SU-39, new spin on a middle aged idea!

[=TC=]nuetron · Post by **[=TC=]nuetron** » 2007-10-22 22:25

As i said there was an old post about the SU-39be sure to look at all pix https://www.realitymod.com/forum/su-39- ... l?p=507926
but now i have a few different ideas:

-1) keep the SU25 in-game and put the SU39"sniper" in the empty hangar
(with of course another A10 in the USMC side)
-2) replace rocket pods with gunpods(refer to picture of blue "sniper")
serving as AT/AP weapons
-3) replace 2 dumb-bombs with bomblette pods: containing 200
bomblettes(50 bomblettes per drop) used as the MEC cluster bomb(AT/AP)
-4) slightly improving the cannoon from the SU25

-5) improving the Laser guided missiles(such as the BIG missiles on the green camo "sniper" so that 1 laser guided missile kills a tank(not nearly kill it and injur it badly, also improve the USMC LGMs slightly)

BetterDeadThanRed · Post by **BetterDeadThanRed** » 2007-10-22 22:29

The last thing we need is 3 CAS aircraft per side, but I do support removing one froggy in favor of the Su-39, although I doubt we will ever see this thing ingame.

ryan d ale · Post by **ryan d ale** » 2007-10-22 22:55

I don't care I've never flown a jet in PR lol

Sounds good though - except 3 fixed wing aircraft per side.

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-10-24 16:05

Well as far as I'm aware the 25 is a little outdated compared to the 39 is it not? Doesn't seem to fit in with the MECs relatively decent quality equipment to me.

Doc_Frank · Post by **Doc_Frank** » 2007-10-24 18:16

AnRK wrote:Well as far as I'm aware the 25 is a little outdated compared to the 39 is it not? Doesn't seem to fit in with the MECs relatively decent quality equipment to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Su-25 -> explains a lot of things

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-10-24 18:29

Well from what I've read the 1st version of the 25T is extremely unpopular with pilots and not particularly effective. An army that can afford Mig29s should have a decent Anti-Tank aircraft.

Doc_Frank · Post by **Doc_Frank** » 2007-10-24 18:47

And the PPSh-41 submachine gun has a liability to jam, but that doesn't happen in PR (hardcoded?).

But
1) The SU-25 is still the basic aircraft of the Russian Airforce (the model is about as old as the F-16, F-18 )
2) The TM version is actually the SU-39.

Warmagi · Post by **Warmagi** » 2007-10-24 19:00

someone said it before that jamming is hardcoded. About the planes... dont care to much...

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-10-24 20:06

I know it's technically the Su39 but it's been upgraded from the 25T (although manages to look nowt like it). If an Su39 is ever made it should be given to the MEC though cos it creates a preeeety big gap in the quality of their equipment.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-10-24 20:56

Su39 is already maded , look at the armored fury boosterpack , it just need a reskin .

[=TC=]nuetron · Post by **[=TC=]nuetron** » 2007-10-24 21:04

AnRK wrote:I know it's technically the Su39 but it's been upgraded from the 25T (although manages to look nowt like it). If an Su39 is ever made it should be given to the MEC though cos it creates a preeeety big gap in the quality of their equipment.

thats what i mean, the SU39 gets
---instead of rockets and dumb-bombs---
-gun pods (AT guns as big as the SU25, hopefully the SU39 will have a better gun)
- bomblette pods(like cluster bombs)

it should also have a tad of after burner and faster stopping speeds to make it easier to land,also consider adding cluster bombs to the second A10 IF you are going to add it

-"i never smile unless my day is made"

Eddie Baker · Post by **Eddie Baker** » 2007-10-25 01:41

Suggested before. Please use search.