Tank and heavy armor~ 1811 is Crewmen. Now the US Army Uses Digits and letters to varify their MOS's. And Also It's the US Military, you should've seen that after the 13th MEU <Marine Expeditionary Unit> apart of the 3/1 or 3rd battalion 1st marines, which is under the SOC or Special Operations Capable. This is quite basic stuff, If you 'Actually' served in the military for any given time, since its been used and indoctrined in 1900's. Also to varify any of these comments such as "13th meu is a bunch of pussies" etc.. your going to have to stop whining here. Due to the fact that our server is only liscenced and used for our discression only, now heres the bigger stumper here, It's only used for our purpous's so that it will be open to the public but only run under the legal justification that the server provider and PR group discloses to us. So in all essential it is NOT a free country to use our server so stop sending threatening messages that I have recorded on a file that holds serval names and IP's that state messages that are illegal.

such as~
[14:29:57] stumbledwarf -> so then what they say on the forums is true then ....Thank you ..only had to wait 10 min to see that you are all they said
[14:30:04] stumbledwarf -> fuck you
Thats an example, so keep it up, I'll keep it in my little black book. Those is the only one that isn't too graphic or holds too much profanity.
PWNED!
Image
100% Polish & Proud

Alpha SquadPvt. Polak Echo Company, 2nd Battalion 7th Marine Regiment
1st Marine Division
USMC
Ragni<RangersPL>
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2007-08-13 10:44

Post by Ragni<RangersPL> »

Driver in PR 0.6 is using tanks commander optics (it is called CITV as far as I remember). Why?
I prefered tank driver point of view in PR 0.5, it was more realistic.
ImageRANGERS LEAD THE WAY!!!
:29_slaps: Do not post stupid suggestions just because you had a bad round in PR :fryingpan
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

that sounds like snake doctor
BetterDeadThanRed
Posts: 1728
Joined: 2007-02-12 02:30

Post by BetterDeadThanRed »

Well, the lack of punctuation is conducive to snake doctor, but he didn't spell more than 50 words wrong in a 10 word post so I kind of doubt it was him.
ImageLeMazing.
daranz
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53

Post by daranz »

Ragni<RangersPL> wrote:Driver in PR 0.6 is using tanks commander optics (it is called CITV as far as I remember). Why?
I prefered tank driver point of view in PR 0.5, it was more realistic.
In .6 there is no driver. You're the commander, but you also drive the tank (a real life commander would instead tell his driver where to go). It might be unrealistic, but so is having a tank with only two crewmen, and no commander (therefore noone to utilize the commander optics and maintain situational awareness while the gunner operates the turret).
Image
Ragni<RangersPL>
Posts: 1319
Joined: 2007-08-13 10:44

Post by Ragni<RangersPL> »

daranz wrote:In .6 there is no driver. You're the commander, but you also drive the tank (a real life commander would instead tell his driver where to go).
Hmm... that sounds like reasonable explanation.
ImageRANGERS LEAD THE WAY!!!
:29_slaps: Do not post stupid suggestions just because you had a bad round in PR :fryingpan
CAS_117
Posts: 1600
Joined: 2007-03-26 18:01

Post by CAS_117 »

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:that sounds like snake doctor
Who?
77SiCaRiO77
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4982
Joined: 2006-05-17 17:44

Post by 77SiCaRiO77 »

the one who make the thread .

why do you thing that he was banned?
Clypp
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2006-07-17 18:36

Post by Clypp »

Three banned individuals in one thread. Impressive.

In other news no night maps have tanks *yet* so having red or green thermal visioning is not an issue.
daranz
Posts: 1622
Joined: 2007-04-16 10:53

Post by daranz »

Clypp wrote:Three banned individuals in one thread. Impressive.

In other news no night maps have tanks *yet* so having red or green thermal visioning is not an issue.
Thermal vision is also useful during the day, for greater contrast, etc.

But then, unless implemented properly (don't count on that, BF2 and all), it's not gonna be that much use in game.
Image
DOAW
Posts: 542
Joined: 2007-02-13 23:23

Post by DOAW »

Well, I was going to tell him why he isn't isn't the Marines, but since he's banned I'll have to settle with informing everyone else.

1. 1811 is the M60 Tank Crewman MOS. 1812 is the M1 Tank Crewman MOS.

2. There are no armored divisions in the Marines, only Armor Battalions.

3. While 3/1 is currently the Battalion Landing Team for 13 MEU, they're an infantry unit and have no organic armor assets. Any armor in 13 MEU would have to come from an armor battalion, probably 1st Tanks.

Nice try, do more research next time.
Such is life.
banditdog_1
Posts: 35
Joined: 2006-12-14 19:15

Post by banditdog_1 »

Night maps have absolutely nothing to do with thermal imaging gunnery systems.

We used our TOGS all the time in daylight - it is usually far easier to make out a glowing target due to engine heat at 1km that it is using just plain optics.
A sucking chest wound is natures way of telling you to adopt a better firing position
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”