even when at the start everyone was told not to take HAT because it was to go to a particular squad...
guess who took it ?


hey! how did you know im a muppet? LOLlysander_atrull wrote:mm I knew toft was a muppet but didn't know how bad it was
even when at the start everyone was told not to take HAT because it was to go to a particular squad...
guess who took it ?![]()
eh? eh? are you responding to me??[R-PUB]MrD wrote:That firebsase in west hills provided more use than you can think.
Drawing off enemy troops and resources, providing a vast open area for friendly HAT to hit enemy armour and support troops (HAT sniping my hairy butt!) Providing kits for HAT and sniper, providing occasional spawn for engineers to repair tanks (although I think I as commander was only one did that!)
If it was so mad, why don't you ask how many people exactly made use of it and thought it was useful, since I doubt you've ever seen one there before.
I personally know one doesn't work in east hills unless well SE, out of the hills and on the flats with slight cover protecting it, to allow for anti armour duties across that vast open area

First, I was MEC myself.NickO wrote:It was.
Very good choice imo.
The mec on west city were badly outnumbered and that HAT gave us time to regroup again on the flag.
Personally I see nothing different from camping on a mountain side with a tank to HAT sniping and I accept it as a good way of keeping the enemy on their toes.
