I wish Gloryhounds...

Squibb · Post by **Squibb** » 2006-01-02 08:42

was karkand only

Noetheinner · Post by **Noetheinner** » 2006-01-02 08:55

had no vehicles in any map.

dawdler · Post by **dawdler** » 2006-01-02 08:57

blew up

Armand61685 · Post by **Armand61685** » 2006-01-02 09:29

Noetheinner wrote:had no vehicles in any map.

hmm nah.

Dethleffs · Post by **Dethleffs** » 2006-01-02 10:13

why karkand only? that would be utterly boring

da.SPAWN · Post by **da.SPAWN** » 2006-01-02 10:31

realy guys, the original karkand map is fine but i have played this so often it is getting far than boring.
look here at this maps why no one put them onto their server:
http://battlefield2.filefront.com/file/ ... iege;48443
http://battlefield2.filefront.com/file/ ... nd_2;52211

DEDMON5811 · Post by **DEDMON5811** » 2006-01-02 11:09

Actually we are in the process of getting a couple new maps on there that will have AAS like wake 2007 and also vehicles removed on the smaller maps. Should be fun.

da.SPAWN · Post by **da.SPAWN** » 2006-01-02 11:19

that are good news, thx m8

Heydude235 · Post by **Heydude235** » 2006-01-02 12:17

more tanks

bigger maps more people like 64 a

Trufret · Post by **Trufret** » 2006-01-02 17:29

please no wake island after bf1942 and DC that map ha been played to death. anyway to mod the good SF city maps to be playable without having SF and then have them in a map downlaod pack?

da.SPAWN · Post by **da.SPAWN** » 2006-01-02 17:34

Trufret wrote:anyway to mod the good SF city maps to be playable without having SF and then have them in a map downlaod pack?

i think this could lead to legal trouble ....

DEDMON5811 · Post by **DEDMON5811** » 2006-01-02 18:20

You could but then you would be in vioation of eula and would probably get a nice lawsuit from ea

Armand61685 · Post by **Armand61685** » 2006-01-02 21:26

Why remove vehicles on smaller maps? Even if there are 32 players on a server, you want vehicles removed? Why? I thought it was agreed that no one wants vehicles on small 5v5 games.

Beckwith · Post by **Beckwith** » 2006-01-02 22:08

90% of BF2 servers are running Karkand, Mashtuur and Sharqi. Im soooooo tired of playing those maps. Id rather play Oman, yes i said it OMAN.

Trufret · Post by **Trufret** » 2006-01-02 22:09

If enough people that play have special forces then maybe the maps can go on becasue their are some awsome city maps but I don't want 3/4 of the players to drop because they don't have it.
maybe remake DC's lost village, basrahs edge, Urban Siege ,and weapon bunkers for bf2 those were the best DC maps I thoguh

Post by **Evilhomer** » 2006-01-02 22:15

Don't, please don't have a 40 second spawn time. I just played and was spawn raped FOUR times in a row. thats nearly 3 minutes. I was really near tears at that point. 20 maybe? 25?

Squibb · Post by **Squibb** » 2006-01-02 22:19

'[R-PUB wrote:Beckwith']90% of BF2 servers are running Karkand, Mashtuur and Sharqi. Im soooooo tired of playing those maps. Id rather play Oman, yes i said it OMAN.

i wouldn't mind oman, it's a good map

Trufret · Post by **Trufret** » 2006-01-02 22:41

Spawn time should be high so killing someone means something. it suck if by the time you shoot them and try to take the flag they respawn and shoot you

Post by **Evilhomer** » 2006-01-02 22:45

Trufret wrote:Spawn time should be high so killing someone means something. it suck if by the time you shoot them and try to take the flag they respawn and shoot you

I can see that now. I actually have a large dislike of the BF2 spawn positions. I mean, you do kind if spawn right out in the open don't you? Seems a tad odd to me!

Post by **BrokenArrow** » 2006-01-02 23:57

Again, the fix for respawn flag saves and having to wait a long time to spawn only to be spawn raped can be helped by main base only spawning.