Westland Lynx

Post by **Hitperson** » 2006-01-02 18:17

sure ok then...

(cough)

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 18:19

No ones even mentioned the gazelle yet. It should definately be put in.

Post by **Evilhomer** » 2006-01-02 18:21

1)
it is impossible really to have jeeps or buggies drive into the back of helicopters like in J :O . they move around until they kill you, just like in BF 1942.

2)
Westland sea king.
Falklands war.
Nuff said.

3)
I don't think 0.3 will be out for a bit, we have got quite a bit of changing going on I believe!

jezzzy · Post by **jezzzy** » 2006-01-02 18:22

hmm that would be cool, they are probily the most useless helicopter ever though. you can kinda fly around and die or shoot some people with a GPMG maybe. I think they're only used as spotters and recon helicopters. i don't see how it could have a benificial role in BF2

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 18:26

mmm maybe heres a link make your own minds up,
http://www.army.mod.uk/equipment/ac/ab_gzh.htm

jezzzy · Post by **jezzzy** » 2006-01-02 18:28

that doesn't say anthing about anti tank, only directing such operations. I guess its closest resmbalance is the littlebird. it can carry 2/3 people.

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 18:50

Yeah sorry i got it wrong about the antitank, i thought it could be. Still you could have a sniper in the passengers seat. deliver him to roof tops, then pick him up again

jezzzy · Post by **jezzzy** » 2006-01-02 19:09

yeah itll be a cool get around chopper.

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 19:18

yeah, but as long as the chinook and lynx are in i wont be to upset if its left out

jezzzy · Post by **jezzzy** » 2006-01-02 19:23

yeah for sure..im looking forward to the merlin, those things are awsome.

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 19:30

actually, do we need the sea king if we have the merlin?

Eden · Post by **Eden** » 2006-01-02 19:33

'[R-DEV wrote:Evilhomer']1)
it is impossible really to have jeeps or buggies drive into the back of helicopters like in J :O . they move around until they kill you, just like in BF 1942.

They must have solved that problem in DF :X and it was amaing you could drive your buggy in there and they would be stationary someone would fly the chinook to the enemy are you would come flying out guns blazing from your buggy.

Post by **Hitperson** » 2006-01-02 19:48

Tom#13 wrote:actually, do we need the sea king if we have the merlin?

I think yes we do
it would be great if you could land em on the water and they would float is this possible??

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 19:50

Well if there is anyway it could be put in it should be. It is realistic and alot of people would like to see it put in

Post by **Hitperson** » 2006-01-02 19:51

dont use an RIB just land your chopper on the beach/in the shallows

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 19:53

Erm can they actually float or is it just something youd like to see?

Post by **Hitperson** » 2006-01-02 19:58

Tom#13 wrote:Erm can they actually float or is it just something youd like to see?

yes hence the boat hull and flotation bags on th sea king and the floatation bags on the merlin also this-->

the ch53 can too.

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 20:21

WOW, in that case, I totally agree with u

jezzzy · Post by **jezzzy** » 2006-01-02 21:20

id rather have the merlin instead of the sea king, seeing as its replacing it anyway.

and yes...please please please find a way so u can drive jeeps into merlins or chinooks and then u can drive out the back.it would actually be rediulously amazing and the assult capabilities would be awsome x

Tom#13 · Post by **Tom#13** » 2006-01-02 21:25

And realistic, which is what this game is all about