different strokes...

[=TC=]nuetron · Post by **[=TC=]nuetron** » 2007-11-18 23:48

I suggest that there be different types of helicopters
such as;
Cobra;gunpod replacing rocket pod
Apache; all hellfire
Apache; all rocket pods
and,
Havoc;.....something different, all Scorpions(Hellfire type TVGMs)
Z-10;all, whatever the TVGMs they use

Wasteland · Post by **Wasteland** » 2007-11-19 05:00

Could you just stop making suggestions for a while maybe? Or maybe just put every suggestion you think of in one file, and then every week pick the best one to post. Because it just gets cluttered having a million suggestions that aren't really groundbreaking, would have little effect on gameplay, and aren't going to get implemented.

Also, your sig is incorrect. It's "there *would* be..."

pasfreak · Post by **pasfreak** » 2007-11-19 05:09

hey i think its a good idea

Wasteland · Post by **Wasteland** » 2007-11-19 05:13

Taken by itself, maybe. It's just that these ideas are constant.

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-11-19 13:03

His sigs right man, the difference between will and would is just a matter of context and tense. "There will be" suggests that it's either an intention, or something likely to happen in the future, where as "There would be" suggests that banana hammocks being everywhere is dependant on an aforementioned criteria/action etc.

Anyway nuetron, what you seem to be suggesting is different loadouts not different types of helicopters, which if possible I agree with.

hx.bjoffe · Post by **hx.bjoffe** » 2007-11-19 13:08

[R-MOD]Wasteland wrote: Also, your sig is incorrect. It's "there *would* be..."

beautiful...
*hail to the nerds*

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-11-19 13:39

As far as I know it's not wrong. Plus it's a quote anyway, so it's the fault of the character John Dorian/The writers of Scrubs if it's not.

Wasteland · Post by **Wasteland** » 2007-11-19 14:21

No. In Scrubs they said "would", which was grammatically correct in the context since J.D. was describing a hypothetical situation.

Post by **fuzzhead** » 2007-11-19 14:38

[R-MOD]Wasteland wrote:Could you just stop making suggestions for a while maybe? Or maybe just put every suggestion you think of in one file, and then every week pick the best one to post.

thanks wasteland my sentiments exactly

Smuke · Post by **Smuke** » 2007-11-19 16:14

That would be really good

Include that in .7 Developers

Cheers

Morgan · Post by **Morgan** » 2007-11-19 19:48

Marine94 wrote:That would be really good

Include that in .7 Developers

Cheers

Don't say that... You just sound a bit, well, newbie-ish.

Waaah_Wah · Post by **Waaah_Wah** » 2007-11-19 21:40

Morgan wrote:Don't say that... You just sound a bit, well, newbie-ish.

Hes 13... What do you want from him?

AnRK · Post by **AnRK** » 2007-11-19 22:41

[R-MOD]Wasteland wrote:No. In Scrubs they said "would", which was grammatically correct in the context since J.D. was describing a hypothetical situation.

Aaaaah, if you'd mentioned that I'd have been much less confused.

What's the prospects on different loadouts on aircraft anyway?

BetterDeadThanRed · Post by **BetterDeadThanRed** » 2007-11-20 00:30

Well considering how this topic has now become meaningless rambling, I will take it upon myself to offer up one bit of advice:

The title is supposed to describe what's inside the post, not some quarter assed pun [nice turn of phrase there -Wasteland] which a two year old would be shamed for coming up with, even without the help of his mommy.

[/tough love]

Post by **Masaq** » 2007-11-20 00:51

And now we've gone completely off topic and so here comes the lock

You'll thank me one day.