[Vehicle] CH-47 Chinook

Post by **Outlawz7** » 2007-10-01 22:32

In BF:V you could carry more than just passengers inside a Chinook due the game engine

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2007-10-01 22:49

Which reminds me...? Why did we buy BF2 in the first place?

BF:V had the goodness of BF:1942 with new additions to the engine. The only improvement I see between the BF2 and BF:V engine would be the graphics improvement.

Ow yeah, nice looking Chinook; are you going to texture it yourself?

danthemanbuddy · Post by **danthemanbuddy** » 2007-10-02 01:07

[R-DEV]Rhino wrote:its not possible.

umm, I distinctly remember that King of Camelot came in and said with the right hard coding it could be possible. Search for "is this possible''

Ironcomatose · Post by **Ironcomatose** » 2007-10-02 03:10

NICE!! I hope to god that you or someone else finishes this up real nice so the Army can have something cool to play with instead of the Blackhawk. Not that the BH is not cool but enough it enough lol

Trigz07 · Post by **Trigz07** » 2007-10-02 04:40

Wanna know what I wanna see. 128 players +, actually 128 players is good enough. with chinooks flying all over.... yaa

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2007-10-02 10:48

What#s the prob with the Black Hawk? It's perfect for the BF2 engine ... you can transport 8 ppl and it'S possible to mount hydras and miniguns on it.

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-10-02 14:18

Black hawk sucks as it is now it think
Black hawk wont suck when it has ropes(A)
I still think its possible
Chinook would be a great addition for the US army in .7

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2007-10-02 17:53

I know ropes would be very nice but i don't think that it is possible.

There should be a DAP version of the Black Hawk especially on Kashan Desert.

Petey · Post by **Petey** » 2007-10-02 19:29

yeah speaking of guns, will the chinooks have any cool guns mounted on it? possibly a mini gun or what carebear calls a minimi

Post by **MAINERROR** » 2007-10-02 21:30

Why should it? It is a transport helo not a comabt helo.

LtSoucy · Post by **LtSoucy** » 2007-10-02 21:34

looks great keep up the great work.

ice_killer · Post by **ice_killer** » 2007-10-03 16:44

MAINERROR wrote:Why should it? It is a transport helo not a comabt helo.

well the Chinook can be mountet whit 2 .30 cal MG witch are operatet by the Loadmasters

KarateDoug · Post by **KarateDoug** » 2007-10-05 16:53

Wow, hey if you could pull this one off that will be amazing. Im agine the loss if the pilot wrecks.
I mean hey you could drive tanks and jeeps into that thing.

KP · Post by KP » 2007-10-05 17:13

KarateDoug wrote:Wow, hey if you could pull this one off that will be amazing. Im agine the loss if the pilot wrecks.
I mean hey you could drive tanks and jeeps into that thing.

No, we couldn't. Vehicles inside vehicles in BF2 = kaploshions

Clypp · Post by **Clypp** » 2007-10-05 19:57

KP wrote:No, we couldn't. Vehicles inside vehicles in BF2 = kaploshions

But you can kludge it that within X meters of a Chinook you can request a Humvee with the T menu just like the commander requests the command truck.

Not pretty, but it would work.

Dan UK · Post by **Dan UK** » 2007-10-05 19:59

looking rather good gd work so far

ice_killer · Post by **ice_killer** » 2007-10-06 07:08

Clypp wrote:But you can kludge it that within X meters of a Chinook you can request a Humvee with the T menu just like the commander requests the command truck.

Not pretty, but it would work.

mmmmaybay doing it like the UAV shut work ? instead op seeing a UAV a chinook whit a load under its belly

ice_killer · Post by **ice_killer** » 2007-10-06 12:12