Replace M16 for US by 07

-=TB=-Schrotti · Post by **-=TB=-Schrotti** » 2007-11-24 05:50

Hallo,

i think better replace the M16 by the next release whit the No4 this is a real better gun.

And you will see the American can win, whit the old weapon!!!

nedlands1 · Post by **nedlands1** » 2007-11-24 05:54

If by "No4" you mean "M4" then you should be in luck. To the best of my knowledge, the US Army will feature in v0.7 with M4's.

-=TB=-Schrotti · Post by **-=TB=-Schrotti** » 2007-11-24 06:01

lol sorry not M4

XxNinjaSinXx · Post by **XxNinjaSinXx** » 2007-11-24 06:05

What the whole point of this thread? Is this suppose to be a joke or something?

DavidP · Post by **DavidP** » 2007-11-24 06:05

First off is that FH2?

Second what are you a beta tester?

Scarecrow · Post by **Scarecrow** » 2007-11-24 06:16

nedlands1 wrote:If by "No4" you mean "M4" then you should be in luck. To the best of my knowledge, the US Army will feature in v0.7 with M4's.

No4 is an actual gun.

But -=TB=-Schrotti the US Army/Marines don't use No4's.

-=TB=-Schrotti · Post by **-=TB=-Schrotti** » 2007-11-24 06:16

XxNinjaSinXx wrote:What the whole point of this thread? Is this suppose to be a joke or something?

No No not joke, is a better weapon we the M16 (real better)

AOD_Morph · Post by **AOD_Morph** » 2007-11-24 06:33

A British bolt action rifle used predominantly in World War II to replace an assault rifle that is actually used by the units portrayed in-game?
Are you sure that this isn't a joke? If it isn't then how about we have a 1 v. 1 IRL. Me with my trusty M16A4, you with your "No. 4". Winner gets their rifle of choice put in PR. Deal?

EDIT: Not just WWII apparently. 1895-1957 according to Wikipedia.

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2007-11-24 06:38

Will basically the point of this thread is for -=TB=-Schrotti to show off that he pirated the unreleased Forgotten Hope 2 beta leak.

Post by **77SiCaRiO77** » 2007-11-24 06:40

dont think so , the leak didnt had that minimpa desing , seems like he is a beta tester(or was)

AOD_Morph · Post by **AOD_Morph** » 2007-11-24 06:41

So he's not dumb...just a thief.

-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba · Post by **-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba** » 2007-11-24 07:45

AOD_Morph wrote:A British bolt action rifle used predominantly in World War II to replace an assault rifle that is actually used by the units portrayed in-game?
Are you sure that this isn't a joke? If it isn't then how about we have a 1 v. 1 IRL. Me with my trusty M16A4, you with your "No. 4". Winner gets their rifle of choice put in PR. Deal?

EDIT: Not just WWII apparently. 1895-1957 according to Wikipedia.

mmhh....this is hot, but, dont be that sure bout your message. i ask you:
did you ever had an old style music stereo system? for example from the grundig studio 1/2/3 series(dunno, 1975-1980 maybe?) compare it to a sony or whatever nowadays stuff. its not that clear decision.

be honest, test then judge it.

you know cal.303 means cal.7,7mm?

we all know the m16 was developed for purpose but also for being produced in rough masses and being sold in other countries.
how many wars did usa/nato fought gainst a profesional army since invention of m16(not m15)?
why so sure they would still use it when it would come to a war kind of played like in bf2 scenario?

the topic:
pls dont be concerned, pls consider:
i understand the following message that

taking a bullet in your chest, no matter if cal.7.62; cal.5.56; never results in the ability to return fire within a second later. but thats what chinese and mec ingame actually can do.

as i understand in another thread(s) 0.7 will add some changes directed to weapon handling after running, position change between proning/crouching/standing/running and hopefully also after taking hits.

i hope stating that opinion bout balancing will 1. not being ignored, 2. not will be understood as disrespect for guys spending lots of work and dedication compared with great modding knowledge and good ideas.

im sure it was originally not meant otherwise but was ignored from the point of view of a guy who played this mod since nearly beginning.

Desertfox · Post by **Desertfox** » 2007-11-24 08:06

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:dont think so , the leak didnt had that minimpa desing , seems like he is a beta tester(or was)

So in other words, you pirated it

SGT.JOKER · Post by **SGT.JOKER** » 2007-11-24 08:17

I got 2 main words about this thread.
The Hell??
try to mess with my M16 will you! Get the fireing squad ready!!

-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba · Post by **-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba** » 2007-11-24 08:40

sry, its pure arguing, but...that rifle in your sig...is that your beloved m16?

BloodBane611 · Post by **BloodBane611** » 2007-11-24 08:40

Dude, crack is wack. Lay off it man, for all of us.

SGT.JOKER · Post by **SGT.JOKER** » 2007-11-24 08:47

-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba wrote:sry, its pure arguing, but...that rifle in your sig...is that your beloved m16?

no, I just couldnt find a fairly decent picture of one.

-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba · Post by **-=TB=-Tobakfromcuba** » 2007-11-24 08:57

i think that (m14?) rifle in your sig is cuuuute

Scarecrow · Post by **Scarecrow** » 2007-11-24 09:13

BloodBane611 wrote:Dude, crack is wack. Lay off it man, for all of us.

I second that.

Post by **Cheeseman** » 2007-11-24 09:14

77SiCaRiO77 wrote:dont think so , the leak didnt had that minimpa desing , seems like he is a beta tester(or was)

That makes it even worse. It doesn't matter whether he is or was a Beta tester for Forgotten Hope 2, what matters is that the game is still at works and he might have potentially released media without consulting the developers. If so then that is not a very respectful thing to do.