AT4 - Page 2

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-10-07 18:33

Engineer wrote:For me it's more like engine forcing to balance the gameplay.

Sure, have fun fighting with sticks against APC's if you like... Would be fun, wouldnt it?

That's retarded, plus you seem to be ruling out the possibility of an army having an advantage in other areas.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-10-08 13:39

you said " fighting with sticks against APC's " , isnt that retard?

i mean , we have LAT weapons ,why didnt gave them the same power that they have in reality? why balance everything to the lower ?

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-10-08 15:09

engineer wrote:They could, but then LAT availability can become the problem.

It's so easy task for a infantryman to do a suicide run over the hill, just to shoot that one little rocket to that APC, and die second after. In reality, you value your life. Thus again, balance is needed to compensate engine limitations. PR cant yet kill you over the net.

then devs should add big deviation to the LAT when moving (like the panzerfaust in FH) , so they need to stay without moving to hit something .

torenico · Post by **torenico** » 2007-10-08 15:14

PANZERFAUST!!

ok i hitted whit the AT4 to a light apc and i didnt killed it

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-10-08 15:24

its about to kill passengers inside

and harm it very bad,,
And there are warheads that can blow an apc with ease

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2007-10-08 16:21

IT'S A REALITY MOD,balance should exist not...It's same thing with tanks here,with the Type-98 (Chinese Tank) being able to knock out the M1 Abrams in 2-3 shots...

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-10-08 16:50

INDEED

!!!!

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-10-08 16:51

Just give me an idea what you think about it,, without discussing about balance please !!

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2007-10-08 19:07

Good suggetion with the AT-4 power and etc. m8.

Amek · Post by **Amek** » 2007-10-09 15:30

agentscar wrote:IT'S A REALITY MOD,balance should exist not...It's same thing with tanks here,with the Type-98 (Chinese Tank) being able to knock out the M1 Abrams in 2-3 shots...

And based on what type-98 woulnd't be able do so?

In reality abrams needs a 4 man crew and type-98 3 man crew. It would be kind of dumb to implement it into the mod, wouldn't it?

Even if the mod has emphasis on reality it is also about good gameplay and having fun. Thats why there needs to be balance. I understand it is also because of BF2 engine limitations

agentscar · Post by **agentscar** » 2007-10-09 17:29

Well,where you getting,the crew amount and stuff at I'll never know,All I said was balance shouldn't interfear in a Reality Mod,not it should be as realistic as possible...Do your research on those two tanks,and you'd see my reasoning,Wikipedia pal,along with books and The Military Channel,as I've done.

G.Drew · Post by **G.Drew** » 2007-10-09 17:33

btw, ive seen before that AT4s are armed with lense sights, a bit like the MEC, UK & PLA L-AT weapons, could there be a chance that the AT4 could get a better sight than the ironsights that are on it currently

arjan · Post by **arjan** » 2007-10-09 18:43

http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=h ... %26hl%3Dnl

maybe for nightmaps..
(on the bottom.. lense with night vision)

Rico11b · Post by **Rico11b** » 2007-10-09 19:37

This will be a great improvement, that I feel is long overdue for our armed forces. Not sure if it has a place in game yet since they haven't been acquired by the Military at this point. However, I'm certain that they may have found there way into the hands of some soldiers overseas for real world testing and evaluation

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3af_1189777067

youm0nt · Post by **youm0nt** » 2007-10-09 21:25

arjan wrote:http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=h ... %26hl%3Dnl

maybe for nightmaps..
(on the bottom.. lense with night vision)

No point really if everyone is just going to put on their night vision goggles for the whole time.