AA used against infantry?

General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification.
LeoBloom.
Posts: 138
Joined: 2007-03-02 04:40

AA used against infantry?

Post by LeoBloom. »

Is this a valid tactic in real life?
MadTommy
Posts: 2220
Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34

Post by MadTommy »

hell YES

AA guns have always been used as multi purpose.

EDIT: hehe be nice if the insurgents got one of these, on the back of a HiAce flatback.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcEFYfYrhiE
Last edited by MadTommy on 2007-11-06 16:51, edited 1 time in total.
Deadfast
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4611
Joined: 2007-07-16 16:25

Post by Deadfast »

Do you mean the commander deployed AA emplacements or the portable, shoulder fired ones (Strela, Stinger) ?
CareBear
Posts: 4036
Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41

Post by CareBear »

now AA cant be used agaisnt infantry on TG, wat are we meant to use now! :-P



j/k i still love TG server!
Image
Dunehunter
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 12110
Joined: 2006-12-17 14:42

Post by Dunehunter »

I believe that the USSR designation for their AA guns even mentioned them being used against ground targets, but I'm not sure as to exactly how.

Also, the Germans 88mm gun was both AA and AT, so it's not like it's rare for AA to be used for other roles too.

[R-MOD]Jigsaw] I am drunk. I decided to come home early because I can''t realy seea nyithng. I hthknk i madea bad choicce. :|
robbo
Posts: 1159
Joined: 2006-10-25 15:14

Post by robbo »

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7UOp8iSNn2s
Ive seen some videos of the Ruskys using them against chechens too, google it.

Looks fairly effective.
MadTommy
Posts: 2220
Joined: 2006-05-23 11:34

Post by MadTommy »

WNxCareBear wrote:now AA cant be used agaisnt infantry on TG, wat are we meant to use now! :-P
Is this true??

So you cant use commander placed AA to defend against infantry attacking your position??

This will be ignored by players in the heat of the battle.

Sounds nuts to me.
CareBear
Posts: 4036
Joined: 2007-04-19 17:41

Post by CareBear »

MadTommy wrote:Is this true??

So you cant use commander placed AA to defend against infantry attacking your position??

This will be ignored by players in the heat of the battle.

Sounds nuts to me.
no its a joke, because they banned my beloved HAT V infantry :roll:

and because there was a thread exactly like this for the H AT when u were away i think
Image
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

LeoBloom. wrote:Is this a valid tactic in real life?
Yes, even since WWII, with the Germans and their carriage mounted light, rapid-fire flak guns

In Vietnam the Vulcan Air Defense System was used for counter-ambush fire in jungle convoys.

The Russians used to include ZSU-23-4 SPAAGs in convoys through the mountain passes in Afghanistan, since their weapons could elevate to a greater angle than the other vehicles and engage guerrillas on the high cliffs. ZSU-23-4s and 2S6s were also used in Grozny to clear basements since they can also depress their guns pretty low, and because of the incredibly high rate of fire that 4 linked automatic cannons can produce. Their rates of turret traverse are equal to or better than most modern infantry fighting vehicles.
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

Ya TG's whole thing will be no longer after about 100 people use it vs inf and on basrah its the best way to defend VCP.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
SGT.JOKER
Posts: 1014
Joined: 2007-03-18 17:35

Post by SGT.JOKER »

I know the US uses/used their AA guns to "empty" bunkers
SGT.JOKER>FTW<(Fight To Win) In Game
Just getting back in the game :mrgreen:
Riflemen, SAW Gunner, Grenaider.
Image
Image
Clypp
Posts: 2148
Joined: 2006-07-17 18:36

Post by Clypp »

From what I've heard, the Vulcan Air Defenses System never shot down a plane however it did make a whole load of infantry kills in Vietnam. It's a very valid tactic.
Waaah_Wah
Posts: 3167
Joined: 2007-07-26 13:55

Post by Waaah_Wah »

Is he talking about AA or AAA?
Never argue with an idiot, he will just drag you down to his level and beat you by experience ;)

Killing for peace is like f*cking for virginity

I :33_love: Jaymz
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

From what I've heard, the Vulcan Air Defenses System never shot down a plane however it did make a whole load of infantry kills in Vietnam. It's a very valid tactic.
It did but not many. It is also on the Ginshjips the US army uses along with the 105 Nade lauchers and other things.
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
LeadMagnet
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 1372
Joined: 2007-02-09 20:11

Post by LeadMagnet »

LtSoucy wrote:It did but not many. It is also on the Ginshjips the US army uses along with the 105 Nade lauchers and other things.
That'd be the 105mm Howitzer, 40mm cannon and 20mm guns on the Spectre that the Air Force uses.

“Without Warning, Sans Remorse”
LtSoucy
Posts: 3089
Joined: 2007-03-23 20:04

Post by LtSoucy »

ya and all of those thing ill anything. I saw a movie a day or 2 ago on youtube and it killed so many insrgents in Vietnam that some USMC soldiers after a siege walked around after and that and some bombers leveled a 2 mile+ ring around the base. Only thing were tree stumps and trees on the ground if not burned by naplam. I love how deadly the US is. WOOT WOOT!
Image
Reality Gaming - Making Games Reality
http://realitygamer.org/
Eddie Baker
Posts: 6945
Joined: 2004-07-26 12:00

Post by Eddie Baker »

Clypp wrote:From what I've heard, the Vulcan Air Defenses System never shot down a plane however it did make a whole load of infantry kills in Vietnam. It's a very valid tactic.
The Israelis also used it at the time, and I think they may have knocked down a MiG or two. They still use it and offer upgrade packages for export.

Soucy, the Vulcan is on almost all US fighter aircraft, too (with the exception of the A-10, Harrier and JSF) and has been the standard since the F4 Phantom II. The Spectre and Spooky AC-130 Gunships will be losing all but their 105-s for Bushmaster II 30mm cannons, which fire the same ammunition family as the A-10's GAU-8 cannon.
IronTaxi
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 4925
Joined: 2006-05-31 12:56

Post by IronTaxi »

i know TG has such a policy but to be completely honest..the 2 maps (7gates, Mestia) where i have placed aa the primary purpose is anti infantry...
fuzzhead
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 7463
Joined: 2005-08-15 00:42

Post by fuzzhead »

and they are damn fun to use too!
Mongolian_dude
Retired PR Developer
Posts: 6088
Joined: 2006-10-22 22:24

Post by Mongolian_dude »

Well, if he means AAVs (linebacker+Tunguska), yes waste em as you wish. I dare you not to kill them with it! :D

If he means AAA (air defense cannons) Yes, I'd think they would be used against INF like anything else.

However, if he means MANPAD AA (hand-held stinger/ Grail) then i wouldn't think it would be in the interest of conventional militaries to piss all their ammo at INF.

I think MANPADS are just like HAT but a little less in demand in PR and probably IRL (more important than LAT but not HAT).

It's not so bad imo, to fire an RPG at a concentration of INF/Squad, bunker, tower building window or any other fortified position, but at a single or couple of guys just fun/experience degrading spam.

HAT just shouldn't be fired at INF full stop (unless to TK two guys when you have capped out the enemy and there is 1 ticket left lol)


...mongol...
Military lawyers engaged in fierce legal action.

[INDENT][INDENT]Image[/INDENT][/INDENT]
Post Reply

Return to “PR:BF2 General Discussion”